Psychological Effects of Social Media
The Daily Mail just ran a thought-provoking article about the effect that social websites have on childhood development. In short, eminent neuroscientist Susan Greenfield claims that social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter shorten attention spans and contribute to an instant gratification, self-centered mindset.
From the article:
We know how small babies need constant reassurance that they exist. My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment.
I often wonder whether real conversation in real time may eventually give way to these sanitised and easier screen dialogues, in much the same way as killing, skinning and butchering an animal to eat has been replaced by the convenience of packages of meat on the supermarket shelf.
Let me first say that I am not a scientist, a psychologist or even a social networking guru; but I am a father and a member of the human race, so addressing these concerns—whether real or imagined—is significant to me.
To be completely fair, I don’t think the fault rests solely on social networking; it’s symptomatic of a larger concern. Instant communication technologies like IRC, IM and texting are low-resolution communication “proxies”. Instead of learning how to interact directly with human beings, we learn how to interact through these proxies.
The big difference between relating to humans and relating to humans through a proxy, I believe, is how we learn to deal with disparity. With these proxies in place, it’s so easy to sever the connection with little consequence because it’s just a machine; the proxy keeps us from considering the human being on the other side of the connection. Real life human interaction makes it much harder to just “ignore” someone we don’t like or don’t agree with.
The other concern that seems especially relevant for children is that if they learn
From the article:
We know how small babies need constant reassurance that they exist. My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment.
I often wonder whether real conversation in real time may eventually give way to these sanitised and easier screen dialogues, in much the same way as killing, skinning and butchering an animal to eat has been replaced by the convenience of packages of meat on the supermarket shelf.
Let me first say that I am not a scientist, a psychologist or even a social networking guru; but I am a father and a member of the human race, so addressing these concerns—whether real or imagined—is significant to me.
To be completely fair, I don’t think the fault rests solely on social networking; it’s symptomatic of a larger concern. Instant communication technologies like IRC, IM and texting are low-resolution communication “proxies”. Instead of learning how to interact directly with human beings, we learn how to interact through these proxies.
The big difference between relating to humans and relating to humans through a proxy, I believe, is how we learn to deal with disparity. With these proxies in place, it’s so easy to sever the connection with little consequence because it’s just a machine; the proxy keeps us from considering the human being on the other side of the connection. Real life human interaction makes it much harder to just “ignore” someone we don’t like or don’t agree with.
The other concern that seems especially relevant for children is that if they learn