The aim of this assignment is to give a reflective account on group presentation and the peer assessment process as well as the development of a personal action plan. It would involve using ‘The What? Model of Structured Reflection’ (Driscoll 2007) to analyse the experience of using a group designed assessment tool to assess my peers and the experience of being peer assessed. Additionally, experience of completing a group presentation would be reflected upon. A personal action plan which identifies areas for personal development and the designed assessment tool is attached as appendix 1 and 2 respectively.
Reflection entails reviewing experience from practice so that it may be described, analysed, evaluated and consequently used to inform and change future practice in a positive way (Bulman and Schutz 2013, p6). Reflection could be (Oelofsen 2012, p4) in real time (reflection in action) or retrospectively (reflection on action). Several authors (Jay and Johnson 2002; Taylor 2006) have suggested the use of frameworks to guide students undertaking reflective writing. However, John (cited in Bulman and Schutz, 2013, p118) cautions that reflective frameworks are guides rather than a rigid prescriptive format. Jasper (2006) also warns that frameworks come with the author’s perspective and values base and leads reflectors in a specific direction. It is therefore imperative to be critical of the model of choice and adjust the framework to suit ones purposes so that it can be used effectively.
Numerous frameworks for facilitating reflection are utilised in nursing (Doel and Shardlow 2009, p42) such as Gibb’s Reflective Cycle (1988) and John’s Model of Structured Reflection (1995). Following critical analysis, ‘The What? Model of Structured Reflection (Driscoll 2007) consisting of three simple questions; What?, So what? and Now what?, each with sub questions was chosen. The rationale for this choice is that this framework is comparatively simple (Howatson-Jones 2010), effective and very apt for novice practitioners but can equally be used at different levels (Jasper 2003, p99). Moreover, it can be used logically with any type of situation by using the cue questions which gives a deeper and meaningful reflective process hereby leading to the formulation of an action plan for the future. Furthermore, as opposed to Gibbs and John’s framework, it enables reflective activity to lead to action being taken rather than being proposed or tentative.
The purpose of returning to this situation is to learn from the experience of using a devised assessment tool to assess my peers. Haven being divided into a group of four students based on our learning styles, each group was expected to design an assessment tool and carry out a presentation which is to be peer assessed. The group presentation involved presenting on one of the 3 future roles of a nurse: educator, manager or professional. Devising our assessment tool was very challenging as each member of the group brainstormed, shared views, and prioritised. Communication was done via emails, phone calls and meetings as agreed by all members. Effective team working was evident among all members. The assessment tool was amended based on feedback received from the lecturer.
On the presentation day, majority of the students including myself were anxious as there was a misunderstanding of the date of presentation so were not prepared. Although, this affected the quality of our presentation as it was prepared under 20 minutes. However, students’ still proved that they could be innovative even under duress. The peer assessment process involved an individual assessment of each group’s presentation using our assessment tool and calculating the average to give the final grade. During this process, I realized how difficult it was assessing others and being assessed without being biased. It was particularly difficult to measure the criteria as our assessment tool was not explicit making it...
References: Bulman, C. & Schutz, S. (2013). Reflective Practice in Nursing. (5th Ed). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Doel, M. & Shardlow, S.M. (2009). Educating Professionals: Practice Learning in Health and Social Care . Surrey: Ashgate Publishing limited.
Driscoll, J. (2007). Practising Clinical Supervision: A Reflective Approach for Healthcare Professionals. (2nd Ed). Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall Elsevier
Hargreaves, E. (2007). ‘The validity of collaborative assessment for learning’. Assessment in Education : Principles, Policy and Practice. 14 (2), p185–199
Howatson-Jones, L. (2011). Reflective Practice in Nursing. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
Jasper, M. (2003). Beginning Reflective practice. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Jasper, M. (2006). Professional Development, Reflection and Decision-Making. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Jay, J.K. & Johnson, K.L. (2002). ‘Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education’. Teaching and Teacher Education. 18, p73-85.
Johns, C. (1995). 'Framing learning through reflection within Carper’s fundamental ways of knowing in nursing '. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 22(2), p226-234
Oelofsen, N. (2012). Developing Reflective Practice: A Guide for Health and Social Care Students and Practitioners. Banbury: Lantern Publishing.
Oelofsen, N. (2012). ‘Using reflective practice in frontline nursing’. Nursing Times; 108, (24), p22-24.
Somerville, M. & Keeling, J. (2004). ‘A practical approach to promote reflective practice within nursing’. Nursing Times. 100 (12), p42-45.
Taylor, B. (2010). Reflective Practice for Healthcare Professionals. (3rd Ed). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Taylor, B.J. (2006). Reflective Practice: A Guide for Nurses and Midwives. (2nd Ed). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Welsh, I. & Swann, C. (2002). Partners in Learning: a Guide to Support and Assessment in Nurse Education. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document