Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional
…show more content…
In a perfect world, this would lead to effective representation for each state. Normally a bicameral congress issues an abundant say to both houses in deciding laws. Furthermore, the founders vied for this in efforts to smother and hinder any sort of dictatorships on U.S. soil.” Larger states wanted representation purely by population. Smaller states did not appreciate that method, because they felt it lessened their say. They would have minimal say in national government, and fewer representatives. A compromise was eventually agreed on every state would have two representatives in the Senate and have representatives based on population (the house).
The senate and congress each gained power. The “upper house” is the senate, and it is made up of two senators from each individual state. There are obligated to be at least thirty years old, a citizen of the United States for nine years, and usually serve up to six years. The way the house is conducted is that there are representatives based on how big the state is and its population. Representatives must be at least twenty five years of age and had to be a citizen for at least seven years. The United States constitution is enforced in a sense, because this system implements checks and
In a perfect world, this would lead to effective representation for each state. Normally a bicameral congress issues an abundant say to both houses in deciding laws. Furthermore, the founders vied for this in efforts to smother and hinder any sort of dictatorships on U.S. soil.” Larger states wanted representation purely by population. Smaller states did not appreciate that method, because they felt it lessened their say. They would have minimal say in national government, and fewer representatives. A compromise was eventually agreed on every state would have two representatives in the Senate and have representatives based on population (the house).
The senate and congress each gained power. The “upper house” is the senate, and it is made up of two senators from each individual state. There are obligated to be at least thirty years old, a citizen of the United States for nine years, and usually serve up to six years. The way the house is conducted is that there are representatives based on how big the state is and its population. Representatives must be at least twenty five years of age and had to be a citizen for at least seven years. The United States constitution is enforced in a sense, because this system implements checks and