I. Argument
Republic Act No. 10175 curtails a persons freedom of expression. People do not have the right to dictate other people’s actions.
II. Evidence As stated in Section 19 of RA 10175, “Restricting or Blocking Access to Computer Data. — When a computer data is prima facie found to be in violation of the provisions of this Act, the DOJ shall issue an order to restrict or block access to such computer data.” this will enable the government to delete any data they find libellous, even if the data is not libellous as long as the government says so, the data will be taken down. Freedom of expression enables the citizens to raise their opinions and concerns to the government so that the government will be aware of the changes they need to do for the citizens to be more comfortable. III. Analysis Corruption is inevitable in the government. It has been proven that the Philippine government is one of the most corrupt governments in the world. The government would do anything to look good to the citizens. They would even take down any information that would make them look bad. Despite having advantages such as punishing those who commit hacking and theft, RA 10175 curtails a person’s freedom of expression. Everyone needs the freedom to express their opinions to the government. Expressing opinions will help the government change for the better, for they know what the people think they should do, which will help the entire community but RA 10175 will enable the government to take down any data in the internet they think is libellous. IV. Sources:
Unknown (2012, September 12). Republic Act No. 10175. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republicactno10175/ Unknown (2012, October 8). CYBERCRIME LAW 101: 12 dangers of RA 10175. Retrieved from: http://kabataanpartylist.com/blog/cybercrimelaw10112thingsyouneedtoknowaboutra10175/ Virani, Maahir (2012) Corruption Avoidable or Inevitable?. Retrieved from: http://www.publishyourarticles.net/knowledgehub/essay/corruptionavoidableorinevitableessay.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“This bill would require state agencies and businesses that maintain computer data systems that contain personal information to disclose, as specified, any breach of the security of the systems, as defined, to any person whose personal information was, or may have been, accessed by an unauthorized person. This bill would also make a statement of legislative findings and declarations regarding privacy and financial security (SB 1386 Senate Bill – AMENDED, 2000).”…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Identify legislation and codes of practice that relate to handling information in health and social care…
- 767 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Legislation is the most important restriction placed on organisations. There are many laws that affect the delivery of customer service. Implications of these on customer service can include products or services meeting the regulations and that staff need to know and follow clear procedures in order to remain compliant to the legalisations; these procedures must be put in place by organisations and all staff should be trained in these procedures. Breach of these laws can result in fines, compensation, loss of reputation and even imprisonment.…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* S.319 (2) des not overly restrict freedom of expression. It ensures that only openly hostile expression is affected…
- 4637 Words
- 19 Pages
Good Essays -
7. Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There is also Freedom of Information Act 2000 (that came to effect in 2005) this includes…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
However freedom of speech is not absolute. The word “abridging” in the Free Speech Clause suggests that government cannot deprive the right to freedom of speech; but at the same time the suggestion is unclear about whether the government can put restrictions on how “free” the speech can be. Most people when mention the word “speech”, usually have the tendency to think of spoken words and often neglect the existence of…
- 2295 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The government needs to know what its citizens want, in order to concede to their wishes. A people-fearing government should desire to discover its citizens' wishes at any cost. Therefore, it should respond to most, if not all letters and e-mails it receives. Such a response will make the…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The First Amendment guarantees every American’s right to the free exchange of ideas, beliefs, and political debate. The First Amendment of the Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (National Archives and Records Administration 2001). We have the right of freedom of speech and by definition, this means that we have “the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint” (Dictionary). This law is stated in the Bill of Rights and has been around since 1971. It is one of the oldest and most important amendments we adopted because as American people we have a…
- 1792 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The use of the first amendment to protect some individuals’ rights, but deny the same right of expression to others calls into question the validity of such laws/statutes. As the First Amendment assures the people the freedom of speech, press, religion,…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of press; or the right of people…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
. . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" in today's meaning is that the gov't may not jail, fine, or impose civil liability on a person or organization except in exceptional circumstances. The First Amendment does not protect speakers, however, against private individuals or organizations, such as private employers, private colleges, or private landowners as it only restrains the gov't. The Supreme Court has interpreted “speech” and “press” broadly as covering not only talking, writing, and printing. It also covers also broadcasting, using the Internet, and other forms of expression and also applies to displaying flags, burning flags, wearing armbands, burning crosses. The Supreme Court has held restrictions on content but if a law prohibits the people from criticizing a war, opposing abortion, or advocating high taxes it might be problematic as it distorts public debate and contradict a basic principle of…
- 948 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As in the case of Ferreira v Levin NO, where Chaskalson P held that the allegation need merely be that, objectively speaking, a right in the Bill of Rights has been infringed or threatened, this case, the right of freedom of expression in being violated. The right which is infringed upon is not emotional, but objective.…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays