Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Relevance of Linguistics to English as a Second Language

Powerful Essays
2743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relevance of Linguistics to English as a Second Language
Rachel A. Hattaway
SPLP 4044
July 2, 2013
Relevance of Linguistics to English as a Second Language The characteristics of linguistics in relation to English as a Second Language (ESL) are varied and particularly focused. Some of the areas crucial to this field include language variation (bilingualism, multilingualism, and dialect variation), phonology, morphology, semantics, syntax, and pragmatics. Each of these areas signifies some important detailing in the makeup of the ESL curriculum and its bond with linguistics. Further insight to each one very specifically explores the components of the characteristics and methods in which they are applied. In order to understand the methodology behind English as a Second Language, one must first understand the ideal of linguistics. To begin, linguistics is described as “the scientific study of the phenomenon of human language.” In Laymen’s terms, this basically indicates that linguistics evaluates a person’s speech as it is. Linguistics is not concerned with how one should talk; rather, it focuses on the current pattern with which people do speak. With this information at hand, this brings to light possibly the most important element (and conceivably the most difficult to define) in linguistics: language. This is a complex system used to express ideas in words, and it includes many different combinations that affect the way “language” actually works: sounds, words, grammar, rules (prescribed and described), vocabulary (lexicon), dialects, phonology, pragmatics, styles, jargons, functions, and even writing. All of these different components work together to create what is known as “language,” which is the most recognized element of linguistics. These factors, especially linguistics as a general overview, are relevant to English as a Second Language. English Language Learners (ELL) expect to learn an entirely new language, but they must first witness how linguistics plays into their education. ESL must demonstrate how the English language is broken down into specific speech patterns and written arrangements in order for the ELL to comprehend the L2 (second language) better. Linguistics is the first step to opening up an entirely new world to those who want to explore a second etymological experience. Following linguistics is another key constituent in effective comprehension of English as a Second Language, and it is known as language variation. The first rule to recall in language variation is that language and dialect are not the same thing. In fact, “dialects are simply language varieties.” Dialects occur as differing speech patterns based on the origins of the speaker. The second rule involves dimensions of variation, which states that “people who speak together tend to speak alike.” This is especially true if two people are around each other in the same time (in history), the same space (region), and the same group (gender, race, or ethnicity). The third rule is based on absolutes versus relatives: the correctness of a word or speech pattern is relative to each individual speaker; there’s no absolute correct language variety; some varieties are more socially appropriate than others; there are standard dialects, such as those used in formal settings, school settings, or business settings; and there are non-standard dialects (less formal contexts). The fourth and final rule is that there are levels of language variation: lexical (word choice), phonemic (phonetic/accents), phonological (dialects), morphological (rule use of same word with different form across dialects), and syntactic (how to form sentences and phrases). The entire element of language variation focuses on three different parts: bilingualism, multilingualism, and dialect variation. Bilingualism is simply the ability one has to speak two languages. It is highly recommended both job-wise and everyday-wise for people to at least attempt to learn a second language, especially since more people are moving into the United States each year and communication is better between the two parties if one or the other speaks a similar language. Multilingualism, on the other hand, takes place when someone has the ability to speak three or more languages. It is likely plausible to see this trait in well-traveled people. Dialect variation, as briefly discussed previously, occurs in all different regions throughout the world; it is the intonation or speech pattern one makes when he or she speaks or even writes in whatever language is native to him or her. There really is no such thing as a “standard” dialect, because depending on the location of the person, the dialect will reflect the provincial area. Language variation, including its components mentioned above, is certainly critical to consider when observing ELL candidates in an ESL course. Dialects are absolutely going to be different for an ELL when one considers what is “normal” in the typical English-speaking areas. It is not an ESL teacher’s responsibility or obligation to rectify a dialect that is composed based on speech patterns of the ELL’s region. Basically, don’t fix what is not broken. Bilingualism is easily explained in relation to ESL in that once the ELL does grasp English, he or she has every chance of actually becoming bilingual. His or her L1 will always be the native language, and the L2 will be English. Given that bilingualism is possible, multilingualism is also very much plausible; if a speaker chooses to venture further into the linguistic world and attempt to learn new languages, he or she has every right. In fact, it would likely make that person more cultured. All of