Relational Attitude In Gestalt Terapy

Topics: Psychotherapy, Gestalt therapy, Phenomenology Pages: 20 (6844 words) Published: January 24, 2015
International Gestalt Journal 2002, 25/1, 15-34

Gary Yontef

The Relational Attitude
in Gestalt Therapy Theory and Practice
Abstract: Gestalt therapy theory is relational in its core, although some talk and practice of gestalt therapy is not consistent with the principles. This paper reviews core relational philosophical principles of gestalt therapy: existential phenomenology, field theory, and dialogic existentialism. The implications for practice are explored. Practices and attitudes about gestalt therapy that are inconsistent with these principles are discussed. The article studies the triggering and treatment of shame in gestalt therapy and gestalt training. The article clarifies what relational gestalt therapy is and what it is not. Keywords: Bracketing, dialogue, field theory, individualism and interdependence, metatheory, phenomenology, relational gestalt therapy, shame, subtext, therapeutic relationship.

1. Introduction
Gestalt therapy is systematically relational in its underlying theory and methodology. A relational perspective is so central to the theory of gestalt therapy that without it there is no coherent core of gestalt therapy theory or practice. Recently much has been written about a relational approach to psychotherapy both in the gestalt therapy and the general psychotherapy literature. In the general professional literature there has been a discovery of a relational perspective (Aron, 1996; Mitchell, 1988; Mitchell & Aron, 1999; Stolorow et al., 1987). In gestalt therapy, "relational gestalt therapy" has been revisiting the relational perspective built-in to gestalt therapy theory (Hycner, 1988; Hycner & Jacobs, 1995; Jacobs, 1989, 1992, 1998; Staemmler, 1993; Yontef, 1993, 1998, 1999). The function of the current discourse on relational gestalt therapy is to differentiate among significant variations in how gestalt

15

Yontef

therapy theory is talked about and even more significant variations in how gestalt therapy is practiced. Some common ways of talking about and practicing gestalt therapy are not fully consistent with the basic relational theory of gestalt therapy. Moreover, there are relational implications implied in the foundational theory that are not consistently, or sufficiently explicated. In this article I will review each of three fundamental and indispensable philosophic principles of gestalt therapy, that is existential phenomenology, field theory, and dialogic existentialism, and then discuss the variations of talk and practice that warrant taking a fresh look at the relational implications of each of them. I will then discuss shame as it relates to a relational perspective, and a concluding section on what relational gestalt therapy is and what it is not.

2. Existential phenomenology1
Gestalt therapy is based on the philosophy and method of phenomenology (Yontef, 1993). In gestalt psychology the phenomenological method refers to "as naïve and full a description of direct experience as possible" (Koffka, 1935, p. 73). The phenomenological method is a discipline to identify and enhance direct, immediate experience and to reduce the distortion of bias and prior learning. An important aspect of phenomenological discipline is methodically refining awareness, reducing bias as much as possible, especially bias about what is valid data, bias of what is real. Edmund Husserl (1931) refers to this as putting it into "brackets". There is a kindred attitude in contemporary psychoanalysis: "holding one's interpretations lightly". One special feature of gestalt therapy phenomenology, as in gestalt psychology, is that phenomenological study includes phenomenological experimentation. Phenomenological theories are relational theories. In phenomenological thought, reality and perception are interactional co-constructions; they are a relationship between the perceiver 1

16

For the discussion in this paper I use the terms existential phenomenology and psychological...

References: Aron, L. (1996) A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis;
Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Beisser, A. (1970). The paradoxical theory of change. In J. Fagan & I. L.
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology.
Jacobs, L. (1989). Dialogue in gestalt theory and therapy. The Gestalt
Journal, 12/1, 25-67.
Jacobs, L. (1992). Insights from psychoanalytic self-psychology and
intersubjectivity theory for gestalt therapists
Jacobs, L. (1998). Optimal responsiveness and subject-subject relating.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt,
Brace & World.
Lee, R., & Wheeler, G. (Eds.) (1996). The voice of shame: Silence and connection in psychotherapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers.
McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.) (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. Thousand Oaks et al.: Sage.
Miller, M. (1995). Intimate terrorism: The deterioration of erotic life. New
York: Norton.
Mitchell, A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, A., & Aron, L. (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence
of a tradition
Mautner, T. (2000). The Penguin dictionary of philosophy. New York:
Penguin Books.
Perls, F., Hefferline, H., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. New York: The Julian
Press.
Spinelli, E. (1989). The interpreted world. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Staemmler, F.-M. (1993). Therapeutische Beziehung und Diagnose:
Gestalttherapeutische Antworten [Therapeutic relationship and diagnosis: Answers in gestalt therapy]
Staemmler, F.-M. (1997). Cultivated uncertainty: An attitude for gestalt therapists. British Gestalt Journal, 6/1, 40-48.
Stolorow, R., Brandschaft, B., & Atwood, G. (1987). Psychoanalytic
treatment: An intersubjective approach
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
Wheeler, G. (1996). Self and shame: A new paradigm for psychotherapy. In R. Lee & G. Wheeler (Eds.), The voice of shame: Silence and
connection in Psychotherapy (pp
Yontef, G. (1993). Awareness, dialogue and process: Essays on gestalt therapy. Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press.
Yontef, G. (1997a). Supervision from a gestalt therapy perspective. In
C
Yontef, G. (1997b). Relationship and sense of self in gestalt therapy
training
Yontef, G. (1998). Dialogic gestalt therapy. In L. Greenberg, G. Lietaer,
& J
Yontef, G. (1999). Preface to the German edition of "Awareness, dialogue and process". The Gestalt Journal, 22/1, 9-20.
Yontef, G. (2001). Psychotherapy of schizoid processes. Transactional
Analysis Journal, 31/1, 7-23.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Relational Counselling Essay
  • Gestalt Therapy Essay
  • GESTALT FORMATIVE ESSAY
  • Gestalt in Practice Essay
  • Gestalt Therapy Essay
  • Gestalt Theory Essay
  • Gestalt Theory Essay
  • Gestalt Therapy Research Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free