Preview

Reconstruction: Race Relations After The Civil War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reconstruction: Race Relations After The Civil War
DISCUSSION 1 WASHINGTON & DUBOIS
PART 1: QUESTION:
We will begin our discussion concerning race relations during the historical period now called Reconstruction – this is the time period after the Civil War. As African Americans tried to combat racism and avoid racial conflict, they clashed over strategies of accommodation and resistance. The Southern educator, author and civil rights leader, Booker T. Washington urged blacks to be industrious, to learn manual skills, to work their way up economically, and to win the respect of whites. When blacks proved their economic value, Washington explained, racism would decline. He contended that blacks and whites could
…show more content…
This was something both parties could buy into. “As I remember it now, the thing that was uppermost in my mind was the desire to say something that would cement the friendship of the races and bring about hearty cooperation between them.” He wasn’t asking whites to stop being prejudiced because he knew he was speaking to the wrong crowd about that, he spoke to both blacks and whites about building from the ground up and letting blacks earn their own merit. Essentially, if you work hard, good things will come to you, or as Washington put it, “Cast down your bucket where you are”. This makes the most sense; these men were coming from the bottom of society with nothing but a labor skill set and no money, property, or rights. This sounds like the surest way to get on one’s own feet, earn a living, and become a member of society, all other things notwithstanding. There was nothing negative about Washington’s speech, regarding the real-world plight of Negroes like lynching, hate crimes, segregation, only looking forward. This must have been a breath of fresh air to hear being on the receiving end, …show more content…
He too wanted progress, but not without addressing the issues of racism, segregation, and prejudice. Washington’s model was from the ground up, while DuBois’ was “trickle down”, where the top of society make it easier for the bottom. Negroes must be well educated, and pass on that skill set to provide the next generation a chance to be seen equal to white men. DuBois felt that an education was the basis for power, the necessary edge to compete with everyone else, and to make informed decisions, especially the one to vote, “The power of the ballot we need in sheer self-defence, --else what shall save us from a second slavery?” While this is a powerful statement, DuBois’ argument seems out of touch with his fellow people. The Souls of Black Folk has a target audience of other educated black men, but what DuBois doesn’t realize is how far removed he is from the poor former slave. DuBois was given better opportunities than most of his peers, and asking for others to give up a livelihood and focus on studies wasn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T.Washington were both influential men during the Civil Rights movement. Even though they were both extremely influential, they both had contrasting points of views on which actions to take when it comes to racial equality. Booker T. Washington believed social equality would happen over time when the African Americans became economically well built and powerful. W.E.B. DuBois thought that political and social equality was necessary, so he came up with the movements such as the Niagara movement to push for equality. DuBois and Washington were both African American leaders who wanted there to be racial equality among everyone. Washington was the type of man that believed that the African Americans had to work hard and…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Washington asked the white people for support not equality. Booker T. Washington believed that African-Americans would not make it any where in society if they focused solely on equality. Washington wanted to have blacks trained for society and real life situations; he thought that this would improve black’s lives greatly. Instead of blacks being looked at as solely useless individuals, they would gain knowledge of real world situations and how to handle them. He did not see white and black as a difference anyways, he wanted all people to be fairly the same. Washington wanted job-education for blacks so they could learn how to do their jobs and do it properly. No more whites teaching blacks how to ‘do their job,’ but for blacks to already have the knowledge they needed to be their own bosses or someone else’s…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the great parts of the Afro-American history, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois played the most important roles in the problem of Negro leadership of nineteenth- twentieth centuries. The Negro leadership problem caused considerable debate among Negro leaders: how to obtain first-class citizenship for the Negro American. Some black leaders encouraged Negroes to become skilled workers. Others advocated struggle for civil rights, especially the right to vote. In the theory it would lead to the economic and social rights. The two remarkable black men were presenting two opposite solutions of the most heated controversy in Negro leadership at that time. For two decades Washington was the founder and the trustworthy base of a dominant tone…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two prominent leaders in the up and rising African American population just could not see eye to eye. Dubois disagreed with Washington on what kind of education African Americans should receive, but on how they should start achieving it; he was much more thorough approach than Washington. Dubois was overbearing when compared to his opposite Washington, because he demanded and advocated for political and social reforms in order to gain equal rights for blacks. He strongly believed that African Americans must want their civil rights because they needed these rights to protect themselves. Washington on the other hand ignored discrimination, he felt African Americans should develop close relationships with whites to become prosperous in the…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No person was better than another based off of skin color. His institute was mainly focused on skills like mathematics and industry. He encouraged both the African American and white race to be educated and successful. Dubois only sought the Africans American to be educated with sciences and arts. Dubois believe firmly in excellence and working hard no matter what career. He thought that Washington’s teachings of the industry was bad because it immediately made them of the lower class. Which is dumb because he said that he wanted everyone to work hard at their career. So it doesn't matter what job you have just as long as you work hard at it and are respectful. Washington was right about being respectful to all races and everyone.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington vs DuBois

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Washington presented his approach to an audience on September 18, 1895, when he delivered his Atlanta Compromise Address. In his address, Washington advised blacks to accept discrimination for the time being and concentrate on elevating themselves through hard work and an education and career in an industrial study, such as farming, enterprise, housekeeping, or thrift. He explained that this would earn the respect of whites and eventually incorporate them into society. Washington assured, “No race that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is going to be in any degree ostracized” (Source D). DuBois, on the other hand, disagreed and argued that social change could only be accomplished by giving the black population a higher education and developing them into cultured individuals. Although well intentioned, DuBois’ plan was quite unrealistic. During this time period, over half of the black population above age nine was illiterate and only about 1/3 of Negros…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This speech, often called the "Atlanta Compromise," played down the importance of civil rights and social equality among the races in favor of economic and educational advances for African Americans. At the time he delivered this speech, it was widely praised by both blacks and whites, although it was not long before critics of Washington's position emerged to challenge his leadership. Early complaints about Washington's accommodation to the white South came from the black scholar W. E. B. Du Bois and others. But until he died in 1915, Washington was the most influential black leader in America, and the most famous black celebrity in the country, an adviser to presidents and representative to European heads of state. His autobiography Up From Slavery is still in print more than a century after it was first…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Washington was the nation’s most influential black leader. He had access to the most powerful political and business leaders in the United States. He would even become an advisor to the President. Washington was a former slave with no money who, with help; taught himself to read; was a very religious person; always the top student in his class; worked his way through school, and people admired him. Washington soothed white people and reassured black Americans as he counseled conciliation, patience, and agricultural and mechanical training as the most effective means to bridge the racial divide. His 1895 speech at the Cotton States Exposition in Atlanta elicited praise from both white and black listeners. (Darlene Clark Hine, et al., The African-American Odyssey, p. 443) Washington cleverly spoke in a way to raise up black aspirations without making white people fearful enough to kill and change laws. The south was only three decades out of the Civil War, and one of every three people was black. Many blacks in the south were kept illiterate and impoverished. Washington told whites that if they kept this up they will also be down. But, if they help lift blacks up, they and their community will also be lifted. He advised blacks to not be so distressed where they could not see the opportunity around them, and that their destiny was in the south. He also stated to cast down their buckets where they were in areas of trades and mechanics to live by production with their hands. During this time, black white collar workers such as lawyers could not find much work. Washington thought being a doctor was great, but stated; don't miss the opportunity in front of you right now. Washington also expressed to whites that black people have never treated them wrong and since their destiny rest in blacks, stop brutalizing them and help blacks get an education. Whites, at this time, feared blacks would vote and take over. Washington told whites…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the twentieth century, African Americans fought to obtained equality. During this battle, many African Americans expressed their concerns about racism and plans to uplift their race. Ida B. Wells, Booker T. Washington, and W.E.B. DuBois were three speakers that caught many people attention. In an excerpt from Southern Horrors, Wells strongly states how feeling about lynching. She believed that lynching gave the “white man” the opportunity to kill the “black man” any time he feels the need. “Over the course of two years, 728 African Americans were lynched” (Wells). A wrongfully accused black man was lynch because the white men thought he raped a white woman. “The girl herself maintained that her assailant was a white man”, stated Wells. Wells believed that her people should demand that the lynch laws be condemned. If they (the white men) did not stop with the unnecessary lynching, her people should withdraw their labor. She stated, “If labor is withdrawn, capital will not remain.” This idea will make the whites cease their behavior if they want to make money. The plans of ceasing labor in order to get what you want was essential for black racial uplift. Washington had a different approach. He believed that African Americans should become friends with the people that surrounded…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Washington, he leaves no opportunity for someone to be able to have to training for anything other than manual labor and this may also have made it harder for negroes to the respect of whites because they would still have been doing what they had always done: working for whites. Also, if everyone had followed his plan, there would have been no one to represent them in congressional seatings and no changes would have been made to the law. Du Bois plan was also so ambitious that there were also concerns that came with it. In order for one to go to a college or a university, they would need to have the financial means to do so even if they had the passion. He also “willingly admit[ed] that each soul and each race-soul needs its own peculiar curriculum.”…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1895 there was discrimination everywhere. In America people of African descent had a miserable existence. Less than 40 years earlier, they were either “owned” property, known as slaves, or lived a very humble, poverty stricken life. Booker T. Washington was among a number of very few blacks that were articulate, well educated, and well informed. He was aware that his life stood as an example to both blacks and whites that his race was capable of much more. His purpose was to bring the United States together and show how everyone could benefit. In this speech, Booker T. Washington uses many rhetorical devices to promote changes in the combined community of the nation. In his opening statements he was clear that the audience as a participating element in society should recognize the “American Negro”.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death to Reconstruction! When Reconstruction began in 1865, the broken Americans had just finished fighting the Civil War. The North had won over the South in the Civil War. Civil War was fought for slavery to end in the South. The rest of the country had to reconnect as one unified government. This is called Reconstruction. While South had a few problems which were that they had to rebuild most of the south , they had to free the salves and didn't know what to do with them , and they didn't have any money to rebuild. The south had slaves who worked in plantations. The North didn't like that slavery existed. The Southern economy was based on growing stuff while the Northern economy was based on production. The North and South both killed reconstructions for two different reasonings…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At a time when the Black community is being afforded a free status, but not one of equality, many leaders arise out of the woodwork to appeal to the white governing body for social equality. The transition from the ninetieth century to the twentieth century gives birth to two of these leaders, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois. These two men are both working to achieve a common goal, but the roads on which they're each traveling to get there differ significantly. Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois offer different strategies for dealing with the problems of poverty and discrimination facing Black Americans. Booker T. Washington's gradualism stance gives him wide spread appeal among both blacks and whites, although W.E.B. Du Bois has the upper hand when it comes to ideology dealing with economic prosperity and education amidst Blacks. Product of slavery, Reconstruction, and Black codes (Roark, et al p.616), Washington favors the humble - ask nicely; appreciate what you're given; and say "thank you" - approach to obtaining social equality. Washington addresses the issue with meticulous caution, in doing so he not only comes across as an advocate of Blacks gaining "all privileges of the law"(D), but also of Blacks being prepared "for the exercises of these privileges." By taking this approach Washington is gaining the appeal within the Black audience as well as the white community. In contrast to this seemingly effective stance, Du Bois stands on the platform of ask, but ask incessantly with a loud and firm voice. Du Bois even goes as far as to say that if the Black community wants social equality they must simply complain. "Ceaseless agitation"(F) he feels will do more in the fight for equality than "voluntarily throwing away"(E) the reasonable rights they are entitled to. The opposing approaches of Washington and Du Bois are far from unnoticeable, and receive recognition from both sides. Whether or not these two dynamic leaders are intentionally attacking…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington made no public demand for equality but he secretly made court cases that challenged the Jim Crow rules. And he told his people to just obey the South’s segregation laws and cooperate with white authorities…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In post-reconstruction America, many Black writers, ministers, teachers and others eloquently argued on behalf of freedom and justice for Black Americans, advocating various strategies for achieving racial and economic equality. Two such leaders who helped shape the political discourse were Ida B. Wells and Booker T. Washington. Urging politically divergent approaches, they both wanted African American people and men in particular, to be valued and respected by the white south. However, they differed significantly in the means by which they believed such change would come about. Ida B. Wells told the truth in a way that made many whites uncomfortable, addressing lynching and other racially motivated atrocities directly and proposing that African Americans collectively leverage economic power through strikes and boycotts, and individually protect themselves from lynches with weapons. In contrast, Washington was more conciliatory, appealing to whites to give African Americans the opportunity to prove their technical capacity and participate alongside whites as legitimate economic partners. While the “gradualist” gained unprecedented access to formal political power through his white benefactors, I believe Ida B. Wells’ argument that African Americans stop conceding power to whites was more persuasive in advancing racial equality for African Americans in post-reconstruction America.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays