Preview

Rainsford Character Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rainsford Character Analysis
In the making of the story “The Most Dangerous Game” it is evident that the author, Richard Connell, spent a great deal of time formulating the characters and how they would affect the story. The way the characters act also builds on the theme of the story. In the beginning of the story, we get introduced to the main character, Rainsford. In the story, Rainsford would be considered a protagonist because he is the person that we are focused on and he would be considered the good guy. As the story moves on we notice that Rainsford seems to be the sensible human being that posses morality for others. It is evident when he would not hunt humans for sport even though it meant he would get hunted as if he were in a game. You can clearly see Rainsford is the more sensible person when Zaroff, another skilled hunter, and Rainsford discuss the issue of hunting humans, "I can't believe you are serious, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke." "Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting." "Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder." When Rainsford …show more content…
Zaroff is a Cossack that is obsessed with hunting. He has hunted all around the world and killed all the big game. He had gotten bored with the all the other animals and decided to make a new one, which were humans. This creates the problem in the story as Rainsford believes killing humans is cold blooded murder and Zaroff sees no problem in it. He even tries to justify it when he said, “The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong. Why should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels--a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them." Rainsford and Zaroff were both extremely good hunters, but in the end Rainsford proves to be the better hunter and Zaroff gets

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ultimately Zaroff can be characterized as Mysterious and cruel. First off one way Zaroff is mysterious is he already knows who Rainsford is without ever meeting each other before. Conelle page 44, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home… I am General Zaroff.” As you can see from this quote Zaroff is excited to meet Rainsford and immediately wants to get to know him better. My second reason is Zaroff acts strange in general around Rainsford. Conelle page 44 “The menacing look in his eyes did not change… a black uniform trimmed with gray astrakhan.” By this quote you can tell Rainsford is feeling uncertain and curious of him. You can also tell by his first reaction he is in some…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, Rainsford, the main character, goes through hard times because he is forced to transition from a hunter to a huntee, then back to a hunter. As he uses his many strengths and his knowledge from both perspectives, he creates a plan and ends up beating the whole game despite all of his conflicts. In all likelihood, this wouldn't happen in real life, but we can still learn from him. Throughout the story, the reader witnesses how Rainsford's character struggles with different conflicts with his enemy,…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two men don’t feel bad for hunting and taking their prey’s life. As shown when Rainsford remarks, “Who cares how a Jaguar feels, (1)”. Also, how General Zaroff who has already taken many animals lives, then proclaims, “I had to invent a new animal to hunt,” (8). Both examples show how both Rainsford and Zaroff show no empathy for murdering the animals as well as the humans. Therefore, Zaroff and Rainsford alike in the way they hunt. Another way Zaroff and Rainsford are alike is their belief that the world is divided into two classes. Zaroff’s theory being the world is divided by strong/weak. Zaroff states his opinion, “Life is for the strong...The weak were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (9). As for Rainsford’s perspective, he believes, “The world is made up of two classes, the hunted/huntee.” Both men believe that in the world, you're either one or the other. Furthermore, both men show identical qualities after Rainsford kills Zaroff when he sleeps in his bed, “He had never slept in a better bed.” (16). This shows that Rainsford now believes he has the power that Zaroff once had and accepts that he is now like Zaroff. In addition, they both are alike because when…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People’s characteristics and actions can determine what will happen to them. This is true in Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford’s key characteristics such as his creativeness, toughness, and moral values are crucial to his survival.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff starts to explain to Rainsford how hunting animal’s no longer gives him a thrill, but Rainsford is confused as Zaroff explains what type of creatures he now hunts. After a lengthy conversation at the dinner table, Zaroff gets to the point and says, “It must have courage, cunning, and above all, it must be able to reason.” (Connell). It is here where Rainsford realizes it is humans that Zaroff has moved on to and suddenly Rainsford begins to fear for his life. Zaroff wants a challenge, because all the men he is hunting are making it too easy, so he believes Rainsford will give him a challenge, since he is a hunter himself. Zaroff now makes a deal with Rainsford, “I’ll cheerfully acknowledge myself defeat if I do not find you by midnight of the third day – my sloop will place you on the mainland near a town.” (Connell). If he wants to make it off this island he will need to survive Zaroffs three-day game. Rainsford is sent into the huge jungle with no direction of where he is and all he has is food, clothes, and a knife. The game has now…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While one may look at Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" and Ernest Hemmingway's "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber" and pass them off as basically the same, he should be reminded of the cliché "don't judge a book by its cover." Although both are short stories, each work encompasses a number of elements that are characteristically associated with either commercial or literary fiction. By evaluating the author's use of elements of fiction, such as plot, theme, and characterization, and the literary devices diction, figurative language, and detail, one can come to the conclusion that neither story is better than the other.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Zaroff considers himself civilized. Went Zaroff said, “ You see, I read all books on hunting published in English, French, and Russian.”(p.g 45) Show how he interest about hunting. When you love something you just want to find or learn about the thing that you like. Zaroff have electricity on the island, and show that he can do everything no matter where he is. Zaroff describes his servant Ivan as savage,…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: Both “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne have similarities and differences when it comes to characterization and setting. Richard Connell and Nathaniel Hawthorne both illustrate a great sense of fear and evil in both of these short stories, as well as good morals.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suspense is a necessity for any story, facilitating a reason for readers to continue flipping the pages. A powerful literary device indeed, but it is exceptionally hard to master. However, noted author Richard Connell is one of the exceptions. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Connell, the nigh palpable conflict between the characters is certainly a key reason to turn the pages. Through the utilization of foreshadowing and foreboding words, Connell constructs a rock-solid sense of suspense.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Everyday I hunt, and I never grow bored now, for I have a quarry of which I can match my wits, (8).” Zaroff speaks his mind about how bored he is with hunting animals. Rainsford hunts animals because he loves the sport of hunting. “It’s the best sport in the world,” as Rainsford calls it. Considering what both men say, it shows they have different morals about hunting and life. Those two points of view about hunting go against each other as Zaroff challenges Rainsford to hunt. Another main way General Zaroff and Rainsford aren’t alike is that General Zaroff believes that humans are on the Earth to provide himself entertainment and Rainsford believes they deserve respect. General Zaroff says, “ I hunt the scum of the Earth: sailors from tramp ships--lassars, blacks, Chinese, Whites, mongrels--...,(9).” To rephrase it, Zaroff obviously gives no consideration about human life as he shows in the story. Rainsford believes the opposite of that, he says, “But they are men, (9).” in response to what Zaroff says.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the film, Rainsford and the general start off on the same foot. They are alike. As the film continues, the general differs in his character. He transitions into a cruel and dark figure and loses the softer side of himself. For Rainsford, he learns to become brave. At first, Rainford is seen, experienced in fear and the struggle to survive. His feelings are more sensitive when he undergoes and internal change of the preys feelings. He learns to develop a stronger sense of humor and becomes more…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard Connell, the author of, "The Most Dangerous Game," depicts the theme, the most dangerous things are often well hidden; you never fully know how dangerous something is until it is right in your face and the hints are all out. Mr. Zaroff is the perfect example of how the most dangerous things are well hidden; in the article he says, "' I had to invent a new animal to hunt.'...'...It must have courage, cunning, and above all it must be able to reason.'" this shows that the most dangerous things are often well hidden because the animal he is talking about is humans; we are the the smartest species in the world. General Zaroff is hinting at the fact that he is hunting humans, Mr. Rainsford is not quite picking up on the hint…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sable Quean

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This might be the point author Brian Jacques was trying to get across. When Zwilt The Shade and his army of Ravagers arrived at Redwall, Buckler tied to play words rather than physical combat. This was because you need to be able to choose your own battles. If you are careful in your actions, and don’t act in blind haste, you can come out on top, achieving your goals. Zwilt The Shade went on to fire out insults. This did not scathe Buckler, he kept a level head. But this is only so tolerable. Zwilt openly talked of how he could so easily murder the captives, one of which shown was the child of Buckler’s slain brother, Clerun. The hare let his emotions get out of control. “Buckler tore down the walls stairs and unbarred the main gate, calling to Diggs, who had followed him.” Buckler told Diggs to lock the gate behind him and sped off with his goal in mind, kill the Sable. This shows that many are often easily triggered by someone doing something against their liking. Buckler’s emotions gained more power than his judgement, resulting in poor decisions. Letting our emotions get the best of us in often seen in the real world, especially in the population that these books are aimed at, young adults. Brian Jacques continued to show how Buckler acted in a clouded place of state. “Buckler did his best to provoke Zwilt to a fight. “You dirty, rotten stinkin’ murderin’…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays