Preview

Relativism and Morality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
883 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relativism and Morality
Relativism and Morality

Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility
SOC 120

April 8, 2013

According to Lenn E. Goodman some things are just wrong. His article “Some Moral Minima” outlines some of the worst examples of things that are just simply wrong. He mentions rape, genocide, and incest as things that have no justification. When it comes to any of the above examples, Goodman finds something that diminishes another person or party and conflicts with the right to possess an enjoyable existence as wrong. He also believes anything that demoralizes man or women as wrong. One could argue that recognizing that the above are wrong as part of one’s moral institutions. (Mosser, 2010, pp. 3-Section 1.2 ) The first example is rape, much more than a defilement of another; it is offensive and encroaches upon another’s body and mind. Rape is about control, power; it is subjecting another against their desire to perform sexually. Many rapists want to demean and belittle their victims. Rape lacks intimacy and is a violation of trust, which is paramount in normal sexual encounter. This act is a measure of hatred and de-void of love. A rapist relies on fear and preys upon a person’s dignity, which can lead to denial and many cases go unreported or time elapses before notifying the authorities. There is no justification for rape, even in wartimes rape is still wrong, although it can be a psychological weapon. (Goodman, April 1, 2010, p. 92)

Another case of wrong is genocide as all living beings make a request to life. According to Goodman a choice to life is the first premise of demands of agreement to deserts. Deserts are a reflection of people rising to moral higher ground in the case of societies, where attention covers and support warrants the personal deserts that we defend as human rights and that one’s foundations rightly attempt to shelter, enrich, and enrich lives. Goodman defines murder as wrong because it



References: Goodman, L. E. (April 1, 2010). Some Moral Minima. Good Society Journal. Melicharova, M. (2012). Peace pledge union. Retrieved from http://www.ppu.org.uk/genocide/g_ukraine1.html. Mosser, K. (2010). Introduction to ethics and social responsibility. San Diego: Bridge point Education, Inc. Rosenburg, J. .. (2012). Rwanda genocide. Retrieved from http://history1900s.about.com/od/rwandangenocide/a/Rwanda-Genocide.htm. Union., P. P. (2012, May 21). Talking about genocides - Cambodia 1975. Retrieved from. Http://www.ppu.org.uk/genocide/g_cambodia1.html, .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When talking about genocide the topic may be difficult to explain or reason yet every person has there own opinion about it. Ward Churchill has a strong belief and how America still faces genocide even today. The thesis of this article is that genocide is practiced world wide and it needs to stop being denied by the people that it is happening all over.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Some Moral Minima” I believe Lenn Goodman is right when he says certain things are simply wrong. I agree with Goodman on the issues he discusses such as slavery, genocide, terrorism, murder, rape, polygamy, and incest. I agree with Goodman on these issues because there is never a good time to kill for the sake of killing, rape for the sake of sex, or take ones rights away for the sake of gaining respect or wealth. Goodman basically discusses that every person whether it be man, woman, or child has the rights to live and be free from any and all inhumane treatment. Goodman’s main understanding is not to be quick on judging things we don’t understand, but to judge those things that are not morally right. I believe that all people are equal and have the right to live their own life as do the violators should have no rights to commit these unruly acts of wrong. Who are we to judge anyone or why should others have the right to murder, rape, or rip the rights of people away from them? The bible states, “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you” (Matthew, 7:12, Standard Version). I believe this is the best way to look at the situation on any of the issues that…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Apa References Examples

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Corey, G., Corey, M., & Haynes, R. (1998). Student Workbook For Ethics In Action. Pacific…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What is morally acceptable?” That question is enough to stump the philosopher and the peasant alike. Two years ago, my English class read Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck’s book has made an impact not just on my life, but my entire mental psyche, because of his concept of morality. Lennie, the essence of innocence and ignorance, represents the childlike concept that morality has very clear “black and white” lines. George, the idealist, sees the world for what it is—gray. Decisions will not always have a clear and easy answer. Just as George is portrayed as the adult, so is morality. It is simple for a child to wonder “It is right to jump on the couch?” but the judgments we make as adults are difficult, and there often is no right answer. George had to make the decision to kill Lennie, because Lennie had become a detrimental and fatal threat. George’s struggle symbolizes the struggles of mankind throughout our history; we have made hard decisions, and sometimes they have been the wrong ones, but those hard decisions will never stop coming.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking into the arguments of Lenn Goodman that there are certain things that are simply wrong, there are some who would definitely agree, yet there will be a few that would present a logical argument that would contradict his arguments. The areas of moral debates that Goodman chose would bring on a mass debate of arguments when it comes to cultures, races, ethic identities, or classes.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Jones, in Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction, points to three Khmer Rouge Genocidal Institutions that led to…

    • 4677 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cambodian Genocide was a genocide that was very harsh and ruined many people's lives forever. From April 17, 1975 to January 6, 1979, more than 2 million people died under the Khmer Rouge rule led by Pol Pot in the terrible genocide that we call the Cambodian Genocide. Pol Pot’s main reason to start this genocide was to nationalize the peasant farming society of Cambodia ideally overnight, in accordance with the Chinese Communist agricultural model. This horrific genocide took place in Cambodia and lasted 3 years, 8 months, and 20 days. Some causes of this genocide was the fact that Pol Pot wanted to nationalize the peasant farming society of Cambodia. Most Cambodians involved in the genocide died from starvation,…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunt, L. H. (2011). Ethics. Web: World Book. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from World Book…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Some Moral Minima," Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right?…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Armenian Genocide Essay

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Concluding, the multiple genocides of the twentieth century have and still are teaching us lessons on human nature and genocide. Genocide has taught us that it is easy to single a people group out…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, many Christians have put on blinders, turning their heads while shrinking back with words such as, "What can I possibly do by myself?" rather than uniting together in standing for absolute truths. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote from the Birmingham jail, "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God." We have heard the expression that a person who doesn't stand for something will fall for anything. We have allowed moral relativism to creep in and push us into the proverbial corner. Moral relativism is a belief that there is no right or wrong, no good or evil where rules no longer exist. Dr. Dobson's letter seems to have more relevance today than it did 20 years ago. I believe relativism has had the most impact in regards to healthcare. The Hippocratic Oath seems to have flown out the window. The patient is no longer the top priority…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Genocide Gendered?

    • 3640 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Nadia Deeb 310203597 5. Is genocide gendered and how important is gender to our understanding of the phenomenon? What is the justification for rape being categorised now as a technique of genocide? Genocide is gendered and gender is extremely important to our understanding of genocide. Connections between gender and conflict, including genocide, are significant areas of enquiry in recent times.1 Gender is defined here as a ‘social process whereby divisions of labour, power and emotion, as well as modes of dress and identity are differentiated…between men and women’.2 For the purposes of this essay, the United Nations definition of genocide as ‘acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such’ is adopted.3…

    • 3640 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays