Preview

Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College
Ever since the constitution has been written, the president of the united states has been elected via the electoral college. Despite its long-time usage, the electoral college has many critics. Various people, wish for the president to be elected via a popular vote. While others, continue to be happy with usage of the electoral college. Others, simply are confused by the process of the electoral college all together. This leads to many political scientists to question if the electoral college is in fact effective, or if a popular vote would be better. However, both the popular vote and the electoral college have pros and cons. The pros for the electoral college is that is has been used for years. The basis of the electoral college is written down in the constitution. As long as the United States uses the electoral college as the way to vote in a president there will be no need for a constitutional amendment. It could be years before congress could effectively write and pass an amendment that could …show more content…
Using the popular vote as the way to elect the president has one main pro. The pro of the popular vote form of voting is the president will have to win the popular vote to be elected into office. Another pro, is that everyone’s vote in a state will count. With the electoral college if you vote for the losing candidate in your state, your vote will not matter in a sense. However, with the popular vote that is not a problem, a person’s vote will matter. The popular vote form of voting is also much simpler and easier to explain to people compared to the electoral college. However, with the popular vote candidates will most likely flock to high populated areas, to gain more peoples’ votes. A candidate may be more likely to ignore less populated areas if they were elected by a popular vote system, which is con that comes along with electing the president via popular vote. Another con with the popular

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College was established in 1787 as a compromise between having Congress select the next President of the United States, and having a direct democracy in which the popular vote selected the next President. The system has worked for over 200 years, so why change it now?…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason is because it allows for the possibility that one candidate would win the majority of the popular vote across the nation, and still be able to lose the election if another candidate wins the electoral vote. This has happened on more than one occasion, most recently in 2000 when George W. Bush won the electoral vote and became President despite the fact that his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. The world was shocked when Bush was named winner of the U.S. presidential election, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials based on majority rule? The U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage. The result in 2000 election led many people to call for Electoral College reform or a change to a direct popular vote system. No major changes have yet been made to the system; the electoral college remains the “democratic” way we elect the President of the United…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if I were to tell you that something in the constitution was actually unconstitutional? The Electoral College is, and there are many more reasons it is a flawed system of electing our president. As it stands today, electoral votes only matter in a few states and some states do not matter in the grand scheme of things. Besides that, we have recently had a president elected who did not win the popular vote. This president has made a number of controversial decisions, and many call for him to be impeached for a large variety of reasons.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument most used against the Electoral College is that there is a possibility for a candidate to win the popular vote and still lose the election. This has happened four times since the Electoral College went into effect. The most recent time this had happened was in the elections of 2000. Historian Rick Shenkman from George Mason University states that “there has been no aspect of what the founders worked up in Philadelphia that has received more criticism than the Electoral College.” (Dotinga, 2008) Ever since the Electoral College went into effect there have been more than 700 attempts to either abolish it completely or to drastically ratify it (Uhlmann,…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would be for the Electoral College because some people abide by the saying “if it isn’t broke don’t fix it”. Keeping the electoral college would keep the framers hard work going. The framers wanted the electoral college because they feared direct democracy and also didn't trust the population to make the right decision. Lastly, the framers really wanted to support the rural areas and small states to make sure they can have say so while electing their president. The electoral college is also mainly built for equality of power. The people have…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College is an old and complicated system set up by the Founding Fathers to elect the Executive branch. It was created in order to put a layer in the system of electing president as they did not fully trust democracy. As a result, the outcome of the president election is not determined by simply adding the national vote of each of the candidates. Each state is allocated a number of ECVs, one for each senator and one for each congressman. For example California would receive 55 ECVs due to the fact that they have 53 reps and 2 senators. Whichever candidate wins a majority of votes in a state, wins all of the states ECVs.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous negative points to having the Electoral College. The Electoral College weighs the votes from smaller states more than larger ones because each state's electoral votes are equivalent to the number of House and Senate seats it has, thus giving one of those smaller state’s votes the power to really make a difference. Secondly, the Electoral College only acknowledges majority votes of the states and ignore the minority votes. Those who do not agree with everyone else are not represented at all.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College should not be abolished, because if it is then the election process would collapse. The Electoral College was created because “normal citizens” were not deemed worth of voting because they would not know what or who they were voting for. The system is built in a way that is complicated, but it works, here is how it works: all US states and DC get one electoral vote for each of their US Senators and Representatives. The Representatives’ votes are determined by the decennial census, and the US Senators have 2 per state. There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and all the candidate needs to get to win is 270 votes. This is a system that has been around since the Constitutional Convention, so why is there any reason to change it. The reason that it has been around for so long is because the Electoral College was made so that the two major political parties would have an advantage against the minority or third parties. They did this because the third parties focus too much on one issue and that would be disastrous for our government. But third parties do deserve to still be in the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Electoral College is an integral part of America’s political system. In 1787, the delegates of the Constitutional Convention decided on the creation of the Electoral College, or a system under which a body is elected with the expressed purpose of itself electing a higher body. The College was established by Article Two, Section One of the United States Constitution. (Lesson 2: Political Participation, n.d.) The Founding Fathers wished to provide the people of each state the ability every four years to choose the number of electors who would vote in the Electoral College, who would in turn determine which candidate would enter the White House as the nation’s next president. (Watts, 2010) For the past 200 years, the Electoral…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays