The promises of the Declaration of the Rights of Man were forgotten. Terror was the order of the day. In the words of Maximilien Robespierre, "Softness to traitors will destroy us all" (“History Wiz”). He promoted violence and used his power to force the others in following him by means of fear. The old saying “the end justifies the means” could easily be applied to Robespierre’s theories. Even though his reasoning’s seem irrational, immoral, and unfair he truly believed it would solve France’s problems. In a speech to the National Convention Robespierre further explained how terror would lead to a republic of virtue. “If the spring of popular government in time of peace is virtue, the springs of popular government in revolution are at once virtue and terror: virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless.”
The Terror was designed to fight the enemies of the revolution and to prevent a counter-revolution from gaining ground. Most of the people rounded up were not aristocrats, but ordinary people. These people may have been innocent but simply stated their opinions on the matter of the revolution. Someone’s words could have been misinterpreted and a slip of the tongue would have cost them their lives. A man and his family might go to the guillotine for saying something critical of the revolutionary government. If an informer happened to overhear, that was all the tribunal needed to send them to their death. Watch Committees around the nation were encouraged to arrest "suspected persons, ... those who, either by their conduct or their relationships, by their remarks or by their writing, are shown to be partisans of tyranny and federalism and enemies of liberty" (“The Law of Suspects”). The guillotine was the new instrument of justice. Public executions were considered educational and women were encouraged to sit and knit during trials and executions. The Revolutionary Tribunal ordered the execution of 2,400 people in Paris by July 1794. Across France 30,000 people lost their lives during the terror.
In association with Robespierre the Jacobins instituted the Terror of 1793 to 1794. Their earliest meetings that took place in 1789 were very secretive and did not consist of many people. But as time passed Parisians started to join, swelling their ranks. Maximilien Robespierre was one of them and from the start had much control of the group. Expanding its presence in Paris, the Jacobins “became synonymous with radicalized oratory” (Chavis). The stance of the organization became one of republicanism, universal suffrage, and the separation of church and state. They would deal with questions put forth by the National Assembly and work on a constitution that would follow the Rights of Man and correspond with other societies similar to itself. Rules of order were formed, bringing to power a president, secretaries, a treasurer, and various committees to work on issues of the club. Soon, the Jacobins had a network of branches located throughout France. In 1794 under the rule of Robespierre a new purge was desired. The Jacobins had finally had enough and declared, "It is time to tell the whole truth. One man alone is paralyzing the will of the Convention. And that man is Robespierre." Others quickly rallied and Robespierre was arrested. He was sent to the guillotine the next day, being the last victim of the Reign of Terror (“History Wiz”).
The Reign of Terror, although barbaric and violent, changed the lives of the people of France forever. It created Nationalism that other European countries lacked, and demolished ruling classes, having France truly for the people (Juls). Robespierre, although heartless as some would say, envisioned France as a country of liberty, freedom, and equality. His determination led France to victory in the end, despite all the massive bloodshed and loss. The reign built France into the democratic nation it is to this very day, and into one of the world’s greatest powers.
Works Cited:
Chavis, Jason. "The Jacobin Club." West European History. Jason Chavis, 17 Jan 2009. Web. 11 Mar 2012. .
Juls. "French Revolution Reign of Terror: Truly Necessary?." A Look At Our World.... Blogspot, 04 December 2007. Web. 11 Mar. 2012. .
"The Law of Suspects." Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Exploring the French Revolution). N.p, n.d. Web. 11 Mar 2012. .
"Reign of Terror." History Wiz. HistoryWiz, 2008. Web. 11 Mar 2012. .
Cited: Chavis, Jason. "The Jacobin Club." West European History. Jason Chavis, 17 Jan 2009. Web. 11 Mar 2012. . Juls. "French Revolution Reign of Terror: Truly Necessary?." A Look At Our World.... Blogspot, 04 December 2007. Web. 11 Mar. 2012. . "The Law of Suspects." Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Exploring the French Revolution). N.p, n.d. Web. 11 Mar 2012. . "Reign of Terror." History Wiz. HistoryWiz, 2008. Web. 11 Mar 2012. .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Reign of Terror was a moment in french history that began in 1793 and ended a year later in 1794. The Reign of Terror was just like how its name sounded; terrifying. Robespierre began the reign of terror the moment the french king, Louis XIV, was guillotined. He claimed that the only way to go through with the french revolution was to rid France of all their enemies and potential threats by beheading them at the guillotine. People may wonder if the Reign of Terror was even justifiable, stating that the French Revolution would have gone through successfully without it, but in all actuality the Reign of Terror was justified by France’s internal and external conflicts along with newer humane methods of ending people’s lives.…
- 126 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
So began what is now known as the Reign of terror. Robespierre strictly believed that “terror” would set the citizens in place; with this terror, the public along with the upper class could be controlled. This so called terror was blanketed with the idea of nationalist pride- pride in their nation, backed by songs, posters, books, engravings, paintings, sculptures, and slogans (615). Robespierre justified his regime by constantly exclaiming that virtue was born from terror. Robespierre said, “The government in a revolution is the despotism of liberty against tyranny. “ Although this quote seems confusing at first, further studied despotism is another word for tyranny or dictatorship, which basically means that a government in revolution is the tyranny of liberty against tyranny- the…
- 678 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The French Revolution demonstrated that the magnitude of violence is probable to be larger after the first incident of revolution. As one group claiming freedom or independence seeks to eliminate one or more other rival groups also claiming sovereignty. An excellent example in the French Revolution is the overthrow of the Constitutional Monarch on August 1792 and the creation of the First French Republic. Ensuing the creation of the Republic, the amount of violence escalated as the Republican regime looked to crush counter-revolutionary actions in France while straining at the same time to avoid defeat in war by the accumulated forces of Austria, Prussia, and Britain. The so-called Reign of Terror was put in place to annihilate both foreign and domestic forces of counter revolution. Once these foreign and domestic threats were in check in the spring of 1794, Terror continued in the direction of…
- 983 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
However, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren't necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people's enemies by terror. Robespierre also mentions that a popular government in revolution evolves from virtue and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: "virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless." He says, "the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself." In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of despotic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot may govern by terror his brutalized subjects and subdue by terror the enemies of liberty. Even though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and ruthlessness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and ultimately led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn't necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face more…
- 366 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The ideals of the French Revolution were "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity," but the methods that were used to fulfill these goals were complicated. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were guillotined because of Maximilien Robespierre. He thought that Liberty could not be secured unless criminals lose their heads. Napoleon Bonaparte, a Revolutionary hero, seized control of the government in France in 1799, he was looking to bring peace to the French people by ending the Revolution. For this to be done, he had to be in complete control like a monarch or a dictator. However, the French people still wanted to have some of the privileges they had during the Revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized and united French society, yet supported the ideals of French Revolution.…
- 614 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When analyzing the French Revolution, the idea of political transformation and citizen involvement play a huge role in actually understanding how the revolution altered from enlightened conversations in salons to its completion, resulting from the French “voice” uniting to halt The Terror that Paris had become. Reflecting back on this event, historians still debate on the specific moment this aristocratic revolution of 1789 turned into the blood-bath radical revolution due to the momentum and contingency that each event has on the overall Revolution. The two authors, Jeremy Popkin, and Timothy Tackett, explain their historical opinion on this period of French history, in which both share a similar standpoint on the event which sparked this radical phase of the Revolution. The clearly highlighted turning point for Timothy Tackett in When the King Took Flight is also represented by Jeremy Popkin’s position in A Short History of the French Revolution, in which this transformation results from the event that occurs on June 20th of 1791, in which, Louis XVI’s action to flee result in, a critical advance to the consequential way of thought in Paris that spreads throughout France, a spark into the ideals of uncharted French political reform, and in social tension that will develop from members of the previous 3rd Estate, which will lead to years of fear and damage the structure of France.…
- 1863 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Throughout time, people have overthrown governments for a variety of social, political, and economic reasons. When basic needs aren't met and natural rights aren't protected, people start to question the government's morals and ideals. in the 18th century, the citizens of France were inspired by the Enlightenment ideas of Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau, as well as the success of the American Revolution. As a reaction to their unfair treatment, the people of the Third Estate rebelled against the government, and eventually, after many deaths and changes of power, the people finally received their much-deserved rights. There were many well-justified causes of the French Revolution, and although many horrible effects presented themselves, the resulting…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Committee of Public safety formed to protect the newly formed republic from outside attacks and internal conflicts. Maximilien Robespierre, the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, introduced new legislation and expressed his ideals in a series of speeches. These speeches touched on the nature of public virtue and theory of revolutionary government. Robespierre differentiated a revolutionary government from a constitutional government, saying, “It has nothing in common with arbitrary rule; it is public interest that governs it and not the whims of private individuals” (Hanson 170). From this statement, it is clear that Robespierre’s revolutionary view focused on the importance of public interest instead of solely influential members who make up the first and second estates. The constitution of 1793 motivated the efforts of the committee as they worked to stabilize the economy. Individual freedoms and social equality would flourish under these principles, but Robespierre’s power went to his head. Paranoid that counterrevolutionary traitors would interfere with the government, Robespierre launched the Reign of Terror. The Terror served as an emergency form of government that was meant to scare the citizens into conforming to Robespierre’s ideals. Robespierre’s republic of virtue quickly diminished as men lost the majority of their rights. Because Robespierre executed anyone who expressed an opinion that lead him to believe they were a traitor, the citizens lacked freedom of speech, their opinions, and even their property. All progress towards individual freedom and equality the French government made since overthrowing the monarchy was essentially reversed. Filled with paranoia and fear caused by the Terror, the people wanted to eliminate Robespierre because he had grown to become almost dictator-like. Once the economy stabilized, Robespierre no longer had a purpose,…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Maximilien de Robespierre, born on May 6, 1758, was a philosopher, a government official, journalist, scholar, judge and activist lawyer (1758-1794). Robespierre was one of the most influential architects of the French Revolution which was to lead to an era known in France as the Reign of Terror from 1793 to 1794. He lived at a dramatic time in the history of his country. Recognized for his deep knowledge of society and politics during the French Revolution, he played a decisive role during that time. He studied law through a scholarship and in 1789.…
- 614 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The reign of Terror was a violent and savage part of the French Revolution. The…
- 666 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror started in 1789 and was a time when supporters of the French Revolution ran wild and started killing non-supporters or counterrevolutionaries. The French held a ceremony if you will, in Paris for the execution of King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793. This was because Louis was having financial, and harvest issues. In June of 1789 King Louis called the Estates Meeting to discuss taxes and money problems. Then some men disliked what Louis was talking about so they stormed out and filed into a tennis court, and vowed not to leave until they created a new constitution. On August 26 “The Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” was signed and put into action. Not everyone was in favor of this new constitution though. Neighboring countries and the catholic church disliked it because they feared a spread of a revolution and they lost power/property. To deal with their opposition of the “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” they wanted to become more “radical”. They were led by chief-prosecutor Robespierre, who found King Louis XVI guilty of crimes against state/treason, and was executed (Doc A), therefore connecting all of these events. Although it helped the government by getting rid of Louis XVI, The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it took away freedom of speech, religion, and killed thousands of people.…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“enemies” tried in the morning and guillotined in the afternoon. Robespierre justified his use of…
- 1340 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Battle disasters quickly inflamed revolutionaries who thought the king was in league with the enemies. On August 10, 1792, a crowd of Parisians stormed the royal palace of the Tuileries and slaughtered the king’s guards. The royal family fled to the Legislative Assembly, escaping before the mob arrived. A month later, citizens attacked prisons that held nobles and priests accused of political offenses. About 1,200 prisoners were killed; among them were many ordinary criminals. Historians disagree about the people who carried out the “September massacres.” Some call them bloodthirsty mobs. Others describe them as patriots defending France from its enemies. In fact, most were ordinary citizens fired to fury by real and imagined grievances.…
- 1527 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays