Preview

Rawls' Difference Principle

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rawls' Difference Principle
Rawls’ Difference Principle

Rawls believed in the ideal of perfect equality. This meant, to him, that everyone should have equal opportunity and receive the same treatment. To Rawls, there was only one reason why anyone should be treated differently to any other person – to help the worst off members of society. He called this reason the difference principle, and in conjunction with his “Justice as Fairness” ideal it formed the basis of his claims about distributive justice.

Rawls’ natural lottery was the biological limitations that one is born with. For example, some people are simply not capable of the intelligence and skill required to be a doctor. Rawls suggests a counter to this natural phenom, asserting that the difference principle is needed to counter the effects of the natural lottery (“The Law Of Peoples” p.114, On Distributive Justice Among People). People who are biologically less able than others would be provided for to the same level as others, but it would take more of society’s resources, so they would need a larger amount than the average person. This would create an inequality in terms of natural assets, but it would create equality in social order. The person who was disadvantaged would be brought to the same level as everyone else because of the excess money given to them.

The difference principle makes sense in a cut and dry hypothetical situation like giving more resources to someone who is biologically disinclined to be successful, but I feel that it fails in a few key areas. Throughout history, society has believed many different things to be biologically inferior to the norm at the time. A prime example is the discrimination that natives of basically any country in the world faced when confronted by settlers. When settlers arrived in Australia, they believed that the natives were biologically incapable of being “civilised”. Applying Rawls’ theory to a situation such as this would not be appropriate, because the resources would be



References: “The Difference Principle”, Political Philosophy . info http://www.politicalphilosophy.info/differenceprinciple.html “The Original Position”, Political Philosophy . info http://www.politicalphilosophy.info/originalposition.html “Justice and Bad Luck” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Jun 20, 2005) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-bad-luck/#2 (“The Law Of Peoples” p.114, On Distributive Justice Among People) John Rawls, 1993 (“A Theory Of Justice”, p.162, Distributive Justice) John Rawls, 1971

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The world we live in is constantly unfair and when looking at from its deepest level there is nothing we can do about it. It is a known fact that some people are born better off than others it is a basic sociological concept. Individuals a born and they are dealt a hand of cards, and they’re life is what they make out of it with those cards that they were dealt. Some would say that those who are better off should help those who were not born in a well to do society, but it is not morally…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3. True or false? Rawls' view of social justice includes people making choices to protect those who are in a lesser position in society.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s a misapplication of the theories of Charles Darwin that said all people are not born equal but some are born winners and some are born losers. They literally believed they were greater human beings compared to the lower classes. A quote that was used greatly by them was, “Life is inherently a struggle with the fit meriting riches and the unfit deserving exploitation and poverty.” They really felt that the poor deserved to be poor and the rich deserved to be richer, no matter what the cost was to society and the greater good of the American people. And when the Social Darwinists said they felt no guilt for what they said or did, a quote used to describe them was, “Men were answerable only to their own consciences and the consciences were well…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bugmy v The Queen

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    “It is a wise man who said that there is no greater inequality than the equal treatment of unequals.”…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) Starting with Rawls’ “original position . . . under the veil of ignorance,” do you think you would arrive at a principle or principles of justice similar to those of Rawls, or if different ones, which? Defend your position. (2) As part of your answer give a clear statement of what Rawls means by the “original position . . . under the veil of…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Veil of Ignorance, Rawls asks us to imagine what rules we would want to exist in the world, assuming that we do not know what kind of life we would have in the world. For example, it assumes that we do not know how we will look like, how much money will we have, or what sexual orientation will we have. In this position, Rawls states that the rationally self-interested person will ask themselves, “what if I were in the position of society’s least advantaged?…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    social justice assignment

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Norman. D (1987:145) explains that “John Rawls is widely known for his theory of justice as fairness, which develops principals of justice to govern a modern social order. Rawls theory provides a frame work that explains the significance, ion society assumed to consist of free and equal persons, of political and personal liberties, of equal opportunities, and cooperative arrangements that benefit the more and the less advantaged members of society.” It can be seen that John Rawls discusses his own theory of social justice,…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rawls, his principles of justice would be at the foundation of an ideal society. He goes on to explain this through a hypothetical situation he calls the “original position”. A person, who finds themselves in this “original position”, can be compared to being a newborn child who just came into the world without knowing anything about themselves, not their abilities, personality, nationality, nor social status. Any person in this “original position” is considered to be acting behind what Rawls’ calls a “veil of ignorance” (Scott, 2003). As they won’t know what their circumstances will be in this society, every person would choose fair principles that will benefit everyone equally. Rawls’ principles of justice consist of two principles, where the first principle states that a person has equal rights to as much liberties as is compatible with the rights of every other person (Scott, 2003). The second principle concerns the fair equality of opportunity, which allows anyone regardless of their background and social status the opportunity and equal right to hold positions in offices that are available to anyone, and the difference principle makes sure that social or economic inequality that occurs between people benefits every single person (Scott,…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Veil Of Ignorance

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    The role of the "veil of ignorance” plays in Rawls' theory of distributive justice is by eliminating bias in society making a fair way of choosing principles (Shaw & Barry, 2016). The veil is put in place so individuals from the original position would make a just decision knowing nothing of their self and their natural abilities, or their position in society. In addition the individual would know nothing of their sex, race, nationality, or individual tastes when making a decision (Shaw & Barry, 2016). Therefore, no one is at an advantage or disadvantage when making up principles in society.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Contract Theories

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The “original position” developed by John Rawls corresponds to Hobbes’ the state of nature theory. A fair original position requires people to choose principles from behind the “veil of ignorance”. Rawls claims, in the original condition, “no one should be advantaged or disadvantaged by natural fortune or social circumstances in the choice of…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Rawls and Robert Nozick

    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages

    John Rawls theory is called Justice as Fairness and was published in Rawls book A Theory of Justice in 1971. The theory is divided into two principles; however Rawls has arranged the principles in order of priority, so as if the two principles were to ever clash then the first principle would take precedent over the second, “These principles are to be arranged in a…

    • 3081 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rawls theory of justice talks about the problem of distributive justice, where the allotment of social primary goods in a society is arranged in a certain way, and opts for a method that focuses attaining equal liberty while giving those worse off a chance to flourish and using the resources of the better off to help the ones worse off. His work tries to put everyone on equal footing from the start, using the veil of ignorance, before deliberating on common principles that will be accepted by all. The deliberation inevitably leads to 2 conclusions, he contends, of everyone having equal rights to basic liberties and of inequalities being arranged so they provide the least advantaged with the greatest benefit while keeping vocations accessible under a fair equality of opportunity,…

    • 3873 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just Deserts

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. USA…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays