Ramzi Attack Case Study
Ramzi Yousef Wali Khan Amin Shah and Abdul Hakim Murad appealed from judgments of conviction presented in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges pertaining to a conspiracy to destroy twelve U.S. commercial airliners in Southeast Asia.
Ramzi Yousef entered into the U.S. airliners, to stage his attacks. Ramzi mission sent him to place bombs within twelve U.S. aircraft which headed in the direction of Southeast Asia by five members. The conspirators made sure that they were passengers on the plane. The terrorist had put together, bombs during the flight and at resting point during the first stop, the bombers use this stop to exit. The plans were found two weeks before the attack took place. Yousef and Murad accidentally began a fire while burning chemicals in their Manila apartment. The first responders on the scene was the fire department, then they teamed up with the police …show more content…
government followed proper proceedings as they were implementing their authority by trying an alleged terrorist in the United States, However; the criminal behavior took place outside the United States. One of the main problems concerning this case was the airliners was utilized.
Rule:
The US government had a job to fulfilled because the law had been broken and Yousef and his partners had went through with trying to destroy and hurt people had as their plans came apart in the front of their eyes. The government has a right to prosecute any individual who has plan to take away life and liberty from people everywhere.
Analysis:
The Tokyo Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft normally regulates jurisdiction pertaining to crimes performed on aircraft International law. The law has states that there is a genuine connection in partnership with the state and the aircraft in order for the state to lawfully have jurisdiction over crimes committed on board.
Ramzi Yousef entered into the U.S. airliners, to stage his attacks. Ramzi mission sent him to place bombs within twelve U.S. aircraft which headed in the direction of Southeast Asia by five members. The conspirators made sure that they were passengers on the plane. The terrorist had put together, bombs during the flight and at resting point during the first stop, the bombers use this stop to exit. The plans were found two weeks before the attack took place. Yousef and Murad accidentally began a fire while burning chemicals in their Manila apartment. The first responders on the scene was the fire department, then they teamed up with the police …show more content…
government followed proper proceedings as they were implementing their authority by trying an alleged terrorist in the United States, However; the criminal behavior took place outside the United States. One of the main problems concerning this case was the airliners was utilized.
Rule:
The US government had a job to fulfilled because the law had been broken and Yousef and his partners had went through with trying to destroy and hurt people had as their plans came apart in the front of their eyes. The government has a right to prosecute any individual who has plan to take away life and liberty from people everywhere.
Analysis:
The Tokyo Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft normally regulates jurisdiction pertaining to crimes performed on aircraft International law. The law has states that there is a genuine connection in partnership with the state and the aircraft in order for the state to lawfully have jurisdiction over crimes committed on board.