Preview

Reflective Essay

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reflective Essay
Public Speaking

Wire Tapping
My topic that I’m going to talk about is wiretapping, the history, how it is used, and how people feel about it.

Wiretapping began in the early days when they had a telegraph system was invented in 1844 there were many human operators to take messages, so it was easy for law enforcement to intercept other peoples messages.

Then there was the modern day telephone that was that has voice communication technology that was invented by Alexander Graham Bell but even then law enforcement agencies found a way to listen to peoples calls.

After century of wiretapping without any laws or acts the congress passed an act called the Federal Communications Act in 1934. It states

"no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communications to any person …" this doesn’t mean the wiretapping was outlawed but only the discloser of information in wiretapping.

Thirty four years later the congress passed the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act in 1968, the first federal law to restrict wiretapping.

It sates “To safeguard the privacy of innocent persons, the interception of wire or oral communications where none of the parties to the communication has consented to the interception should be allowed only when authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction and should remain under the control and supervision of the authorizing court."

From my understanding of this law is to insure the safety of innocent people the court must get authorization of a properly qualified jurisdiction to be allowed to wiretap.

In 2001 Congress passes the Patriot Act, this act is to improve the government's ability to stop future terrorist attacks, since 9/11 happened.
This helps to streamline or little resistance to the process of getting the necessary warrants to eavesdropping.

Then in 2002 Bush

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This did nothing to stop the NSA, they continued to work in secret listening in without any restrictions or laws with the idea that it was to better the people. The Electronic Frontier foundation states that in 2005 the NSA was collecting data from major communications companies which violate the privacy safeguards put in by the U.S. congress and constitution. The EFF has been able to collect information through whistle blowers and in 2013 the media articles proving the reports of 2005 showing the government got everything that passed through all domestic fiber optic cables, the excuse once caught was under the Patriot act the government can collect any information they deem necessary for national security. Is it national security or national…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Patriot Act is an Act that was signed by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The Patriot Act is an acronym that stands for Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expansion of powers to federal agents to obtain private documents from third parties when investigating suspected terrorist.…

    • 2740 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States was meant to expand the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment by making it more flexible, with the purpose of protecting citizens against invasive methods of surveillance from the government. Prior to this case the Court had ruled in the Olmstead v. U.S. that wiretapping did not violate a Fourth amendment violation since the government did not control the telephone wires and the agents did not trespass onto the property of Olmstead and it was gathered by hearing (souza). The Court said that there was no search or seizure since the government did not go onto the property or seized any papers that are protected under the Fourth Amendment ("Katz V. United…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    18. What is the Patriot Act? a) expanded power of fed go to use wiretapping and electronic…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States restricted civil liberties during and after the first World War by passing two acts; the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. The Espionage Act of 1917 was passed with the purpose to prohibit any interference with military operations (Links to an external site.) or recruitment (Links to an external site.), to prevent insubordination in the military, and to prevent the support of the United States enemies during wartime. Punishments under this law include jail and death.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to multiple sources wiretapping is the act of getting into an individuals phone or electronic device in hopes of listening to their conversation without their consent. To begin with, the case in regards to wiretapping that I will expand on is Katz v. United States in which the Supreme Court ruled on December 18, 1967. This legal case revolved around a man named, Charles Katz, who authorities from the Federal Bureau of Investigation were suspicious of illegally making bets with gamblers in different states to gain money from the winnings. In order to avoid being exposed he decided to use the public phone booths as the primary form of communication to transmit wagering information. However, through time and surveillance federal agents…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the beginning stages of the War on Terrorism, President Bush enacted the Patriot Act. This allowed the government to spy on citizens, monitoring their activities in order to discern whether or not someone is a terrorist. It brought about changes in law enforcement that allowed agencies to search phones, financial records, etc.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, many Americans were fearful of what the future held. Enacted as a response to those attacks, and as a way to re-instill a sense of security to the nation, American legislators worked to pass the USA Patriot Act of 2001. The Patriot Act appropriately made changes to other U.S. laws to combat terrorism, however it also established measures that may potentially hinder the rights of those it was designed to protect, sparking controversy regarding privacy and governmental power over the lives of private citizens.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wire Tap Act Case Study

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the Wire Tap Act was passed, it only protected wire and oral communications, this is the reason why the Electronic Communications Privacy Act was enacted, so that the law protected electronic communications interception as well.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exactly is wire tapping? Do you think wiretapping is occurring in your everyday life? Wire tapping is the practice of connecting a listening device to a telephone line to secretly monitor a conversation. This can play a key role in helping law enforcements in the end. As President Obama states, “When I came into this office, I made two commitment that are more important than any commitment I made: number one , to keep American people safe and number two, to uphold the Constitution.”…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    USA Patriot Act 2001,PUBLIC LAW 107–56—OCT. 26, 2001, 42 USC 5195c (2001) Retrieved from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ056.107.pdf.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eavesdropping

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The problem with eavesdropping wasn't so much about notions of rights to privacy as about people who…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays