Top-Rated Free Essay

Racial Profiling

Good Essays
Friday, October 18, 2013
Racial Profiling
Most people believe that they deserve the rights they are gained by the government. An upstanding citizen who pays their taxes, serves their community and abides by the law should be afforded the rights of an American. However, not all citizens are afforded equal rights. Gay and lesbians are consistently denied rights that are typically taken for granted by the average American. Specifically, gay and lesbian couples are denied the right to marry even if they are upstanding citizens. They are held at an unfair disadvantage solely because of their sexual orientation. This discrimination must stop because gay and lesbian couples are law-abiding citizens too, who should be afforded the same rights as heterosexual couples.
One common problem that plagues gay and lesbian couples that are denied the right to marry is their inability to claim their partner’s social security after he or she is dead. The Human Rights Campaign, which work to achieve equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, is supporting the effort to attain survivor benefits for domesticate partners. They believe, “Any alteration to the Social Security system must include partners of gays and lesbians in its definition of survivor” Currently, there are no programs that give homosexuals survivor benefits like the ones that are provided for heterosexuals who are married or divorced. Gay and lesbian partners are not able to claim benefits of their decease, regardless of the fact that all working citizens’ heterosexuals or homosexual pay into the Social Security system for survivor benefits. Sadly, this leaves many gay and lesbian couples with an unstable retirement. The most disturbing fact is that even though homosexuals and heterosexuals pay the government for survivor benefits, even people who divorced can even claim survivor benefits whereas a lifelong gay/lesbian partner cannot. This is blatant discrimination against people of different sexual orientation. This is only one example of how the government’s refusal to recognize same-sex marriage denies homosexuals rights that supposedly protected by the state.
The ones who suffer the greatest repercussions of such prejudices are the children of gay and lesbian couples. Non-biological children of gays and lesbian cannot receive survivor benefits if the deceased partner did not legally adopt them. Although how is this related to whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Same-sex couples do have the privilege of adopting children to begin a family of their own. However, they are often rejected because of their unmarried status. Even if the government does not wish to provide some financial security for homosexual couples, it should not punish the children of such relationships. The government directly discriminates against the children of same-sex marriages by not allowing them the same rights as children who have heterosexual parents. Children do not choose who their parents are regardless of your stance on the issue. The Human Rights Campaign has adopted the idea that, “any change must also define survivor to include non-biological children of gays and lesbians found in the changing American family”. This is absolutely necessary because it is absurd that innocent children are being denied basic rights due to the sexual orientation of their parents. Death is a painful enough experience; nobody should have to worry about their financial standings with the government after dealing with the loss of a loved one, let alone, a child. Survivor Benefits must include same-sex unions only because it denies homosexuals rights that are regularly afforded to heterosexual couples; but because the children of these relationships are being discriminated against as well.
The fight is for gay and lesbian couples to gain legal recognition, not religious recognition. Even most people against same sex marriages agree that they do not hate gays they just disagree with their lifestyle because their religious beliefs and church affiliation. The battle to legalize same sex is not trying to infringe upon the beliefs of the churches. These unions are to be recognized by the state, not by all churches. This is a debate over whether or not people of different sexual orientations are to be viewed equally in the eyes of the government, and will be accepted into mainstream America.
However, some people argue that same-sex marriage would be tolerable if they were confined to their own communities. That way the general public would not be “subjected” to their practices. Gay people are not lepers. We cannot isolate a fraction of the population and force them to live in designed areas. This idea parallels the concept of moving all the Native Americans onto reservations. Thinking such as this is archaic and regresses back to another closely related idea: segregation. Do people really want to repeat one of the largest injustices of American history? As established by the segregation trials during the 1960’s and 1970’s, separate but equal is not equal. It creates a division and difference.
The trials that are now finally questioning the treatment of gay and lesbian couples are easily compared to those of inter-racial marriages. One example is the famous case of loving vs. Virginia. In the case, a white man and black women were married In Washington D.C.: however, their home state of Virginia forced to recognize the marriage and exiled them for twenty years. Later when they took the state of Virginia to court it was then decided that they could not be denied the right to live where they pleased due to their inter-racial marriage. This court decision is arguably one of the strongest forces in nation-wide legal recognition of inter-racial marriages; it is evident that the same-sex civil unions that are now being recognized in Vermont are slowly making the way for the other states to join the movement. The Baker vs. Vermont case is a strong reminder of the troubles America once faced. Separate but equal is inherently unequal and unfair.
Therefore, it is necessary to set aside religious issues to look at this debate from legal standpoint. It is necessary that the government recognize the civil unions of same sex couples because all citizens of the United States should be afforded equal rights regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation. It is because of this legal discrimination that homosexuals are denied such rights as hospital visitation, social security and disability insurances. Discrimination is completely and utterly wrong. The first step in correcting social injustices must be taken soon. The issue of legal marriage between two people of the same sex must be settled now to stop the discrimination that is openly occurring across America.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Against Racial Profiling and/or other forms of profiling in dealing with security and immigration issues. Group Members: Shay, Bryce, Brandon, Ariana Opening Argument Main Argument: Racial profiling is defined as the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin by the American civil Liberties union. How can something that… Racial profiling violates our constitutional…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Profiling based on race has become a prevalent method that cops and authority figures use to arrest or question an individual. Racial profiling is most noticed on the highways and in airports. Racial profiling occurs when law enforcement or security officials, consciously or unconsciously, subject individuals at any location to heightened scrutiny based solely or in part on race, ethnicity, aboriginality, place of origin, ancestry, or religion, or on stereotypes associated with any of these factors…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Racial Profiling A person should not be judged due to their appearance. Today skin color makes you a suspect in America. It makes you more likely to be stopped, more likely to be searched, and more likely to be arrested and imprisoned. When police officers stop or charge a person based on their race; that’s racial profiling. Racial profiling has been occurring around the nation for years. Statistics show that if a Caucasian man and an African American man are both driving a nice car and speeding…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Racial Profiling The definition of racial profiling is prejudging someone by their ethnicity or racial profile based on the stereotypes that an ethnic group may carry. Racial profiling acknowledgement in America has grown rapidly over time and has really been on the rise since the September 11, 2001 bombings of the Twin Towers in New York City and of the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. But is racial profiling defensible to the American public policy? Some people think like Scott Johnson…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    defines racial profiling as a police-initiated action relying on race or ethnicity besides the behavior of any individual who is suspected of engaging in criminal activity. Amnesty international, on the other hand, defines racial profiling as the use of race, ethnicity, and religion, to target individuals or groups by law enforcement officers because of lack of trustworthy information linking the aforementioned groups to crime or a scheme (Leonard…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eng 101 Research Paper 03/27/2012 Racial Profiling Racial Profiling exists in today’s society. It has become a serious issue within communities. Racial Profiling can be defined as the practice of subjecting citizens to increased surveillance or scrutiny based on racial or ethnic factors rather than “reasonable suspicion”. Over the years, police and other law enforcement officials have come under fire for using this practice. The issue of racial profiling is determining whether it helps with…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Racial profiling should not exist in today’s society To begin I would like to state that I believe racial profiling does not work on many levels. Racial profiling is morally wrong mainly based on Middle Easterners, African Americans and Hispanics. I also believe that it may be considered as an act of antagonism. Racial profiling does nothing but provoke hostilities and create tension between the races. It creates various sociological problems and a turbulent environment. Racial profiling entails…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial profiling.

    • 1560 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are several controversial issues surrounding racial profiling and the various problems that are encountered as a result of it. One issue is whether or not racial profiling exists. Most law enforcement departments refuse to undergo a study and they deny that racial profiling exists. These problems, coupled with the status of literature regarding this topic at this point, are more unreliable than scientific. In addition, the topic is controversial because the United States believes that it has…

    • 1560 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    of over 1,200 people in planned civil disobedience. In a trial that was moved out of the community where Diallo lived and to Albany in upstate New York, the four officers who killed Diallo were acquitted of all charges (“The Diallo” online). Racial Profiling is any police or private security practice in which a person is treated as a suspect because of his or her race, ethnicity, nationality or religion. This occurs when police investigate, stop, frisk, search or use force against a person based…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case for Racial Profiling the issue of racial profiling takes many shapes and forms. It is an issue that most of the free word is dealing with on a daily basis. In the United States racial profiling has been a hotly debated issue for many years. It has been reemphasized even more following the three separate terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001 that killed about 2,996 people. From its extreme form to the moderate, racial profiling is being defined as using a person's race as a factor…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays