ARTICLE IN PRESS
Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 14 (2008) 170– 179
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pursup
Cooperating and competing in supply networks: Making sense of a triadic sourcing strategy Anna Dubois Ã, Peter Fredriksson 1
Division of Industrial Marketing, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
a r t i c l e in f o
Article history: Received 20 June 2007 Received in revised form 15 May 2008 Accepted 18 May 2008 Keywords: Sourcing strategy Triads Cooperation Competition Supply networks
a b s t r a c t
This paper introduces the concept of a ‘‘triadic sourcing strategy’’. Triadic sourcing is a way for buying companies to nurture and beneﬁt from cooperation and competition between two suppliers with partially overlapping capabilities. In contrast to hybrid sourcing strategies outlined in the literatureparallel and network sourcing—the distinctive feature of triadic sourcing is that the buyer actively creates interdependencies between two suppliers. To illustrate this principle and the characteristics of triadic sourcing, Volvo Cars’ use of two suppliers of seats is described. The paper asserts that triadic sourcing is a dynamic sourcing strategy that contributes to efﬁciency and innovation for the buyer and the two suppliers, together forming a triad that is subject to ﬁrm interdependence and network embeddedness. & 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Sourcing strategies have been on top of the agenda in the area of industrial purchasing for a long time (Kraljic, 1983; Gadde and ˚ Hakansson, 1993; Ellram and Carr, 1994; Cousins and Spekman, 2003; Day and Lichtenstein, 2006; Ventovuori, 2006). In view of developments towards reducing the numbers of suppliers and increasing the content in the relationships with the remaining ones (Cousins, 1999; von Corswant and Fredriksson, 2002; ¨ ¨ Kemppainen and Vepsalainen, 2003; Sarkar and Mohapatra, 2006), the pros and cons of single and multiple sourcing have been debated and reviewed (see for example Lamming et al., 2000; Helper, 1991; Richardson, 1993; De Toni and Nassimbeni, 1999; Zeng, 2000). In addition to these ‘‘extreme’’ forms of sourcing strategies, hybrid forms such as ‘‘parallel sourcing’’ (Richardson, 1993) and ‘‘network sourcing’’ (Hines, 1995, 1996) have been proposed. These aim at combining the beneﬁts of single and multiple sourcing, by allowing for competition between suppliers, while also maintaining cooperation between the buyer and each supplier, respectively. The aim of this paper is to introduce another and different hybrid sourcing strategy: ‘‘triadic sourcing’’. Triadic sourcing is a way for buying companies to nurture and beneﬁt from
cooperation and competition between two suppliers with partially overlapping capabilities. In contrast to the hybrid strategies of parallel and network sourcing, the distinctive feature of triadic sourcing is that the buyer actively creates and encourages interdependencies between two suppliers. The triadic sourcing strategy hence relies on the assumption that companies may beneﬁt from interdependencies to other actors. To illustrate the assumptions and the key aspects of triadic sourcing, the case of Volvo Cars’ sourcing of seats is presented. This exemplary case shows how a buying company can foster a creative tension between cooperation and competition between two interdependent suppliers through a sophisticated and dynamic division of labor between them. The next section presents a literature review of parallel and network sourcing and the basis for triadic sourcing. Thereafter, the case is presented. Triadic sourcing is then deﬁned as a sourcing strategy, followed by managerial implications for buyers and suppliers.
2. Hybrid sourcing strategies 2.1. Parallel and network sourcing Parallel sourcing...
References: Araujo, L., Dubois, A., Gadde, L.-E., 1999. Managing interfaces with suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management 28 (5), 497–506. Alchain, A.A., Demsetz, H., 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review 62, 777–795. ˚ Anderson, J.C., Hakansson, H., Johanson, J., 1994. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing 58 (4), 1–15. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S., 2000. ‘‘Coopetition’’ in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management 29, 411–426. Carson, P.P., Carson, K.D., Knouse, S.B., Roe, C.W., 2004. Balance theory applied to service quality: a focus on the organization, provider, and consumer triad. Journal of Business and Psychology 12 (2), 99–120. Choi, T.Y., Hong, Y., 2002. Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management 20 (5), 469–493. Cousins, P.D., 1999. Supply base rationalisation: myth or reality? European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 5, 143–155. Cousins, P.D., Spekman, R., 2003. Strategic supply and the management of interand intra-organisational relationships. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9, 19–29. Cox, A., 1999. The art of the possible: relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 9 (5), 346–356. Day, M., Lichtenstein, S., 2007. Strategic supply management: the relationship between supply management practices, strategic orientation and their impact on organisational performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 12, 313–321. De Toni, A., Nassimbeni, G., 1999. Buyer–supplier operational practices, sourcing policies and plant performances: results of an empirical research. International Journal of Production Research 37 (3), 597–619. Dubois, A., Araujo, L., 2006. The relationship between technical and organizational interfaces in product development. The IMP Journal 1 (1), 21–38. Dubois, A., Araujo, L., 2007. Case research in purchasing and supply management. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 13, 170–181. Dubois, A., Gadde, L-E., 2002. Systematic combining—an abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research 55 (7), 553–560. ˚ Dubois, A., Hakansson, H., 2002. Conceptualising business relationships. Journal of Customer Behaviour 1, 49–68. Dyer, J., Nobeoka, K., 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledgesharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21, 345–367. Easton, G., Araujo, L., 1994. Market exchange, social structures and time. European Journal of Marketing 28 (3), 72–84. Ellram, L., Carr, A., 1994. Strategic purchasing: a history and review of the literature. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management (Spring), 10–18. ˚ Ford, D., Hakansson, H., Gadde, L-E., Snehota, I., 2003. Managing Business Relationships. John Wiley, Chichester. Fredriksson, P., 2006. Mechanisms and rationales for the coordination of a modular assembly system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 26 (4), 350–370. ˚ Gadde, L-E., Hakansson, H., 1993. Professional Purchasing. Routledge, London. Gadde, L.-E., Snehota, I., 2000. Making the most of supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management 29, 305–316. Ghoshal, S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1), 75–91. Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3), 481–510. Granovetter, M., 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In: Nohria, N., Eccles, R.G. (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, pp. 25–56. ˚ Hakansson, H., Snehota, I., 1995. Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Routledge, London. Havila, V., Johanson, J., Thilenius, P., 2004. International business-relationship triads. International Marketing Review 21 (2), 172–186. Helper, S.R., 1991. How much has really changed between US automakers and their suppliers? Sloan Management Review 32 (4), 15–28. Hines, P., 1995. Network sourcing: a hybrid approach. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 31 (2), 17–24. Hines, P., 1996. Network sourcing: a discussion of causality within the buyer–supplier relationship. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 2 (1), 7–20. Holmen, E., Pedersen, A-C., 2003. Strategizing through analyzing and inﬂuencing the network horizon. Industrial Marketing Management 32 (5), 409–418. ˚ Jahre, M., Gadde, L-E., Hakansson, H., Harrison, D., Persson, G., 2006. Resourcing in Business Logistics—the Art of Systematic Combining. Liber and Copenhagen ¨ Business School Press, Malmo. ¨ ¨ Kemppainen, K., Vepsalainen, A., 2003. Trends in industrial supply chains and networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 33 (8), 701–719. Kraljic, P., 1983. Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review (September–October), 109–117.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Dubois, P. Fredriksson / Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 14 (2008) 170–179 179
Laage-Hellman, J., 1989. Technological development in industrial networks. Ph.D. Dissertation, Uppsala University. Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J., Harland, C., 2000. An initial classiﬁcation of supply networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (6), 675–691. Meredith, J., 1998. Building operations management theory through case and ﬁeld research. Journal of Operations Management 16 (4), 441–454. Ragin, C.C., Becker, H.S., 1992. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Richardson, G.B., 1972. The organisation of industry. The Economic Journal 82 (327), 883–896. Richardson, J., 1993. Parallel sourcing and supplier performance in the Japanese automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal 14, 339–350. Richardson, J., Roumasset, J., 1995. Sole sourcing, competitive sourcing, parallel sourcing: mechanisms for supplier performance. Managerial and Decision Economics 16 (1), 71–84. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T., 1996. Modularity, ﬂexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 63–76. Sarkar, A., Mohapatra, P., 2006. Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: a method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 12, 148–163. Svensson, G., 2002. A triadic network approach to service quality. Journal of Services Marketing 16 (2), 158–179. Svensson, G., 2004. Triadic dependencies in business networks. European Business Review 16 (5), 473–493. Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York. Van Hoek, R., Weken, H., 1998. How modular production can contribute to integration in inbound and outbound logistics. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 1 (1), 39–56.
Van Weele, A.J., 2005. Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Thomson Learning, London. Ventovuori, T., 2006. Elements of sourcing strategies in FM services—a multiple case study. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10, 249–267. von Corswant, F., Fredriksson, P., 2002. Sourcing trends in the car industry— a survey of car manufacturers’ and suppliers’ strategies and relations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (7), 741–758. Wu, Z., Choi, T.Y., 2005. Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: building theories from eight case studies. Journal of Operations Management 24, 27–52. Yin, R.K., 2003. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Zeng, A., 2000. A synthetic study of sourcing strategies. Industrial Management and Data Systems 1000 (5), 219–226. Zirpoli, F., Caputo, M., 2002. The nature of buyer–supplier relationships in codesign activities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (12), 1389–1410.
Anna Dubois is Professor at the division of Industrial Marketing, Chalmers University of Technology. Her research interests are focused on supply chain management with an emphasis on industrial purchasing.
Peter Fredriksson is Assistant Professor at the division of Industrial Marketing, Chalmers University of Technology. His research and teaching concern supply chain management and product modularity.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document