The person who had to pay for the crime was the defendant who actually performed the illegal activities as the law did not allow other people to be punished. When Congress passed the RICO Act in 1970, the prosecutors were able to have the fighting tool that enabled them to dismantle the organized crimes which were led by the mastermind. Prosecutors had to prove two illegal activities which will assist in bringing these leaders or masterminds to justice. The first was “The defendant must own and/or manage and organization; and the organization must regularly perform one or more specific illegal activity,” …show more content…
“On November 10, 2009, four creditors of a Miami, Florida, law firm of seventy attorneys, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. (“RRA”), petitioned the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to reorganize the law firm under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Two weeks later, the Bankruptcy Court appointed Herbert Stettin trustee of the bankruptcy estate (the “Trustee”). On December 1, 2009, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida filed a five-count information charging Scott Rothstein, “a shareholder, Chairman and CEO of RRA,” with conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), by employing RRA to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, principally mail and wire fraud and money laundering, and with conspiring to commit those substantive offenses” 717 F.3d 1205, 1206-07 (11th Cir.