Preview

Reanimate False Species

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reanimate False Species
The controversial issue that Please Reanimate and Do Not Reanimate address is that we can revive species that could possibly help our ecosystems and save modern day species of animals from going extinct; but on the other hand, reviving “extinct species poses a risk of selling the public on a false promise that technology alone can solve our ongoing environmental woes.” Reviving certain species could give ecosystems that depend on “keystone species” that have lost the species diversity they once had because some species no longer fit. And as environmental change occurs, ancient diversity may be needed again. The ability to reanimate extinct species would be perfect for this situation. But with the public rationalizing that researchers can
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stewart Brand The Case For De-Extinction Summary
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stewart Brand The Case For De-Extinction Summary

    Brand claims that due to massive discoveries in the 1980s, “Sequenceable DNA can be recovered from museum specimens and some fossils of extinct species”, and with that “... it might be possible to bring some extinct animals back to life.” This directly goes against many views of many different religions when it comes to mankind and recreating life. That being said, Brand isn't appealing to that large group of students in the UTA community.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bring Back The Dinosaurs: Ethical Analysis
    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page

    Bring Back The Dinosaurs: Ethical Analysis

    Genetic engineering would be another ethical dilemma in bringing back the dinosaurs after they became extinct animals. There was a reason why natural selection took them off the face of the earth. The scientists took the DNA of dinosaurs from a mosquito that they found underground after it was fossilized in amber. With regard to what was said in the movie the scientists used frog DNA to fill the gaps between the dinosaurs DNA. It would have many scientists intrigued by this genetically engineered animal that was brought back to life but it would also have a lot of people scared if they somehow got their research stolen.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Chapter Eight Summary of Zoobiquity
    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chapter Eight Summary of Zoobiquity

    Cited: Natterson-Horowitz, Barbara, and Kathryn Bowers. Zoobiquity: What Animals Can Teach Us about Health and the Science of Healing. New York: A.A. Knopf, 2012. Print.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci 207 Week 1
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sci 207 Week 1

    Extinction is a natural selection process. Should humans strive to preserve a representative sample of all biomes or aquatic zones?…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurassic Park Argumentative Analysis
    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jurassic Park Argumentative Analysis

    Stuart Pimm offers a degree in Conservation Ecology from Duke University. His Argument focuses largely on humans are not ready for De-Extinction in that since humans were the ones that pushed them to disappear, they are not going to want those species back. He gives the example that “hunters at [the Pyrenean ibex] to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito every eaten.” He notes that the problem is whether we can resurrect these species or not, but more along the lines of whether the rest of the population will accept the animals back in their original homes. He also believes that De-Extinction “seduces” those granting research money and support into thinking they are doing well when it simply gives “unscrupulous developers a veil to hide their rapaciousness, with promises to fix things later.”…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of De-Extinction Isn T Worth It
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of De-Extinction Isn T Worth It

    If we brought back extinct animals, it would take a lot of funds and research, causing us to forget about other research projects. In Mrs. Zielinski’s article she told us that it could cost millions of dollars to resurrect a species. We could use the funds to do more research on things to benefit us, like cancer research, which is an actual problem in today's world, unlike this made-up problem. If we go on with this, we could forget about endangered animals, since we could revive them. Organizations could lost what little funding they already have, thanks to this huge waste of money and research.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Animal Cloning
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Animal Cloning

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Animal Testing Be Banned Research
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Animal Testing Be Banned Research

    First of all, research on animals is sometimes flawed because of biased scientists. According to pro-con.org “87% of the studies failed to randomize the selection of animals and 80% did not use blinding (another technique to reduce researcher bias)” This shows that even though scientists have acces to all of these animals,they mess up the researech due to bias,and all…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conservation and Preservation Check Pt Week 2 Sci275
    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conservation and Preservation Check Pt Week 2 Sci275

    I am on the side of preservation. I think that things should be left as natural as possible. That was the way it was before mankind, and the wildlife was not threatened in any…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction
    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    No to De Extinction

    Whether it is bringing people back from the dead or resurrecting an entire extinct species, for hundreds of years, scientists everywhere have had the desire and craving to try and reverse nature’s kiss of death. Modern scientists are exploring the possibility of resurrecting species, that we and our ancestors led to extinction, through the process of de-extinction or also known as “resurrection biology”. Scientists believe that this project would not only allow us to redeem our mistakes but also provide breakthroughs in the field of genetic engineering. This concept was first presented to the public in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 film, Jurassic Park that also shows how there are much greater repercussions of this experiment than there could be scientific gains. Even though these projects have purely good intentions, similarly to Frankenstein’s experiment, good intentions of a science experiment, which tampers with life and death, often have a greater chance of going south and causing more danger than benefit. Although astounding scientific breakthroughs may come to be as the result of a successful de-extinction project, there are many greater dangers that could develop for the human race through bringing back certain extinct species. While evolution may be cruel, it is never wrong therefore there was a reason for the species to have gone extinct in the first place and the natural cycle of life and death should not be tampered with artificially.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Cloning
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Cloning

    There are many opinions that different from both sides of going for and against animal cloning. Jacqueline Langwith writes, “Some people don't like cloning because they do not like the idea of recreating an animal or species” (Langwith). Although her statement provides a rationale why certain people may not like this process, they do not understand that animal cloning is not hurting the species. Cloning is saving species. Therefore, animal cloning should be legalized. Cloning can save endangered species, researchers can use animal clones for a food source, and researchers can study organs and tissues from clones.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Cloning
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Cloning

    De-extinction is when someone creates an organism that is the same or similar to an extinct species. Cloning has been the most common that scientists have been trying to achieve. Some of the animals that they are trying to bring back are the passenger pigeon and the woolly mammoth, they plan to do this by extracting DNA fragments from preserved animals they have. Cloning only can work if they…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Research Paper
    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Animal Testing Research Paper

    may be needed for testing, and to retrieve it, scientists would have to kill the animal.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Human Cloning Controversy
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Human Cloning Controversy

    For example, according to Walter Glannon, cloning, as a form of asexual reproduction, can result in serious long term genetic costs to the survival capacity of the human race (Glannon, 1998). Sexual reproduction allows for genetic variation among offspring, which, in turn enhances the ability of a species to adapt to change (Glannon, 1998). If this natural method of evolution is taken away, we may find ourselves unable to adapt. Jamie Ahlberg also touched on this topic, as he stated that, “Genetic diversity allows a species to survive the force of new and rapidly developing pathogens, and cloning would undermine the effectiveness of this line of defense” (Ahlberg, 2010). As our world continues to change due to global warming and carbon emissions, we cannot risk the survival capability of our race simply because we are curious as to how far science can take…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of Invasive Species
    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Importance Of Invasive Species

    With the new technological advances scientist posses the power to bring extinct species back to the world today. This power is greater than any scientist and should be left alone. Dr. Sattler says it best in the american classic Jurassic Park,” Well, the question is, how can you know anything about an extinct ecosystem? And therefore, how could you ever assume that you can control it? . . . but these are aggressive living things that have no idea what century they're in, and they'll defend themselves, violently if necessary.” Even though this quote was not from a credible source, the message stands true; scientist can not prove why certain older species were selected by nature for extinction and if this creatures could posses a threat to human life.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics