Preview

Reasons: Julius Caesar's Views On Suicide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
902 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reasons: Julius Caesar's Views On Suicide
Julius Caesar The Romans held different views on suicide, depending on the situation. They thought of suicide as heroic in some cases and as immoral in other cases. If someone in the Roman Empire wanted to kill themselves, they had to apply to the Senate, and then the Senate would judge if it was justifiable or not. If their reason to want to die was justified, then they would be allowed to kill themselves, and would sometimes even be provided hemlock to kill themselves with. Slaves were not allowed to commit suicide because they were considered property, rather than being considered a human being. People that were accused of capital crimes were not allowed to commit suicide either because if they killed themselves, then the state wouldn’t …show more content…
I think that you can control whether or not you do well on certain things or how nice you are to people. I don’t think that you can exactly control how well the outcomes of things that you do will be, but I do think that you can make it more likely to have a better outcome by spending more time on stuff and putting more effort into it. I think that this is the same for everyone, but the only difference is that different people have different opportunities. People that live in America will have different opportunities than people who live in France or North Korea. I still think that everyone can control their own futures to a certain extent, but that their futures are limited based on other factors like where they live and their family’s financial status along with how their family works. I am not very superstitious. Sometimes, I read horoscope posts on social media, such as Instagram, but they just say something like “the signs as cookies,” or anything like that. With these posts, the things that they put for each of the signs could be any person because I don’t really think that it’s based off of anything real. As for real horoscopes, I don’t read mine on a regular basis. If I happen to see something with horoscopes then I might read mine, but I don’t take the advice that it gives because I don’t believe in it. I don’t believe in it because the things that they say are very generic and could be said about any given person, …show more content…
Caesar had named himself the dictator of Rome for life, and the citizens did not like that because they wanted to keep their Roman Republic how it was before. The republic was divided into 3 parts, and if Caesar was dictator for life, then he would continue to gain more and more power, and would eventually just pass laws without having anybody vote on them. Shortly before Caesar’s death, he had announced himself as dictator for life in Rome. Many politicians saw Caesar as eventually becoming a king, and Rome did not want a monarchical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was Roman’s dictator in Julius Caesar. However, He was popular with the common people because he provided entertainment, reduced their debt, conquered land for Rome, and was charisma.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman government before Caesar was considered well established. Citizens voted for two consuls who oversaw Rome for a limited reign, the consuls where advised by the senate which was made up of retired magistrates. Caesar changed this all when he was named dictator for life giving him absolute power over all of Rome. Caesar had held office before his rise to head of Rome; he won several political offices, but Governor of Farther Spain won him his future. This position allowed his to ally himself with Crassus who was the richest man in Rome and who had gained fame by putting down a major slave revolt. The other man he allied himself with was Pompey. Pompey was a successful military leader and the three men used their armies and wealth to…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when the Roman Empire was still in one piece; a man named Julius Caesar, set out to rule it all. The senate of Rome saw Caesar as a threat to their power in the Roman government and, seeing that Caesar was about to become Emperor, they killed him. One question still stands “would Julius Caesar become a ruthless tyrant, or a great ruler of Rome?” , Caesar was a great man. Caesar had a heart for the people of Rome, Providing them with food, jobs, sanitation, and water, as is stated in “Killing Caesar” written by Jon Herman, “The hungry hordes of the city were now given bread.”…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DBQ On Julius Caesar

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Historic Background: Ever since Julius Caesar was a child he dreamed of having great power. During his early political years he used many ways to gain power including bribery, intimidation, and manipulation. He took Romans to new heights while he made Roman long lasting dreams finally come true. He fought many battles and gained Rome many resources and land. When he finally returned to Rome he settled down as dictator for life. This…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was a well liked leader and politician. During his life he helped to transform Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He also expanded the amount of land that was ruled by the Romans. The Republic was in a state of chaos while Caesar was growing up, which tarnished the prestige of Rome, and caused it to appear unsteady and overwhelmed with its own…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While he never actually became a dictator, he showed many of the qualities that describe a powerful dictator. The main aspect of leadership he shows is the opportunity for corruption in people. In Brutus’s words: “He would be crowned. How that might change his nature, there's the question.”(Shakespeare) There is no way to tell what Caesar will become if he does take the Roman crown. Caesar also uses manipulation. During the scene where Caesar refuses the crown, he is manipulating the audience into thinking he doesn’t want the crown and surveying the audience as to whether or not they want him to be emperor. Lastly, he holds himself in high esteem. Quotes like, “I am as constant as the northern star,” (Shakespeare) and “Danger knows full well that Caesar is more dangerous than he.” (Shakespeare) really explore the mentality of Caesar. This narcissistic mentality is something that would show even brighter in a single dictator…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he was convinced to join the. Other senators in a conspiracy to kill Caesar. The people had the fear of Caesar gaining overall power after his vow as “dictator for life”.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved most of Caesar's qualities. He was a good and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a problem with Caesar and plotted to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil war between the Romans. This war may have been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had done things a little differently. Cassius would have made a better leader rather than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer like Caesar did.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar the rulers break and bend the rules one after another. I don't think the rulers should be able to break there rules and then tell us not to even if it was for the good of the country. “As a rule, men worry more about what they can't see than about what they can” (Caesar). This quote really gets to the reader because all of the other rulers assumed that Julius Caesar was going to change their country into something that wasn’t good for the people. They were so worries about how they thought he was going to ruin their government that they didn’t look at the positive sides to Julius being a ruler. We have been learning about Julius Caesar in class for weeks and by the time you get done reading this essay you might agree with me. After you get done reading this you will gain more knowledge about giving one man so much power for one country can cause so much trouble. Julius Caesar and Brutus did not agree on the future government of Rome so Brutus ultimately killed Caesar. I disagree, Julius Caesar was a powerful man that was seen as a threat, brutus didn’t agree with having Rome as a dictatorship, and in result Brutus kills Caesar in fear of Rome falling apart and only to become a…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Rome established itself, they were determined to never again be ruled by a monarch. The Romans’ setup a new government called a republic. Romans thought a republic would keep any individuals from gaining too much power. Later Romans looked back with enormous pride on the achievements of the early republic. Between 509 B.C. and 133 B.C., Rome adapted the government to fit the need of the people it served. It also developed the military power to not only conqueror not only Italy, but also the entire Mediterranean world. In the early republic the patricians controlled power, the land holding upper class. Senators, who served for life, interpreted laws and issued decrees. In the event of a war the senate might elect a dictator who ruled for only six months in time of emergency. (“Roman Republic.") In 69 B.C. Julius Caesar emerged into the picture, becoming a quaestor. He was able commander who led many conquests for Rome. In 59 B.C. Caesar set out for a new conquest. After nine years of constant fighting, he finally conquered Gaul. Pompey grew jealous of his achievement and had the Senate order him to disband his forces and return to Rome. Caesar…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I decided that I should write to you about the events of yesterday, which I believe you have heard by now. Though if you haven’t, yesterday Caesar was killed in an attack orchestrated by Brutus and Cassius. When I heard, I have to admit that I was shocked that Caesar was dead and that Rome would lose the best leader we’ve had. In my opinion, Caesar was a great dictator, who was just trying to help the Roman Empire expand and was trying to make Rome better, so I believe that it’s good that he was killed.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics had much to do with the fall of each empire. In 202 B.C., the Han dynasty established a monarchy. It consisted of one emperor and several different chancellors. In the beginning of Rome's Empire, most of the cities had kings. However in about 509 B.C the Romans decided to establish a government, which is known as a republic. Unlike the Han's monarchy, not one single person ruled over everyone else. For a while each type of government worked, but the thought of acquiring more power became some rulers' main focus and eventually led to the fall of their empires. In 60 B.C, a war general known as Julius Caesar, became very popular throughout Rome. Many of the citizens looked up to his bravery and other respected men started to envy him. Because of his popularity there was talk of a dictatorship. This did not settle well with the other leaders of Rome and on March 14, 44 B.C, the day also known as the Ides of March, Julius Caesar was…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is because he created the 10th Legion and proved himself to be an adept military leader (Biography.com Editors 14). Also, Caesar reformed the Roman calendar and greatly increased the size of the Roman Senate (Biography.com Editors 14). However, everything Caesar did was only to increase his influence with the people of Rome so that he could become more powerful. For instance, the only reason Caesar expanded the Roman Senate, was so that he could fill it with allies who would later advocate for him. Moreover, Caesar ruled as dictator for only a year before his assassination, the majority of his actions that took place beforehand that are often seen as good were only a campaign that Caesar was a part of in an attempt to gain popularity, one in which he succeeded. Overall, everything Caesar did was for himself, although he was an innovative think as well as an adept military leader, he had a blatant disregard for the prosperity of all of his people, even the ones that he viewed as being…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because Brutus convinces the public that Caesar was tyrant go needed to be eliminated in order for Rome to be free. But Caesar didn't even get to make any rules or anything. Brutus wanted to be and emperor and do what he thought was best for…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays