Preview

Relevance of Kings and Queens in Present Times

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relevance of Kings and Queens in Present Times
Kings and queens were always loved and praised by other people. Although they are a few monarchies left, and we are no longer subjects of the King and Queen, citizens of our countries, who, in most cases, participate in electing or voting out, our political leaders and other officials. Though most of us no longer answer to the “Mother Country or the Throne,” kings and queens are still relevant today as they are not only a significant link to our past, but also a perfect symbol of head of state.
Antiques, historical sites, quaint customs are all part of the history, and so is the tradition of kings and queens. Preserving it is an essential way to connect with the past. The king or queen represents a historical authority, who serve nation in history. The king or queen represents and upholds the history, tradition, culture of the country. They are the living history of the country.

There is no need to elect a new person for a new term, in short, elected government comes and goes, whereas the king or queen remains in power. This continuity makes for stable regime. In addition, there will not be heavy amounts of expenditures for an election. A monarch will not have lust for money or misuse their authority, which is minimising chance of corruption. Political stability is essential to solve long-term issues. The primary issue of one political party may be a secondary issue to others. If the party fails in the next election, the long term project may not succeed. But a Monarchical government does not have this problem as a Monarch reigns for life. Thus monarchy gives continuity over a long period of time.

There are benefits from keeping the head of state out of party politics – the crown is above the temporary squabble of the political parties. A monarch gives us some chance of being represented by a politically neutral figure. A President or Prime Minister represents a minority group or political party, whereas a Monarch represents a whole society or nation. Until

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Malbon, E. S. (1989). The Jewish Leaders in the Gospel of Mark A Literary Study of Marcan…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A monarchy is a governmental system in which the head of state is a single person. The first ruler of Rome and the founder of Rome is Romulus. During this time period Rome’s power was passed down by blood. This is one of the reasons why monarchies fell. Slaves, and other lower class citizens revolted at the fact that they couldn’t…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monarchial king gets its crown passed down by the king before him. “Powhatan was a leader who got his power from war, marriage and trade of goods” (Townsend). Powhatan was a leader who protected his tribes by going into war when there was a threat from newcomers or neighbors. A Monarchial king would do the same to protect his people from enemies. Powhatan welcomed newcomers only if the newcomers would greet him with goods and would trade while living in the same land. A monarchial kings were more aggressive towards newcomers they would go into war to set boundaries of their land that was not shareable to…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Durning the Western Civilization, Kings and Queens had the power to control the economy. The Kings and Queens main focus on being a royalty authority is by having different views on how you could control the economy by, what can Kings due and Queens have, what restrictions can the King and Queen have, and what are the obligations. These factors allow the King and Queen to gain power by having…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries saw a development of many strong and powerful monarchs. Most of these monarchs were dynamic rulers whose success was due to their attention to all aspects of rule, in particular, economics, society, and foreign policy. Two monarchs who show their strengths and weaknesses in these categories are Elizabeth I of England and Catherine the Great of Russia. Though similar in some methods of their rule, Catherine and Elizabeth held very different foreign policies. These differences are what shaped their unique legacies.…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does a queen require a king to effectively rule a country? Queen Elizabeth I, who ruled England from 1558 to 1603, didn’t think so. She was born Elizabeth Tudor, to King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. However, she faced a surprising number of challenges in her lifetime. Her mother was executed when Elizabeth was merely an infant, and her stepsister Mary I of England actually attempted to assassinate her for the throne! (“Queen Elizabeth I Facts Summary Info.” p. 1) Despite all of this, Elizabeth continued steering her country towards a brighter future: she eased the distrust and hostility between Catholics and Protestants, prompted England’s international trading economy to flourish, and created the Anglican Church as we recognize it today. Because of these reasons - and more -, Queen Elizabeth I should be held in high regard as an exemplary ruler who changed England forever.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, many civilizations started out with some form of a monarchy, that type of government in which one person rules a country. The most common monarchy was a royal family. Monarchies have proven to be successful where the ruler has been competent, rules in a way which strengthened their nation, and acted in the best interests of its citizens. Some monarchs strayed from these principles, and, instead, acting from greed, focused on their own personal satisfaction or gain. In France, this self-interest resulted in an enormous national debt, suppression of the lower class citizens, and…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of monarch gets passed down through generation. For example Order of Succession to the British Throne - Who will be next explained, the eldest child of the monarch is the heir.( Mandy Barrow) In fact who will be the next monarch is not determined by a vote but by birth. Further evidence states, the heir can pass on the role of monarch to his son without being king.(Order of Succession to the British Throne-Who will be next-Mandy Barrow). Therefore Queen Elizabeth's heir might never even be monarch only the prince of wales with his son being the next king instead. As a result, the royal family has a say in who the next monarch will be.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Prince has to retain his power in order to stay relevant. The support of his people is a must. A stable government is just as important as the people's support. A government must be strong and to do that a prince…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay 2 Good to be King

    • 972 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Being a King is good. The protection, food, pomp and circumstance, universal recognition, and all your medical needs are taken care of. The world today recognizes in England, one of the most famously known monarchies’. Although mostly symbolic, Eglands Kingdom is established and in effect for the people of Great Britain, and just recently a baby boy named George, born to the Queen’s grandson, who will someday become their King. A question to consider; when is it to be a King and it is not good? Answer; when the people chose the individual, but God has chosen someone else.…

    • 972 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 5 ]. Dennis Sherman, Western Civilization: Sources, Images, Interpretations: Volume 1 (New York McGraw Hill 2004), 27…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Monarchy In Canada

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Does Canada still have the same connection with the Queen as we used to? The Queen is irrelevant today. Change like this is in the future. Nothing stays the same forever. However the role of the monarchy in Canadian history cannot be denied. The same could be said of the Nazis; or the Mohawks and Laura Secord. However the Monarchy offers dimension to our history.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The King also greatly affected their legislative powers. He wouldn't let people be elected, he caused innocent people to be convicted of crimes that they didn't commit, and he even made it so laws couldn’t be passed without his consent, but when the time would come for the law to be passed, the King wouldn’t show up. He would also call the legislative bodies together when he knew that the officers couldn't show up without difficulty.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It provides legal foundations for the structure of government an ministerial accountability. It also protects rule of law and rights and freedoms, as it was based on that principle. That is what democracy is, so the Crown protecting that crucial part of democracy makes it stronger rather than undermining it. Historically, the Crown celebrates British heritage which implemented parliamentary democracy in the first place. It also represents the common interests of the people which is another key feature in any democracy. The crown affects everything in one’s day-to-day life from how people are employed, to property holding, to court cases, all of this is…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Government

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3. 4 5. 6. 7. 8. Introduction The Leaders Political Groups Monarchy to Republic Conclusion Bibliography…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays