Recount Movie Analysis
Recount
Recount is a movie about 2000 presidential election between George Bush and Gore. During the election results, the state Florida declared Bush the winner, but the votes difference with Gore were very close. When the supporters of gore notice that the difference is very close, they went to Florida state court to ask for recount. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that the votes in some counties should be recounted. As the result of the ruling, Bush supporters were not happy with that and they suggested that they will chose some counties were they should count for them too. As a result, Bush supporters took the case to Supreme Court where they demanded that the recounting should stop and that the person who was declared the winner at the first time won the election. This made Senator George w Bush to win the election. There were many issues that the Bush Supporters and Gore supporters did not agree on. In this essay, I will discuss some of the issues both side did not agree with. I will focus on the majority opinion and the dissenting.
In this case the issue that was argued is the constitutional rights. The constitutional question that was argued is whether the recounting were constitutional or not. The Bush supporters claimed that all counters need equal right …show more content…
This movie is more about the fundamental human right which was violated. In the movie Ron Klain stated that “the foundation of our democracy is based on the citizen right to vote it is our duty as Americans to fulfill that responsibility. Many people felt like their right to vote were violated. Some people thought that the Supreme Court ruled based on party, meaning that they let Bush win because he was a republican. It was unfortunate that the Supreme Court ruled that they should stop count the votes. It could have been better for Gore and Bush to be satisfied with the votes they
Recount is a movie about 2000 presidential election between George Bush and Gore. During the election results, the state Florida declared Bush the winner, but the votes difference with Gore were very close. When the supporters of gore notice that the difference is very close, they went to Florida state court to ask for recount. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that the votes in some counties should be recounted. As the result of the ruling, Bush supporters were not happy with that and they suggested that they will chose some counties were they should count for them too. As a result, Bush supporters took the case to Supreme Court where they demanded that the recounting should stop and that the person who was declared the winner at the first time won the election. This made Senator George w Bush to win the election. There were many issues that the Bush Supporters and Gore supporters did not agree on. In this essay, I will discuss some of the issues both side did not agree with. I will focus on the majority opinion and the dissenting.
In this case the issue that was argued is the constitutional rights. The constitutional question that was argued is whether the recounting were constitutional or not. The Bush supporters claimed that all counters need equal right …show more content…
This movie is more about the fundamental human right which was violated. In the movie Ron Klain stated that “the foundation of our democracy is based on the citizen right to vote it is our duty as Americans to fulfill that responsibility. Many people felt like their right to vote were violated. Some people thought that the Supreme Court ruled based on party, meaning that they let Bush win because he was a republican. It was unfortunate that the Supreme Court ruled that they should stop count the votes. It could have been better for Gore and Bush to be satisfied with the votes they