Rachel Dolezal And My Napoleon Complex Analysis
The article “Rachel Dolezal and my Napoleon complex” by Damon Linker indicates the overall of Hegel’s philosophy to be adapted and related to Rachel Dolezal as an effective reasoning to his explanation. The author leans toward the credibility of Hegel’s philosophy. His subjective argument is the ideal of your mind and reality is the thought of the world, not what you think is to be truth. Meaning that the world has to accept your idealistic if that is only to be truth. The absolute truth belongs to the world; it is not existing in one’s mind. It is called delusional. Damon Linker claim himself as Napoleon, indeed, he “feel like [he’s] a native French speaker even though [he] can’t actually speak French” (Linker). That’s like Dolezal feel black
…show more content…
The author leans toward the credibility of Hegel’s philosophy. His subjective argument is the ideal of your mind and reality is the thought of the world, not what you think is to be truth. Meaning that the world has to accept your idealistic if that is only to be truth. The absolute truth belongs to the world; it is not existing in one’s mind. It is called delusional. Damon Linker claim himself as Napoleon, indeed, he “feel like [he’s] a native French speaker even though [he] can’t actually speak French” (Linker). That’s like Dolezal feel black but actually she’s non other than white. In the relationship to his Napoleon complex, Linker compares himself and Dolezal as one; saying that he’s only Napoleon “depends on whether other people recognize me as Napoleon” (Linker). As Dolezal identifies herself as black and if everyone would have denied the truth to her identification, even though she feels black doesn’t change the fact that she’s white (Linker). Pathos-siding with Dolezal on how he thinks as Napoleon is different than thinking of a woman when he has a penis is fine. when he thinks him as Napoleon is Linker like Dolezal think she’s is black when she’s white is unacceptable. Simply think that we are all accept Jenner as a woman because we allow her to be so, yet oppose to Dolezal as black just because we don’t want to let her be with no
The author leans toward the credibility of Hegel’s philosophy. His subjective argument is the ideal of your mind and reality is the thought of the world, not what you think is to be truth. Meaning that the world has to accept your idealistic if that is only to be truth. The absolute truth belongs to the world; it is not existing in one’s mind. It is called delusional. Damon Linker claim himself as Napoleon, indeed, he “feel like [he’s] a native French speaker even though [he] can’t actually speak French” (Linker). That’s like Dolezal feel black but actually she’s non other than white. In the relationship to his Napoleon complex, Linker compares himself and Dolezal as one; saying that he’s only Napoleon “depends on whether other people recognize me as Napoleon” (Linker). As Dolezal identifies herself as black and if everyone would have denied the truth to her identification, even though she feels black doesn’t change the fact that she’s white (Linker). Pathos-siding with Dolezal on how he thinks as Napoleon is different than thinking of a woman when he has a penis is fine. when he thinks him as Napoleon is Linker like Dolezal think she’s is black when she’s white is unacceptable. Simply think that we are all accept Jenner as a woman because we allow her to be so, yet oppose to Dolezal as black just because we don’t want to let her be with no