these reasons contribute to the importance of ESL. Phonology is the next focus. Phonology is the study of the sound system which underlies any given language’s organization. It is not to be confused with phonetics, which is “the study of the sounds of a language, including vowels and consonants, their classifications, and articulatory features.” Within the properties of phonology are phonemes, known as the “building blocks of speech sound.” As a note, another quality to be noted is an allophone, which indicates modification of a phoneme. Phonemes make up the units of linguistic sound and are introduced as a matter of their articulatory features—the way the vocal tract presents them. From phonemes, students will learn about consonants and vowels and their articulation (bilabial—made with both lips, labiodental—made with upper teeth and bottom lip, interdental—tongue tip between teeth, alveolar—tongue tip on alveolar ridge, palatal—tongue on hard palate, velar—tongue the soft palate/velum, and glottal—vocal folds). Manner of articulation includes obstruents (stops, fricatives, and affricates) and sonorants (nasals, liquids, and glides). Each of these indicates how a sound is to be spoken or constructed. Sometimes, a particular “sound” may be voiced (vibration in the vocal folds) or voiceless (no vibration in the vocal folds). All of this information goes back to a few important positions: tongue position, lip rounding, and muscle tension. These things affect the way something sounds or does not sound in English. Phonology has its own system. It allows distinction, various meanings, and distinguishing recognition. Phonology is relevant to ESL because the student needs to know the correct vocalization to words that are new to their verbal vocabulary. What fricatives and stops and other such things the English language has, their native language may not have. It is best to get used to physically saying the words and understanding why words and sentence structures make the sounds and patterns they do. The next topic that can be incorporated into ESL is morphology. Morphology encompasses the structure of words; morphemes, then, are recognized as the smallest meaning units in language. Morphemes focus on the form of a word, including viewing the word classes (parts of speech). They are not to be analyzed in a left to right fashion; one must always start with the root, determine the stems, and then carry on from there to derive the entire structure of the word. Classifications of morphemes include free, bound, lexical, grammatical, root, and affix (inflectional and derivational). Free morphemes are able to be used alone; bound ones must be attached to another morpheme. Lexical morphemes can be defined and have real-world connotation. Grammatical morphemes, on the other hand, are not so easily defined, belong to minor classes, and only have a syntactic function. Root morphemes contain foundations with which they can attach themselves to other morphemes in order to make polymorphic words. Most roots are free. Affixes are categorized: prefixes (come before roots) and suffixes (come after roots). Inflectional affixes do not create new words when they attach to existing words (example: adding –ed to the end of a verb to change it to the past tense); derivational affixes are just the opposite—they do create new words (example: adding –ly to a word to change it from a verb to an adverb). ESL will incorporate morphology because it familiarizes the ELL with structure of the English language words. In addition, an in-depth view to the very important parts of speech will help in the structure of sentences and what each word represents. English is one of the only languages that treats its words in such specific manner, with pronouns coming before nouns rather than after and so forth. That is an entirely new concept to many ELL students. Semantics is the content introduced. “Words are linguistic ‘forms’ used to convey a particular concept (i.e., ‘content).” Forms are used in order to express a concept’s meaning. As English speakers well know, there can be multiple meanings for one word. However, in other languages, this is often not the case. When objects and their descriptions are at hand, descriptions are usually known as references. A reference is “an expression associated with a real-world object.” For example, a “tree” is a real-world object. When one delves deeper into this ideal, it’s realized that there is now the matter of content and context. “Context effects the referent.” Depending on the situation, a speaker could indicate a type (a broad sense of a given word) or a token (a more specific sense of a given word). For example, there’s a difference between “a tree” (general) and “the sycamore” (specific). This is a type of semantics, and it can indicate either literal meaning (differences displayed) or figurative meaning (symbolism at its finest, especially in literature). Semantics also involves compounding (combining two root morphemes to make a new single word), blending (melding two free morphemes with only part of each free one to make a new word), borrowing (literally taking words from another distinct language, such as Japanese or Spanish), acronyming (using the initials of multi-word phrases and pronouncing them as a single word), and root creation (proper nouns are used as common nouns). With semantics, new words are introduced based on their inherent structure. These words, according to lexical semantics, have meaning and refer to any given specificity. Semantics is important to ESL students because of the more structured and complex formation it acknowledges. ELL students likely never had to worry with multiple meanings for one word, but English is full of these. Allowing students to work with these various degrees of the language and investigate the multiple differences will greater build their vocabulary and comprehension skills. Syntax greatly consists of structure and form. There are rules for how words can be ordered into phrases and how phrases are ordered into sentences. Lack of structure equals lack of sense. Assembly of these is like a puzzle: pieces have to fit in order to be comprehensible. However, structure isn’t just about word order; they aren’t even the same thing. A sentence with a specific word order can be read different ways, hence the structure. It all depends on the perspective of the reader. Mentioned before, phrases are just small groups of words that interact with each other in order to produce sentences. “Phrases are not always indicated by word order.” There are many types of phrases: noun phrase, verb phrases, prepositional phrase, etc. Each of these includes a phrase built around any particular part of speech, with the specific part directly identifying to whichever type of noun, verb, preposition, etc. it refers. This all a part of syntax and relates back to the structure and form. Syntax then is relevant to ESL learners because it demonstrates models for students to view English sentences. It also helps students develop patterns in their minds to best create phrases and sentences. It’s also good for visual ESL learners who would like to see the pattern take form in a more sensible way. Pragmatics, the final section mentioned, is simply defined as “language use.” Three main topics revolve around pragmatics: discourse, speech acts, and the Cooperative Principle. Discourse is “the study of the social norms for how a dialogue may take place.” Socialization is always important in any given language-spoken area. An utterance of anything can be grammatically determined or socially determined, depending on a situation in which it occurs. Whatever the intent is, it is rooted in conversation and can lead to misinterpretation if not spoken clearly. There’s also compulsion to consider: an “obligation to respond in a prescribed, mutually agreed upon, socially sanctioned manner.” For example, if someone has a phone call, usually people automatically see fit to let that person know about it. Preconditions are used with the understanding that “the questioner has the right or duty to ask the question” and “the one asked has the responsibility or obligation to know the answer.” Of course, sometimes questions can be legitimate or rhetorical, which can lead to sarcasm or confusion. It all depends on how the situation is set up and how the question is used. Another category here is presuppositions; it’s a “covert meaning that is never stated outright, but is presumed in stating and interpreting an utterance (‘Even Oscar is going’ [indicates the presupposition that Oscar usually wouldn’t do such a thing]).” Other things mentioned in pragmatics include utterance pairs (sequences where one utterance expects another utterance in return), indirect requests (alternative hints that indicate that something may be desired by the speaker), commands (conditional: commanding speakers have the right to command; recipient has the responsibility to carry out the command), compliments (acknowledgement), presequences (“offered before an invitation to save face”), collapsing discourse sequences (indirectly answers in the affirmative or the negative), and repairs (slip of the tongue correction). Speech Acts are from Austin’s Performative Utterances (1975). This theory is beyond a grammatical form, includes utterance performance, and changes conditions of the world (naming ships, marrying, and sentencing). According to Searle, though, “we perform different kinds of acts when we speak.” One may utter a sentence that can either sounds like a question, a request, or an offer, depending on the intonation and the situation. There are rules for this section called constitutive rules; they are agreed upon based on what speech behaviors are allowable. Again, it depends on the situation. Lastly for the section of pragmatics is the Cooperative Principle (Grice, 1975). This ideal is based on assumption in conversational interactions that “partners are mutually engaged,” “the conversation benefits all,” and “the benefit [is] mutual understanding.” Grice has “Four Maxims” by which he is motivated: quantity (“Make your contribution as informative as is required”), quality (“Do not say anything false”), relation (Be relevant”), and manner (“Avoid obscurity of expression; be brief and orderly”). ELL students can use this section and all other sections of pragmatics in order to better understand the actual use of the English language. As indicated from previous mentioning, language is all about context or situational experiences. It’s also about appropriate response versus inappropriate response. The ELL student would have to evaluate evidence presented in order to determine what is the most appropriate response—something English speakers do unconsciously every single day. Linguistics and all its components should not be taken out of context when it comes to English Language Leaners in English as a Second Language classes. Students must first come to grips with the basics and use this knowledge in their own way. Their linguistic skills (patterns of speech) will improve over time, but for a starting point the best thing to do for the student is to encourage him or her in learning comprehension. Linguistics should be applied to ESL courses thusly: encourage oral reading based on visual comprehension, evaluate a person’s spoken response to any presented subject matter, and work over a period of time to “perfect” things on the student’s terms and abilities. After all, linguistics isn’t about how a person should speak; it’s about how a person does speak, no matter what the situation or circumstances.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Language Acquisition

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The authors state that the purpose of their article is, “to provide teachers with selected background knowledge and strategies that enhance the learning process for English as a Second Language (ESL) students in secondary classrooms.” (Ernst-Slavit, Moore, and Maloney, 2002).…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. (May 2009). A New Approach to English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL). [Download, PDF.] Available: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/migratedD/publications/E/esol_new_approach.…

    • 3154 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to some applied studies, “by 2025, nearly one out of every four public school in the United States will be an ELLs” (“English Language Learners Face Unique Challenges”, 1). This means that the majority of students in U.S. public schools will be English Language Learners. For this reason, it is America’s obligation to provide equal and appropriate educational sources and services. Some programs such as ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages), are making the accomplishment of learning English easier, because it is a program of instruction designed to support the ELL in their path to accomplish English’s…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carolyn Temple Adger Issues and Implications of English Dialects for Teaching English as a Second Language, Tesol Professional paper #3 March 2003…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the fulfillment of the course in titled Applied Linguistics in Masters in English Language Teaching…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Linguistics and Language

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While bilingualism has always been an object of interest and thorough research for scientists of various fields, mixing languages had been, until the last few decades, cast aside as its defective by-product. However, recent linguistic studies show that intermingling languages should not be considered an ill-conceived overlapping tendency that implies carelessness and a improper use of language, but a linguistic phenomenon with its own intricate rules and purposes. The addition of objectivity towards this subject has enabled linguists to describe in length the downsides and benefits of intermingling languages.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stephen Krashens

    • 3743 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In deciding how to develop language teaching methods and materials, one can take three approaches: make use of second language acquisition theory, make use of applied linguistics research, and make use of ideas and intuition from experience. These approaches should in fact support each other and lead to common conclusions. This book incorporates all three approaches, with a hope of reintroducing theory to language teachers. While "most current theory may still not be the final word on second language acquisition," it is hoped that teachers will use the ideas in this book as another source alongside of their…

    • 3743 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nature-nurture controversy has been a constant argument between scientists for centuries and still neither side has won. What most agree on is that we do get our looks and physical attributes from our genes. On the other hand scientists can’t agree on whether or not we get our intelligence, personalities, and attitudes from our genes or are they simply learned. This introduction brings us to the main question: “Do children acquire language because they are genetically predisposed to do so or because parents intensively teach them from an early age”? I believe that language is acquired through nurturing. “By nurture, we mean the complex forces of the physical and social world that influence our biological makeup and psychological experiences before and after birth”(Berk 8).…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Samad, A. A. (2011). Teaching Grammar To Learners of English As A Second Language. Kajang: UPM…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Principles: Good Writing

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works include many thought provoking essays, comprehension and epitomisation for overseas students. Recent trends in educational practice, a guide to correct English, and teaching English as a second language are some very important to mention. Hill’s interest in linguistics extends to all human behavior and similarities and variations between different cultures.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LOE and LEA both articulates the teaching of a FL in a competence-labelling system, based on the eight basic competences referred in the CEFR, being the most important one for our area of knowledge the competence in linguistic communication. According to CEFR, competences can be viewed as toolboxes from which the user draws the resources to carry out activities but which are modified and added to by the communicative process. This competence has a number of component parts: it includes linguistic, socio-linguistic and pragmatic sub-competences. Morphology and syntax form part of the Linguistic competence, which comprises the knowledge and skills related to lexis, phonology and syntax and other features of language systems, considered independently of the sociolinguistic impact of variations in use and of the pragmatic functions of the utterances produced.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Eap?

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aim of this report is to talk about a narrower, functional perspective of variation in language use and the linguistics resources which ESP /EAP students may choose and ignore in order to achieve their communicative goals in professional practice. This involves three important concepts: EST (English for Science and Technology), EAP (English for Academic Purposes) and ESP (English for Specific Purposes).…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    discourse analysis

    • 4364 Words
    • 18 Pages

    JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of…

    • 4364 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    English as Second Language

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages

    First published in 2009 by Insight Publications Pty Ltd ABN 57 005 102 983 219 Glenhuntly Road Elsternwick VIC 3185 Australia Tel: +61 3 9523 0044 Fax: +61 3 9523 2044 Email: books@insightpublications.com.au www.insightpublications.com.au Copying for educational purposes The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter or 10% of this book, whichever is the greater, to be copied by any educational institution for its educational purposes provided that the educational institution (or the body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. For details of the CAL licence for educational institutions contact: Copyright Agency Limited Level 19, 157 Liverpool Street Sydney NSW 2000 Tel: +61 2 9394 7600 Fax: +61 2 9394 7601 Email: info@copyright.com.au Copying for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act (for example, any fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review) no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All inquiries should be made to the publisher at the address above. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Thomas, Ruth, 1980– Najaf Mazari and Robert Hillman’s The rugmaker of Mazar-e-Sharif : insight text guide / Ruth Thomas. 1st ed. 9781921411038 (pbk.) Insight text guide. Bibliography. For secondary school age. Mazari, Najaf, 1971– Rugmaker of Mazar-e-Sharif. 325.2109581 Printed in Australia by Hyde Park Press…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The way most Hong Kong students speak English has always been criticized to be too unnatural and clumsy. The reason behind this phenomenon is that they try to speak exactly the same with what they would write when expressing ideas. However, speech is not just writing read out loud as speech and writing represent different codes of English respectively. Most Hong Kong students have the misconception that all dialogs should be in complete manner with complex sentence structures or grammar included whenever they speak in English. This kind of misunderstanding is probably built on the inauthentic models of spoken language demonstrated in textbooks they have read for over a decade. In this article, features characterize authentic and inauthentic English shown in two separate texts would be examined.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays