Preview

Reintroduction of Wolves

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reintroduction of Wolves
Presidential Address: Reintroduction of Wolves

Wolves are highly adaptable and very necessary for our ecosystem. This controversial yet compelling animal was once naturally living in most of North America gracing the environment with its presence. The wolf is a symbol of wilderness and freedom, but unfortunately for hunters in the early 19th century, the wolf would become a hunting game, leading to extinction in United States. One of the main concerns of wolf reintroduction was the unbalanced ecosystem that began to flourish as an outcome of the main predator, taking its toll on other creatures and overall unsustainably in all of Yellowstone National Park. It wasn’t until mid-1990’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) with the help of scientists and biologists, advocated for a wolf reintroduction program within the Endangered Species Act. This was the first step to successfully begin the rebalancing the ecosystem by bringing back the wolves in Yellowstone National Park. (Region) This was a wildly controversial idea to the surrounding neighbors of the park, being the second main concern to the issue of reintroduction. With a lot of effort and research, in 1995 the wolves from Canada were relocated to the park where they thrived and the population grew successfully. A journey of hope and fear, lasting nearly two decades of careful examination on impacts of reintroduction was finally flourishing. Thus creating a lasting impact on our ecosystem and building confidence in wildlife and resource management. It is important to understand that wolves were reintroduced to create a healthy balance in the ecosystems. Trained biologists viewed the exponentially increasing elk population over the years and how it impacted other natural ecosystems as a threat and imbalance. The wolf being the top predator in the food chain would be the only viable natural solution to control the elk population, because in the park it would be the wolves’ main prey. In addition, with



Bibliography: Region. "A Friend of Wolves for Decades | Earthjustice." Earthjustice: Environmental Law: Because the Earth Needs a Good Lawyer | Earthjustice. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct. 2013. . Smith, Douglas W., and Gary Ferguson. Decade of the wolf: returning the wild to Yellowstone. Guilford, Conn.: Lyons Press, 2005. Print. "Video: Hunting Wolves, Saving Wolves | Watch NOW on PBS Online | PBS Video ." Watch PBS Online | PBS Video . N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Oct. 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As stated earlier, the 2004-2005 survey conducted by the Wisconsin DNR showed that 52 percent of Wisconsin citizens do not support compensation for hounds, yet the money from these citizens is still used to provide compensation to the hunter. The same survey discovered that 81 percent of landowners that live near wolf packs would participate in a program in which they are given a monetary incentive to protect wolves, which would offset the risks they face and compensate them for any potential animal losses. This proves that wolves are not the problem; the problem is how the compensation is funded and handled. During the 2012 Wisconsin wolf hunting season, the compensation for dog depredations was provided through wolf application fees instead of taxpayer dollars. Managing the wolf population not only involves hunting, but also dealing with the consequences and side effects of having a wolf population in the state of Wisconsin. The money that was earned from wolf hunting application fees during 2012 was used directly to compensate hunters for wolves that caused them problems, which was a much more beneficial management…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, we have seen the ecosystem flourish due to a successful reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park. We have seen a steady decrease in elk population, which in turn helped create a successful trophic cascade. Looking at graphs we can see that the wolf reintroduction has done its job, and we see a more than 50% decrease in population of elk. But what could happen if the wolf population doubled. We could see a total extermination of elk from Yellowstone and a decrease in visitors to Yellowstone, but in turn we could see in increase in the population of wolves, water animals, birds, and bears.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reynolds, J. (2010, June 29). Curbing Polution, saving wildlife and wild places. Retrieved from Switch Board-NRDC.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ● Ranchers and loggers are concerned with the effect that the grizzly bears will have on…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dave Lawson, a forester, told me that he was chased by wolves one winter near Blackstone Lake. He shot his two deer during a hunt of three and a half hours. Lawson saw the traces of several moose in this…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci/256 Week 2

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The human history of the Yellowstone region goes back more than 11,000 years. From then until to the very recent past, many groups of Native Americans used the park as their homes, hunting grounds, and transportation routes. These traditional uses of Yellowstone lands continued until a little over 200 years ago when the first people of European descent found their way into the park. In 1872 a country that had not yet seen its first centennial, established Yellowstone as the first national park in the world. A new concept was born and with it a new way for people to preserve and protect the best of what they had for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations.” ("Yellowstone National Park Service", 2013) In the following paragraphs, the author will discuss the major structural and functional dynamics (processes) of that ecosystem including change over time, also, how humans may have affected biogeochemical cycles in that ecosystem, including impacts to the nitrogen, phosphorus, or carbon cycle. The author will also discuss how knowledge about that ecosystem’s structure and function can help or has helped to develop plans for its management and restoration plus the implication of species interactions in ecosystem management and restoration.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elk, also known as Wapitis by the natives once roamed the forest and country sides of Pennsylvania all the way to Georgia. Due to the expansion of society, disease, and constant hunting elk were eventually exterminated from the area. By 1850 most of the elk that remained in Pennsylvania took sanctuary in Cameron, Elk and McKean counties. A mere few remained in Elk and Cameron counties by the mid 1860’s. A decade later there would be no more elk in the area. In 1895 the Game Commission was formed and played a large role in the restoration and fortification of endangered animals. In 1912 talk began of reintroducing elk into Pennsylvania along with deer, turkey, and quail which were already being purchased by the game commission and released into the wild. Thanks to the rapidly growing amount of elk herds in Yellowstone National Park, due to their refusal to allow people to hunt the animals the U.S. Department of Agriculture 's Bureau of Biological Survey and Department of Forestry decided to relocate some of the elk. The first shipment of fifty elk arrived by train in 1913, and later that same year an extra twenty two were purchased and sent to different counties throughout Pennsylvania. That same year a law was passed protecting elk from being hunted for the next eight years to guarantee their survival and continued growth. Only two years later the game commission bought ninety five more elk and dispersed them throughout the state. Although poaching still occurred on occasions Pennsylvania’s elk population slowly began to rise once again (Kosack).…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Go back to California!”, is just one of the many things supporters of the Mexican Gray Wolf reintroduction program were hearing at a meeting about “predators” in Alpine this February. Over three hundred people were in attendance and only a handful of people were supporters of these dog sized predators. They sat quietly listening to everyone bash the most endangered mammal in North America (Corrigan). The Mexican Gray Wolf is about the size of a German Shepherd, four to five feet long and seventy to ninety pounds. Up until recently they only existed in zoos but with the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction project and the help of United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Arizona Game and Fish, White Mountain Apache Tribe, United States Department of Agriculture(USDA), animal and plant health inspection service, wildlife…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The kaibab essay

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Yosemite national park has a problem with over grazing of kaibab in the park and will cause over population and starvation and what the Grand Canyon national preserve game started to release wolfs into the park but near by farmers are out raged, because these wolves are killing their live stock. The farmers want the government to allow them to protect themselves from the wolves but the wolves are endangered species this will kill of this species for ever. With this reasons these could help this problem.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    DRILLING IN ANWR

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PART OF THE SOLUTION. " US Fed News Service, Including US State News [Washington, D.C.] 30 May 2006, Research Library. ProQuest. 15 Nov. 2007 <…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trophic Cascade Essay

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the wolves were reintroduced it began to restore the trophic cascade. The reduced browsing because of the altered behavior allowed increase in the recruitment of woody plants like Aspen (Populus tremuloides) and willow (Salix spp.) (Ripple and Beschta 2012). Without the elk decimating woody plants populations they were able to regenerate. This resulted in an increase in multiple species native to the park. These species included bison (Bison bison), beaver (Castor canadensis), and bears (Ursus arctos). The relative abundance and richness of 6/7 species of songbirds also increased because of the increased recruitment (Ripple and Beschta 2012). The wolves also have a positive effect on the age/sex structure. By concentrating on calves and older females they consistently eliminate the older sicker elk that are less suitable to survive. The wolves rarely prey on females in their reproductive prime or full grown males. The reintroduction has also had a positive effect on the bison population. The elk and bison share 80% of the same browsing food source. As elk are driven from their preferred browsing areas the bison are able to exploit the areas with the most nutritional…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with offering money is that some ranchers have accepted it, but used that money to pay hunters to kill as many wolves as possible (nytimes, 2011). Ranchers do not believe that it is necessary to keep wolf populations as high as they are (nytimes, 2011). The fourth article discussed how the court was going to uphold Congress’s act to remove the wolf from the endangered species list (latimes, 2012). The main viewpoints are the agencies that support Congress’s decision to take the wolf off the list versus the environmental groups (latimes, 2012). The environmental groups were arguing that the rider that Congress issued in 2011 was a violation of the separation of powers doctrine (latimes, 2012). However, it was revealed that the separation of powers doctrine was not violated and that states should still get the rights to determine wolf population numbers (latimes, 2012). In the fifth article, state governments versus environmental groups are the main viewpoints (nytimes, 2013). State governments believe that they are the most competent to make decisions about the future of wolves (nytimes, 2013). Reports indicate that wolf populations remain…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolves and humans have been coexisting for hundreds of years. Before Europeans conquered our vast country, wolves held a very esteemed place in Native American culture, as they were vital to forest ecosystems, and were often believed to be spiritual beings in many tribes (kidsplanet 1). As much as they were honored in tribal cultures, others feared them. Children’s fables often described them as “the big bad wolf” in stories such as Little Red Riding hood and The Three Little Pigs (kidsplanet 1). Settlers saw wolves in this way because they were a sort of competition, dwindling stock and wild game numbers (kidsplanet 1). Even into the 20th century, the belief that wolves were still a threat to human safety continued despite documentation to the contrary, and by the 1970s, the lower forty eight states had wolf populations less than three percent of their historical range, about 500 to 1,000 wolves (kidsplanet 1). In a book written by Bruce Hampton called The Great American Wolf, he states,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In addition to eliminating weak members of elk herds, hence strengthening the heard as a whole, wolves keep herds on the move and maintain the balance of the herd in reform to the fragile wilderness. In moving the herd frequently, wolves preserve groves of aspens and other smooth-barked trees, improving the stability of the ground and preventing damaging erosion, especially near river and stream banks essential for the survival of fish, beavers, and even aquatic-oriented birds. An imbalance in the wolf population has repercussions on the entire ecosystem, ranging from the more easily seen populations of elk to the more blurred effects on fish and expanding even further to animals who depend on fish, ultimately affecting even markets in our economy. This “trophic cascade,” named by biologists and ecologists, have a wide array of repercussions which can occasionally be irreversible. Entire populations can easily be wiped clear from existence, giving way to a devastating mudslide of devastation and a whole new era of demanding complications. In a field study, Ecologist William Ripple and his Oregon State University colleague Robert Beschta reported that “within three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding. Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish and birds.” And yet, people…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolf Vs Coy Wolf

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One area that really stood out to me is that a wolf pup will stay with its’ mother for up to 5 years before breaking off on its own to find territory. The new coy-wolves are now seeking their own territory after only two years of staying close to their mothers. These animals are maturing much quicker and able to adapt so quickly that they can now branch out twice as quickly as they otherwise would. This accelerated growth and development should also come as an alarm to humans and other species. As this group matures faster, they are no longer hesitating to reproduce as coy-wolves are now at a substantial…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays