Preview

Reign Of Terror Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reign Of Terror Essay
Through the years of history many leaders have come to power, and used brutal force against people that have spoke out against their government. Hitler is used as an example many times of this, but Hitler is not the only one to do this. Maximilien Robespierre came before him and used force by the way of the use of the guillotine. The reason people wanted a revolution was because of the power of the first class people and the Monarchy had over everyone else. Many times change in power will bring someone into power that takes the power they have and let it get to their head. During the Reign of Terror France became a new country, there was a new calendar created along with the days of the weeks changed, new power was formed in way of the Committee …show more content…
The of event of public execution was considered to educate the citizens of France. Women were encouraged to attend and knit while the executions happen . The Committee of Public Safety directed the executions. Robespierre stated that "terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; therefore an emanation of virtue; " Early in 1794 many citizens were arrested. Over the time of Reign of Terror as many as 200,000 people were arrested . The committee had France in their hand with the absolute power rule they had over the citizens. Toward the end of the Reign of Terror the Jacobins felt that the terror needed to come to an end. The Jacobins were supporters of Robespierre during this time. Robespierre called for a new purge in 1794, and when the purge was called many members felted threaten. The Jacobins were tired of Robespierre antics and one of them rose named Cambon and stated "It is time to tell the whole truth. One man alone is paralyzing the will of the Convention. And that man is Robespierre." After this statement many Jacobins supported Cambon and arrested Robespierre. Robespierre was sent to the guillotine and became the last victim of the Reign of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Doyle writes in his book that the reason of the revolution being violent is resistance. The understanding of resistance could go two ways. There was the resistance of the king, Louis XVI, where he thought that he should be the absolute monarch and where he believes that he is the one to be ruling over France and no one else. On the other hand, there also was the resistance of the common people that had enough of the king’s and queen’s poor ruling over them. They wanted a change.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What began as a march to Versailles to acquire King Louis XVI’s attention to end the grievances of the general population in 1789, soon spiraled into what became known as The French Revolution. With the execution of Louis XVI in 1973, this new “regime” still had many problems to overcome including the continuing war that constantly needed men and money. The National Convention (which was created in 1792 as part of a campaign to convert France into a constitutional monarchy) amid high pressures, decided to set in place a centralized government which provided everyone with food, support and direct the war effort, and punish counterrevolutionaries (611). Headed by Maxmilien Robespierre, this new government was based on the principles of virtue, in which the government sought to educate and/or force the citizens to become virtuous. Inspired by enlightenment thinkers Montesquieu and Rousseau, he believed in the importance of a government by terror. Robespierre justified his beliefs by saying stuff like: “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity.”…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not only was the Reign of Terror a big part of the French Revolution but it was a very unjustified event, creating sins among the people. They treated the dead as heads and bodies of simple animals rather than thinking of them as once humans. “Carried it mockingly, upside down on a cart, offering it to passers-by to spit on”(59). The people then went against the churches abolishing holidays which were important to many people and their beliefs. They also killed thousands, “many of these people were guillotined”(63). They would cut the heads of criminals and even innocent without trial. The guillotine began very popular through these months, becoming the number one way of killing. “The guillotine became one of the most powerful symbols of the French Revolution… It had a sharp, angled blade, which dropped quickly on a guided track”(65). These months were very gruesome for the people of france and many families, to where no one felt safe. These murders were sins, killed without reason or trial making the Reign of Terror unjustified.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Midterm Exam Mardin Shinoo Professor Michael W. Johnson Revolutions in History North Park University Chicago, Illinois October 2014 Tennis Court Oath was an agreement proposed by Jean-Joseph Mounier on June 20, 1789. As part of the third estate, they were locked out of the usual meting hall and suspected that the king wanted them to disband. They took an oath to never separate until there was a written constitution was established for France. Humanism was a Renaissance cultural movement from the 1400s to the mid 1600s.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Reign of Terror' was the name given to the actions of the ‘Committee of Public Safety' from the years between 1791-1794. Their actions can be justified, but can hold just as much criticism along with it. In my opinion, there could have been better ways to move the revolution along and the ‘Reign of Terror' should have never happened.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1793 to 1794 is when the Reign of Terror began and end. The Reign of Terror was about 2 years from when Louis XVI was beheaded and around the time 20,000 people were guillotined. 35,000 people were killed by officers and officials. The Reign of Terror was not justified.The claim stated can be supported by these 3 reasons: they were threatened in wrong ways for the wrong things , the methods used were not necessary, and the reasoning they gave did not match the actions.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    That is exactly how a revolution can go wrong. Moreover, the purpose of the revolution can get done, by hardwork and perseverance. The end result can happen but at what cost? Is killing and torturing people the way to go? Consequently, this has been happening around the world more and more. Such as, native americans fighting off modern day genocide on the border of north and south…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French revolution was one sided the lower class rose up and easily destroyed the monarchy. Robespierre came to power as the head of the committee of public safety even though he had no other government experience. He was a radical nationalist and believed that his morality was incorruptible. After the tennis court oath Robespierre began to rise in popularity in the Jacobins club. Robespierre leaded by doing, he viciously attacked the views of the Girondists, Hebertists, and the Dantonists. When appointed to the committee of public safety he began to see any attack on his leadership as an attack on France. This is because he considered his views as the general will of the French public. Robespierre's main leadership tool during the reign of terror was terror, but this was a double sided guillotine, this also…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Severed heads, numerous bodies, and constant fear in the streets, does the Reign of Terror sound justified to you? The Reign of Terror was an immense turning point in the French revolution and lasted for 18 months. During this time period 20,000 people were executed using the guillotine causing a lot of bloodshed. The reign of terror was unacceptable and cannot be justified for many reasons.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre was the leader of The Committee of Public Safety during the radical phase of the french revolution. Robespierre played a big role in the Reign of Terror. Once a liberal thinker, he lost his belief in people. This caused him to become very radical in his actions (Justification for the Use of Terror (p. 1)). Hundreds of people were condemned to prison while others were executed, because they didn't agree with his beliefs. Were Maximilien Robespierre's efforts in the Reign of Terror justified, or were they entirely terroristic?…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shown with the American and French Revolutions, violence must have a clear defined goal of fundamental change of a government or it can turn poorly. During the French Revolution terror was used to justify the means of social change. Burke was really saying revolution and the violence that goes with it is not justifiable. Thomas Paine disagrees and views monarchy as evil and the solution is revolution to change the principles in place. Paine sees revolution, even when it goes south, as justifiable in monarchical countries because monarchies are inherently wrong. Whereas Locke has a safer middle ground saying if a government exercises “force without right” then the people have the right to revolution. Who gets to decide if force was used with or without right? Can anyone truly determine that with objectivity? The revolutions that took place after the Soviet Union fell, show that violence does not always go with revolution. Violence can be used to overthrow a…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On V For Vendetta

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue uses key ideas and serval film techniques to illustrate the parallels between the two main characters. It portrays a futuristic dystopian society where the United Kingdom is ruled by a tyrant. The film displays two protagonists one a shadowy freedom fighter, known only by the alias of ‘V.’ The other a young woman called Evey, who becomes part of V’s plot against the government by chance. The director of the film uses key ideas and several film techniques to illustrate the parallels between the two main characters. The opening scene of the film shows the similarities between the characters by displaying them getting ready in front of a mirror, whilst watching TV. As the film progresses McTeigue…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On V For Vendetta

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The feature film V for Vendetta challenges values and attitudes of the mainstream population of the western world. The key concept behind the feature film is the act of terrorism; the justification of whether proactive violence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays