Preview

questions for final exam

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
questions for final exam
STUDY QUESTIONS for Final Exam Phil 2925 December 2013 Short answer questions
1. Cover distinguishes between a static and dynamic view of law: how does this help a judge who accepts Cover’s view avoid some conflicts between law and morality?
2. In what ways is Starry Vere like Lemuel Shaw/
3. What are the three values of free expression cited by the Canadian Supreme Court?
4. When is sexual representation obscene, according to Canadian law?
5. What are sections 1, 15, and 27 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
6. Explain the 4 constitutional principles the Court affirms in QSR ?
7. What is a reference procedure? How does the Court understand legality and legitimacy?
8. What is a nuisance, and how, according to Feinberg, does one apply the law regulating nuisances? What does the law protect?
9. Explain the 2 senses of “moral” according to Dworkin. How does he use the distinction to criticize Devlin? 10. What is required by Canadian law in order to plead self-defense?
11. What are 3 possible meanings of “reasonable person”? Which is the Law’s?
12. What is the difference between an anthropological use of the term “morality” and our ordinary notion of a “moral” position, according to Dworkin?

13. Why does the Law speak of a reasonable belief rather than a true belief, and why not an honest belief?

14a. Explain Kenealy’s claim that the reasoning is “strange” for introducing the reasonable woman standard for sexual harassment and that it involves a false assumption.
14b Is it victory for gender equality to assess workplace sexual harassment from the perspective of a reasonable woman?

15. What is the principle of comity?

16. *What blocks the claim of unjust enrichment” in Mack?

17. According to R. v. Butler, what conditions must a publication satisfy if it is to count as obscene?

18. In R. v. Keegstra, McLachlin argues that Canada’s hate speech law 319(2) will have a ‘chilling effect’ on expression in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    *McKercher, William Russel. The U.S. Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council, 1983.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This was commissioned by Palla Strozzi for his family burial chapel. The Adoration of the Magi marks the moment when the infant Christ was first shown to the Gentiles. The theme and the garments of the Magi were appropriate to a sacristy where the clergy dressed themselves and prepared for saying the Mass, during which Christ becomes manifest in the Eucharist on the altar. The frame recalls earlier Gothic examples but the forms are now unified by an exuberant vitality, combined with greater depth and naturalism. The left and right gables feature roundels of the Annunciation, while in the central gable a youthful God blesses the scene; and the prophets recline in the spandrels. In the predella, the Nativity, the Flight into Egypt, and the Presentation in the Temple appear almost as one continuous strip. Three small scenes in the arges of the main panel narrate moments in the journey of the Magi to Bethlehem. In the left arch the Magi gaze at the star, in the center the kings ride up on a road toward Jerusalem, and on the right they are about to enter the town of Bethlehem. The cave is evident, along with ox, ass, and manger, and the modest family. The oldest Magus prostrates himself before the Jesus with his own crown on the ground; the second kneels and lifts his crown; the youngest waits his turn. Attendants crowd the space along with animals.…

    • 7739 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada, after a failed appeal in the Court of Appeal, issues concerning whether the non-universal proclamation of S. 234.1 of the Criminal Code infringed on the right to equality before the law, as outlined in S. 1 (b) of the Bill of Rights, the second issue raised in the lower courts was whether the random stopping of cars by police officers infringed on the right not to be arbitrarily detained described by S. 9 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and another major issue raised in the lower courts was whether Mr. Hufsky’s rights were infringed upon…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Flq Crisis

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Opposition leader Robert Stanfelid said: "…what I consider to be the small importance Canadians seemed to attach to civil liberties and the willingness with which they were prepared to see the government kick Quebcers around"70…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Review the Sexual Harassment Tutorial found in the lecture. After viewing the Sexual Harassment Tutorial, completing the reading, and reviewing the lecture notes in conjunction with the TCO, answer the following questions about the tutorial scenario and facts.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. How did the Supreme Court define obscenity in the case of Miller v. California?…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michelle Vinson sued her supervisor for sexual harassment because she had been raped by him over a period of 2 years. She argued that having to tolerate forced sex to keep her job was environmental sexual harassment. (Wilma) Men and women differ in their perceptions of sexual harassment. Women believe more behaviors to be harassing than men. Sexual harassment is an ongoing problem in the workplace. An employer who objects to aggressiveness in women but whose positions require that trait places women in intolerable and impermissible catch. A requirement that a man or woman run a gauntlet of sexual abuse in return for the privilege of being allowed to work and make a living can be as demining and disconcerting as the harshest of racial epithets. 44% of women and 19% of men reported having experienced having experienced some form of unwanted sexual attention at work. Studies show that the most prevalent form of sexual harassment involves men harassing women.(Conn)Researchers have argued that sexual harassment occurs because of their low status in labor markets and in occupational structure. Not all sexual interactions are harmful. Workers experience sexual behaviors differently. Some think sexual interactions are enjoyable or fun, while others think they’re…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richards, David A. J. “Melville B. Nimmer Symposium: Article: A Theory of Free Speech” UCLA Law Review, 1987…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: The appellant, Martineau, was convicted of second-degree murder under s. 213(a) and (d) of the Criminal Code but the decision was overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal who concluded that s. 213(a) violated ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and could no longer be in effect. The issue was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada whether or not the appeal court was correct in overturning the decision made at trial.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will convey to the reader all relevant information to the in both a logical and entertaining fashion. My paper will be interesting as well as factual, and will provide the reader with information which should enhance their knowledge of sexual harassment in the work place.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada Charter Of Rights

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    More than 30 years ago today, one of the most significant developments in the protection of human rights in Canada was signed and entrenched in the Canadian Constitution under the leadership of then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Coming into force on April 17, 1982, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the most visible and recognized part of the Canadian Constitution and is intended to protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada from the policies and actions of all levels of government. Since its enactment in 1982, the Charter has had a powerful influence on Canadian federalism, while also communicating true independence from the former British colony. The introduction of the Charter of Rights has undoubtedly assisted Canadians…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: MAJEROL, V., & Liptak, A. (2011). The Bill of Rights, Then & Now. New York Times Upfront, 144(7), 18-21.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sexual harassment has been a problem throughout history not only for women but for men as well, but the focus of this paper will be on sexual harassment towards women in the workplace. Over the years, legislators have won the vote of sexual harassment being defined as sexual discrimination, in other words, treating someone of any race unfairly because of their gender. The word sexual harassment is not…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays