Topics: Electronic health record, Health care, Medicine Pages: 66 (13812 words) Published: February 24, 2014

Information technology
in health care



Information technology
in health care


In this chapter


nformation technology (IT) has the potential to improve the

What is health information

Quality and health
information technology

Current status of health
information technology

Efforts to encourage faster

quality, safety, and efficiency of health care. Diffusion of IT in health care is generally low (varying, however, with the application and setting) but surveys indicate that providers plan to

increase their investments. Drivers of investment in IT include the promise of quality and efficiency gains. Barriers include the cost and complexity of IT implementation, which often necessitates significant work process and cultural changes. Certain characteristics of the health

care market—including payment policies that reward volume rather than quality, and a fragmented delivery system—can also pose barriers to IT adoption. Given IT’s potential, both the private and public sectors have engaged in numerous efforts to promote its use within and across health care settings. Additional steps could include financial incentives (e.g., payment policy or loans) and expanded efforts to standardize records formats, nomenclature, and communication protocols to enhance interoperability. However, any policy to stimulate further investment must be carefully considered because of the possibility of unintended consequences.

Report to the Congress: New Approaches in Medicare | June 2004


By providing new ways for providers and their patients to
readily access and use health information, information
technology (IT) has the potential to improve the quality,
safety, and efficiency of health care. However, relatively
few health care providers have fully adopted IT. Low
diffusion is due partly to the complexity of IT investment,
which goes beyond acquiring technology to changing
work processes and cultures, and ensuring that physicians,
nurses, and other staff use it. In addition, certain aspects of the market—such as payment policies that reward volume
rather than quality and the fragmentation of care
delivery—do not promote IT investment, and may hinder
it. Because of its potential, policymakers need to better
understand how information technology is diffusing across
providers, whether action to spur further adoption is
needed, and if so, what steps might be taken. Any policy
to stimulate further investment must be carefully
considered because of possible unintended
consequences—such as implementation failures due to
organizations’ inability to make the necessary cultural
changes. This chapter is a first step in increasing our
understanding of the current state of IT in the health care
industry. The Commission will continue to work on this
Despite considerable attention to the topic, much remains
unknown about the role of IT in the health care setting.
What types of IT are being used? What is the link between
use of IT and quality improvements? How much
investment have hospitals and physicians already made in
information technology, and in what kinds? What factors
drive IT investments (e.g., financial returns, quality
improvement goals, other factors)? What factors hinder IT
investments and implementation (e.g., work flow changes,
lack of compatibility with other IT, costs)? What current
steps are being taken by public and private entities to
encourage further diffusion of IT? What additional actions
might make sense?
Delivering quality health care requires providers and
patients to integrate complex information from many
different sources. Thus, increasing the ability of
physicians, nurses, clinical technicians, and others to
readily access and use the right information about their
patients should improve care. The ability for patients to
obtain information to better...

References: Abt Associates, Inc. 2004a. Summary of findings from the second
round of MedPAC hospital IT investment interviews
Abt Associates, Inc. 2004b. Summary of findings from the first
round of MedPAC hospital IT investment interviews
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2001. Making
health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices.
Center for Information Technology Leadership. 2003. The value
of computerized provider order entry in ambulatory settings.
Chin, T. 2004. Financing high-tech: You can afford it after all.
AHA News Now. 2004. UK health service IT chief predicts
shakeout among health care IT providers AHA News Now
Darves, B. 2004. CPOE: The promise and the pitfalls.
Armstrong, D. 2003. Study finds increase in medication errors at
De La Garza, P. 2004. VA vows to retrain Bay Pines staffers. St.
Bates, D. W., and A. A. Gawande. 2003. Improving safety with
information technology
Devers, K. J., and G. Liu. 2004. Leapfrog patient-safety
standards are a stretch for most hospitals
Bates, D. W., L. L. Leape, D. J. Cullen, et al. 1998. Effect of
computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on
Dodge, J. 2004. Exclusive: A conversation at HIMSS with
Richard Granger
Baldwin, F. D. 2002. Healthcare PACS for the future. Healthcare
Informatics (November): 38–43
Brailer, D. J. 2004. Policy options for improving health care
efficiency and quality through adoption of interoperable
First Consulting Group. 2003. Computerized physician order
entry: Costs, benefits and challenges, a case study approach.
Food and Drug Administration. 2004. Bar code label
requirements for human drug products and biological products.
Brailer, D. J., and E. L. Terasawa. 2003. Use and adoption of
computer-based patient records in the United States: A review
Brailer, D. J., N. Augustinos, L. Evans, et al. 2003. Moving
toward electronic health information exchange: Interim report on
Broder, C. 2004. Health information exchange projects
underscore challenges, successes
Center for Information Technology Leadership. 2004. New
findings show that investment in standardized healthcare
Freudenheim, M., 2004. Many hospitals resist computerized
patient care
General Accounting Office. 2003. Information technology:
Benefits realized for selected health care functions
Givens, R. 2003. Clinical transformation: Cross-industry lessons
for health care
Glaser, J. P. 2002. The strategic application of information
technology in health care organizations
Hawryluk, M. 2004. FDA targets medication errors by requiring
bar codes on drugs
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. 2003. Report to the
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Censoring Student Publications Persuasive Essay
  • Publications Essay
  • Censorship on Campus Publications Essay
  • Research Trends in the Academy of Management Publications Essay
  • Defamation Is the Publication of a Statement Essay
  • Chapter 14 Accounting Publications And Essay
  • Essay about family survey publication

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free