Preview

Public Diplomacy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public Diplomacy
Fermin, Lyca B. Prof. Lilia GC. Casanova
AB Foreign Service / 3rd year Public Diplomacy

Homework #1 1. Cite a country that gives preference to the use of hard power over the use of soft power as their public diplomacy. In your opinion, is that country effective in using hard power? Give an example and states your reason why.

A country that gives preference to the use of hard power instead of soft power in relation to their Public diplomacy is China. China is evidently one of the most powerful and developed countries in the world. As the result of its participation in world trade and its consequent growing demand for overseas energy and raw materials, the South China Sea has become an increasingly important resource for Beijing. China claims many Islands across Asia. And one of these is the Spratley Islands (which is rich in oil, natural gases and coral reefs) and claiming it as their own. They even sent many warships on the disputed sea and vehemently enforcing law against the Filipino immigrants.

In my opinion, China’s use of hard power in their public diplomacy is effective. Because they consequently take stand for what they believed for as they were the owner of the disputed island. They strongly stand and never give up its claim. And also; they have strong military power that they can use against the defender countries. Though we have a strong stand, we all know that we can never challenge the military capabilities of China against our military power for it is broad, skilled and well funded investment into armed forces agencies.

2. Cite a country that gives preference to the use of soft power over the use of hard power as their public diplomacy. In your opinion, is that country effective in using soft power? Give an example and states your reason why.
A country that gives preference to the use of soft power over the use of hard power as their public diplomacy is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6. Big Stick Diplomacy - International negotiations backed by the threat of force. The phrase comes from a proverb quoted by Theodore Roosevelt, who said that the United States should “ Speak softly and carry a big stick.”…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Assignment 1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. One of the most important concepts in government and politics is the concept of legitimacy. It is generally agreed that if a government lacks legitimacy, it cannot govern. a. What is legitimacy? What role does it serve in governance? Illustrate your response with examples. b. When comparing democratic governments with dictatorships, we find that dictators generally have greater difficulty establishing legitimacy than democratic leaders. Why is this the case? Illustrate your response with examples. c. It is often noted that in winning the year 2000 presidential race, George Bush’s victory provided him with a weak case for legitimacy. Why? (If you don’t know this answer off the top of your head, do a quick Google search on the controversies associated with the election.) d. How did the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon greatly strengthen George Bush’s claims for legitimacy?…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ: 1

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. To what extent was the early United States foreign policy a primarily defensive reaction to actual or perceived threats from Europe? Evaluate with regard to United States foreign policy on TWO major issues during the period from 1789 – 1815.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    mpo essay 1

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Remember also that your assignment must demonstrate critical thinking, as I have emphasised in each lecture. Question assumptions by considering the negative aspects of post-bureaucratic soft power. Is it desirable in all circumstances? Are there ethical considerations? What about concerns with subtle manipulation and control? You need to grapple with the complexity of the issues – not merely give a one-sided managerialist argument.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steve

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Argue that the Obama administration’s strategy did a better job of accommodating the political realities that result from fragmented political institutions. 4. Give examples to support and clarify this argument.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Discuss the diplomatic history of the U.S. with these countries and create a PowerPoint presentation that:…

    • 906 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics (Palmar, 2010; Lagon, 2011) dislike Barak Obama’s policy decisions. They argue that Obama mostly was using hard power politics. Their arguments include: 1) increased amount of US troops in Afghanistan by 35000 soldiers, 2) unmanned drones used against terrorists, 3) failure to close Guantánamo, and 4) killing Osama bin Laden. For this reason, critics point out that even if Obama speaks in the language of soft power, his actions are of hard power (Hallams, 2011). As a counterargument to this statement, it is worth analyzing President’s speech at Oslo in 2009, where Obama mentioned that soft power and diplomacy are crucially important but not everything may be solved or achieved through them. So here are the limits of soft power.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. In a world that seems to prize action and reaction, explain the power of using peace to respond to action.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US approached diplomacy through the cultural urban music in the US to the world like Jazz, R&B , to folk and classical music and even rock and roll music. This was considered a pivotal aspect of American cold war diplomacy. The political term for this is the usage of Soft Power. Soft power is defined by getting the outcome that you want using persuasion rather than coercion, in contrast to hard power. Another aspect of American soft power is not only the use of media, but also via goods and products like coca cola or Denim.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rational Appeasement

    • 15284 Words
    • 62 Pages

    Keltner, Dacher, Randall Young, and B+ N+ Buswell+ 1997+ Appeasement in Human Emotion, Social Practice, and Personality+ Aggressive Behavior 23 ~5!:359–74+ Kennedy, Paul+ 1981+ The Realities Behind Diplomacy: Background Influences on British External Policy, 1865–1980+ London: Allen & Unwin+ ———+ 1982+ Appeasement+ History Today 32 ~10!:51–53+ ———+ 1983+ The Tradition of Appeasement in British Foreign Policy, 1865–1939+ In Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870–1945: Eight Studies, edited by Paul Kennedy, 13–39+ London: Allen & Unwin+ ———+ 1987+ The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000+ New York: Random House+ Kreps, David, and Robert Wilson+ 1982+ Reputation and Imperfect Information+ Journal of Economic Theory 27 ~2!:253–79+ Lebow, Richard Ned, and Janice Gross Stein+ 1989+ Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter+ World Politics 41 ~2!:208–24+ Lobell, Steven+ 2001+ Britain’s Paradox: Cooperation or Punishment Prior to World War I+ Review of International Studies 27 ~2!:169–86+ Machiavelli, Niccolò+ 1984+ The Discourses+ Edited by Bernard Crick+ Translated by Leslie Walker+ New York: Viking+ Mercer, Jonathan+ 1996+ Reputation and International Politics+ Ithaca, N+Y+: Cornell University Press+ Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts+ 1982+ Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence+ Journal of Economic Theory 27 ~2!:280–312+ Parker, Geoffrey+ 1979+ Spain and the Netherlands, 1559–1659: Ten Studies+ London: Collins+ Powell, Robert+ 1996+ Uncertainty, Shifting Power, and Appeasement+ American Political Science Review 90 ~4!:749– 64+ Rock, Stephen+ 2000+ Appeasement in International Politics+ Lexington: University Press of Kentucky+ Sartori, Anne+ 2002+ The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes+ International Organization 56 ~1!…

    • 15284 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What are American foreign policy terms? Give an example of one use of hard power and one use of soft power in promoting each goal?…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why the Cold War Ended

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kolko, Gabriel, and Joyce Kolko 1972. The Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945–1954. New York, Relevant revisionist volume on the Cold War.pp 89-90…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Syria Current Event

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. How might a change in power alter the balance of power in the Middle East? Do you think those changes are more likely to be a benefit or detriment to the U.S.?…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Power has always been central theme of International Relations. States interact on the basis of relative national power to safeguard national interests. In this anarchic world definition and quantification of National power has been an area of interest of theorists like Nicolo Machiavelli, David Hume, E.H Carr and Hans J. Morgentheu.[1] National power was divided in to elements of Geography, Demography, Natural resources, Industrial Capacity (Tech), Military preparedness, National Character and Morale.[2] These elements were also classified as tangible and intangible in an effort to quantity them.[3] The nature of power is complex and ever changing.[4] It is never stagnant and thus needs to be studied and evaluated to foresee future events and conflicts. During the last few decades communication revolution has emerged as a crucial source of national power. Like other elements of power, communication work in coordination with others and increase the net ability of national power of a state manifold. Information and communication are two ends of the same coin. However, communication is the nucleus of modern advancements without which information is worthless. The ‘communication revolution’ terminology is also characterized as ‘Information and Communication revolution (ICR)’. The technical advances in the field of information sensors, computers, satellite communication systems, TV channels and internet have changed the social, political, economic and military dynamics of the world affairs. Two major phenomena have occurred. One is of ‘globalization’ encompassing social, political and economic aspects of communication revolution and other is of changing dynamics of modern warfare generally termed as ‘Revolution in Military Affairs’. These revolutionary changes have also affected political thought and Grand strategy mechanism. The hard power concept was added with ‘soft power’ concept.…

    • 3897 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays