Preview

Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment
The second amendment states that all citizens have the right to bear arms, the first draft of this amendment, from James Madison, Federalist Papers No. 46. James Madison states that; “ A regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.” .He also states , “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” What James Madison is basically saying is that citizens should have the right …show more content…
City of Chicago, (2010), Chicago resident Otis McDonald, a 76 year old retired maintenance engineer, had lived in the Morgan Park neighborhood since buying a house there in 1971. McDonald decried the decline of his neighborhood, describing it as being taken over by gangs and drug dealers. His lawn was regularly littered with refuse and his home and garage had been broken into a combined five times, with the most recent robbery committed by a man McDonald recognized from his own neighborhood. An experienced hunter, McDonald legally owned shotguns, but believed them too unwieldy in the event of a robbery, and wanted to purchase a handgun for personal home defense. Due to Chicago's requirement that all firearms in the city be registered, yet refusing all handgun registrations after 1982 when a citywide handgun ban was passed, he was unable to legally own a handgun. As a result, in 2008, he joined three other Chicago residents in filing a lawsuit which became McDonald v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution was created on September17th in 1817. The constitution has only been amended only 17 times since its creation. A constitution amendment can be proposed by a majority vote in The House of Representatives and The Senate. This process begins when a member of congress introduces a bill to amend the constitution. The proposal is debated and pondered on by the different committees. Public hearings are help so that the public can express their opinions and concerns. If the proposal is approved by the house and senate committees’ it will be brought for a vote. The final product must be identical in both houses and must receive a two-thirds of the majority vote in order to pass.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, especially after the Connecticut shooting, there is an argument over the right to bear arms. One portion of the argument focuses on whether or not people even have this right. As stated by Michael Sommers, the second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Sommers 42) When the second amendment was written and passed, there was no professional army, only a civilian…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case began when Dick Heller, a special police officer, was not permitted to register to use a handgun i his home on the basis of the District of Columbia’s Firearms Regulation Act of 1975 (NOLO). Heller then claimed this violated his Second Amendment Rights, and the case reached the Supreme Court (NOLO). Heller effectively won the case, and the right to carry a handgun. Now, we will examine why Heller won the case. For one, the law would not allow anyone to register handguns without permission from the police chief.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To better understand why the language of the 2nd amendment was used in such a way at to regarding arming individuals and maintaining militias, it’s necessary to understand the history of the people who wrote it. A foundation of political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. The right to bear arms was a potential check against tyranny. According to Sandra Alters in her book Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People, “without guns in the hands of the early patriots, the fledgling republic might have quickly turned tyrannical, disarmed the people at…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 2nd Amendment in the United States Constitution written in 1971 states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Many gun control proponents believe that it means the military and law enforcement agencies should be the only ones to own guns. As I read it, it clearly says, "The people to keep and bear arms" meaning…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is quite telling that one of the first conditions the founders made a point of spelling out in the document, was the right of the individual to bear arms. The second amendment does not stipulate the types or numbers of firearms. It can be assumed that was because at the time of the framing of the Constitution, there were not many different types of firearms in existance. But it does have some fail-safes in place to allow the government the ability to place limits on the manufacture, ownership, and sale of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had to decide whether or not to allow all citizens the right to bear arms or if there should be requirements. They came to the conclusions that, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment has been interpreted in many different ways in the past however, the Framers intention was to have the members of the militia ready at a minutes notice to go and protect the freedom and liberty of the country. However, just like today, there was controversy over what the Second Amendment was suppose to mean to the country. James Madison argued in the Federalist paper 28 that everyone should have the right to bear arms when he wrote, “ Little more can reasonably be aimed at with the respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed and equipped ; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control vs. Gun Rights

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From reading the Stencel book, I have learned for the first time that the Second Amendment was not just the right to bear arms. The Stencel book tells us that the Second Amendment really states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to…

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Debate

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Second Amendment text states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (Jefferson)” The argument over the second amendment is basic and complex at the same time. Most of the controversy is over the vagueness of the terms…

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “discussions about citizens’ rights to bear arms extend back to ancient times. Political theorists from Cicero of ancient Rome to John Locke (1632–1704) of England and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) of France viewed the possession of arms as a symbol of personal freedom and an indispensable element of popular government” (“Gun Control”). As you can see, the concept of personal protection is by no means a new one. Due to America’s bitter fight for freedom from Great Britain’s tyrannical empire, the founding fathers firmly believed it was within the citizen’s unalienable rights to bear arms. Not only was this idea reinforced by the need to protect oneself from would be attackers, but also the government itself if ever need be. In order to solidify this right to the people the second amendment was ratified as a hard copy defense for American citizens to legally bear arms. As it clearly states in the bill of rights, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    the second amendment

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights was adopted on December 15, 1791. The Second Amendment gives and protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms from infraction. The Amendment officially states, “A well regulated militia being necessary of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shell not be infringed”. Meaning that in order for the nation to be safe men must be able to keep and bear firearms. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Second Amendment was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. This right was described by Sir William Blackstone as an “assistant right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense, resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state.” Stuart Hays explains the amendment in other words by saying, “ it is with the defense and revolutionary forces that the Second Amendment concerns itself. As a part of the revolutionary force, weapons are an element of the control of men’s destiny. In the…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From its passage and until the late 20th century, the 2nd Amendment to the constitution was interpreted to protect the rights of states to maintain militias and for militiamen to sustain arsenals. In the early years of our country, there was no standing federal army (the founders were afraid of a national standing army consolidating power) and the states were expected to sustain a state militia in order to contribute to the national defense; this expectation necessitated protections for militias that would facilitate militiamen keeping weapons for their service.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays