Reader Reaction to Christie's the Murder of Roger Ackroyd

Topics: Agatha Christie, Unreliable narrator, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Pages: 8 (3234 words) Published: September 14, 2007
Pleasure or Bliss: Reader Reaction to Christie's The Murder of Roger Ackroyd In The Pleasure of the Text printed in 1975, Roland Barthes defines two kinds of text. According to Barthes, the "text of pleasure" is "text that contents . . . that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading" (14). The "text of bliss" is text "that discomforts . . . unsettles the reader's historical, cultural, psychological assumptions, the consistency of his tastes . . . ." (14). These distinctions are useful in discussing Agatha Christie's The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, for at the time of its publication, many fans, who had settled into the "comfortable practice of reading" the sterile, formulaic detective stories popular up to 1926, found themselves "unsettled" by Christie's latest work. Considering common perceptions of bliss and the fact that, in 1926, Barthes had not yet presented his theories on these types of texts, the earliest readers of Christie's novel may have objected to the term being used in connection with their experience of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. In her biography of Agatha Christie, Mary S. Wagoner writes that "the tricky surprise" of the narrative even incited "public furor" (Wagoner 41). Why were some people upset? Douglas R. McManis explains, "Writers of mystery fiction were expected to use a format of prescribed traditions . . ." (319). Christie, however, "broke with many of the early format restrictions" (320). Consequently, some readers at the time objected to the story and accused her of having "violated one of the cardinal rules of fair play" by "deceiving the reader with respect to the identity of the murderer" (Gerald 234 n1). Their reaction indicates a distinction in types of readers that correlates with Barthes types of texts. These "pleasure readers" preferred "a comfortable practice of reading" that entertained and conformed to their previously held beliefs. Christie's construction of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd deviated from this by requiring readers to reconstruct old assumptions. By doing so, it created a "text of bliss" for readers willing to have their expectations challenged by the narrative manipulation. First, this essay will show what methods Christie uses to unsettle readers' assumptions. Then, it will discuss readers' expectations when they come to a text and how these affect their reactions to it. In conclusion, it will show how the narrative devices that created "a text of bliss" could no longer carry the same effect in Christie's subsequent novels, and how, nonetheless, readers are able to entertain a different kind of bliss. In The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, Christie uses several devices that manipulate readers in order to throw them off the path to guessing who the real killer is. The method that caused the uproar, however, was the construction of a narrator that turns out to be the murderer. Russell Fitzgibbon writes that "its critics, both those pro and those con, at once jumped into the battle over the author's fairness" (18). According to Michael Gerald, critics accused Christie "of deceiving the reader" (234 n1). Why does this narrative trick unsettle readers to the point where they reacted as they did? The answer is partially discovered by considering why her method was so successful in diverting readers from recognizing the real murderer. The reader is thrown off course for several reasons. First, in many respects, Christie follows the formulas, methods, and construction of typical detective stories that readers had become familiarized with by reading other similar works. Pierre Bayard, in his book Who Killed Roger Ackroyd: The Mystery Behind the Agatha Christie Mystery, lists some of the "rules of the genre" which Christie follows including not having the criminal play a secondary role in the novel, pitting a "doltish police inspector against a brilliant detective" and, thereby, presenting two different...

Bibliography: Barnard, Robert. A Talent to Deceive: An Appreciation of Agatha Christie. New York:
Dodd, Mead & Company, 1980.
Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill and Wang, 1975.
Christie, Agatha. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd. 1926. New York: Berkley Books, 2000.
Fitzgibbon, Russell. The Agatha Christie Companion. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling
Green State University Popular Press, 1980.
Gerald, Michael C. The Poisonous Pen of Agatha Christie. Austin, TX: University of
Texas Press, 1993.
McManis, Douglas R. Places for Mysteries. Geographical Review. Vol. 68, No.3, pp. 319
-334, Jul., 1978
Wagoner, Mary S. Agatha Christie. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1986.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Unreliable Narrator in Agatha Christie's the Murder of Roger Ackroyd Research Paper
  • The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Essay
  • The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Essay
  • Murder of Roger Ackroyd Essay
  • Focalization in Agatha Christie's The Murder of Rodger Ackroyd Essay
  • Opening Chapters of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Essay
  • The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Essay
  • Reaction Paper on Roger and Me

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free