This report will mention two recent scientific advances , one is storing carbon dioxide deep underground in rock form and the other one is mainly talk about scientists develop carbon dioxide sequestration technique . There will be both contrast and comparison about scientists develop carbon dioxide sequestration technique . There will be both contrast and comparison about these two scientific advances .The methodology that acquire the information and statistics to achieve will be introduced later .A discussion will be given after the findings which got from the information .and finally I will be given after the illustrate findings which got from the information .and finally I will make a conclusion and list the recommends of it.
The purpose of this research is to introduce two different recent scientific advances that can solve the issues of carbon dioxide .Nowadays ,carbon dioxide problem can seriously affected our environment and our daily lives . There are several harmful aspects of carbon dioxide : high concentration causes narcosis , and it increase the cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure .and the most serious things is it can reduces ozone sphere concentration. As carbon dioxide continues to burgeon in the atmosphere causing the Earth's climate to warm ,scientist are trying to find ways to remove the excess gas from the atmosphere and store it where it can cause no trouble .There two current scientific advances both can help human deal with issues of carbon dioxide.
To accumulate the goal I set for my research and I will comparing and contrasting these two scientific advances and try to find which one is more feasible .To collect data got from the information .I will make a chart to let the other people clearly discrimination these two advanced ,and this can all address the purpose to give information about the two scientific progress that was undertake the students which made by experts can show the contribution of these two scientific advanced.
To let the other people clearly read these two scientific advanced the compare I contrast organize was useful .There is a contrast table below.
Storing carbon dioxide deep underground in rock form
Scientists develop CO2 sequestration technique
Storing CO2 underground in the rock .
Scientist are trying to find ways to remove the excess gas.
chemistry - ecology
Carbon may be captured as a byproduct in process such as petroleum refining .It can be stored in reservoirs. Storage of CO2 as solid magnesium carbonates or calcium carbonates deep underground in basaltic rocks may provide a long time and thermodynamically stable solution, Differences:
Remove and store CO2 with generally negative hydrogen to producing alkalinity . Decrease the alkalinity.
Chemistry environmental science
Dr. Lawrence. Livermore
Using thermal/mechanical procedures to concentrate molecular CO2 from their air while recycling renegade. They not only found a way to remove and store CO2 from the atmosphere while producing H2,also suggested that they can help save marine ecosystems with this new technique. Similarities:
Both of them talk about the ways to store and remove carbon dioxide . The part of science is chemistry.
The scientific advance can protect environment from pollution The previous strategy for dealing with the issue both had a lot of disadvantages
These were all aspects which got from the research .In the table it clearly showed the differences and similarities of this two scientific advances.
In the first scientific advanced ,Dr Gislason try to develop a new technique that can storing carbon dioxide deep underground in rock form . A new technique that can storing carbon dioxide deep underground rock form .This scientific that are continue developing now. if it can be succeed ,the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document