The infamous George Zimmerman case has stirred the controversy around Stand Your Ground laws and brought these laws to the public light, becoming the subject of vigorous nationwide debates whether these laws should be repealed or not. Like many controversial legislative, Stand Your Ground laws have their critics and proponents, and both sides tend to make valid points in defense of their position. The goal of this paper is to show cons and pros of Stand Your Ground laws.
In Florida as well as 21 other American states, as stated by to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the above-mentioned laws are self-defense laws that relieve individuals of their “duty to retreat from an attacker before using force against them anywhere they are legally allowed to be” (Clark). While in general these laws do not use such a notion as “stand your ground” specifically, Florida together with nine other states has these words in its law. In Stand Your Ground law in Florida, particularly, it is stated that “a person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony” (qtd. in Clark).
The major con of this law, as its critics think, is that it essentially gives individuals with malicious intent a legal loophole to avoid criminal prosecution for killing someone if these individual state that they had to defend themselves. Eric Holder, the US Attorney General, is among those opponents of Stand Your Ground laws who believe that these laws will allow individuals to provoke others to attack them first and then, as it can be deemed self-defense and these individuals will not have the duty to retreat, they will be able to kill them without fear of getting prosecuted (Cooke). In states with Stand Your Ground laws, people will not have to think twice whether they should use weapons to defend themselves against the attackers or retreat because they will have the right to kill their attackers. Such violence will breed further violence. Criminals may use this law to cover up the deliberate and premeditated killing of people.
However, proponents of this law may respond to the above-mentioned claims of their counterparts as follows. This critique of Stand Your Ground crumbles under the weight of the argument that “In almost every state, if and when an individual enters into an altercation with the deliberate intention of provoking the other party into threatening him with death or injury, they lose the right to claim that they were acting in self-defense” (Cooke). All individuals have the right to liberty and life and therefore, they have the right to defend themselves. Those who attack people violate their victims’ rights to live, so Stand Your Ground laws legally recognize these rights, attempting to “tilt the balance in favor of the attacked” (Cooke).
Both, the opponents and proponents of Stand Your Ground laws have reasonable and sound arguments, but they need to find some middle ground regarding these laws that will satisfy both sides.
Works Cited
Clark, Korey. Nearly Half of States Have "Stand Your Ground" Laws like Florida 's. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013. http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/criminal/b/criminal-law-blog/archive/2013/07/24/nearly-half-of-states-have-quot-stand-your-ground-quot-laws-like-florida-39-s.aspx.
Cooke, Charles C.W. Stand Your Ground on Stand Your Ground. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013 .
Cited: Clark, Korey. Nearly Half of States Have "Stand Your Ground" Laws like Florida 's. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013. http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/criminal/b/criminal-law-blog/archive/2013/07/24/nearly-half-of-states-have-quot-stand-your-ground-quot-laws-like-florida-39-s.aspx. Cooke, Charles C.W. Stand Your Ground on Stand Your Ground. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013 .
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind said by famous peacemaker Mahatma Gandhi. This law has caused people to kill first instead of trying to avoid conflict. If we don’t change the logistics of this law then we won’t know which side of the law that we stand on. The law is supposed to solve problems, not create them. Laws should provide as much clarity as possible, not expand racism and discrimination. Laws should always bring about the practical results their promoters claim they’ll achieve. This law should help to bring us together as nation not tear us apart. This law should be abolished and buried.…
- 1178 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Michael Brown was an 18 year old African American teenager, who was fatally shot by Darren Wilson a white ferguson police officer. Darren wasn’t charged because of the Stand Your Ground law. A Stand Your Ground law is a law that authorizes a person to protect and defend one’s life and limb against threat or perceived threat. This law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place he or she has a lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if he or she reasonably believes he or she faces an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Although some people may believe that the stand your ground law is just and fair,Many people could take advantage of the law by causing unnecessary harm to people, There for the Stand Your Ground law should be abolished.…
- 1726 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In Tennessee v. Garner (1985), the court held that a police officer, when pursuing a fleeing suspect, may use deadly force only to prevent escape if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. (Peak, (2015). John Blume wrote an article titled…
- 793 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This paper will discuss the stand your ground laws and also the castle doctrine. These laws play a big role in today’s society and also, at times create a blurry line in terms of self defense. This can be seen in the case of Trayvon martin and George Zimmerman. This was when an unarmed black teen by the name of Trayvon Martin, was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, the unofficial neighborhood watch man. Zimmerman stated that the death occurred due to self defense and that the case fell under the stand your ground law. The Jury’s verdict then acquitted Zimmerman of the charge of second degree murder. This high profile case caused much controversy and reawakened the question of what is self-defense and what is murder. Furthermore this paper will discuss whether or not these laws just and fair or are a license to kill.…
- 1142 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless the…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the stand your ground law is used to stop violence its use results in uneccessary deaths therefore O.C.G.A should be revised.the whole u.s was shocked when george zimmerman was founf innocent of killing 17 year old trayvon martin.it was thought of as a easy case for zimmerman since he had no strong opposing testimony.he also used the stand your ground law to prevent jail time.ever since this case there have been continous cases of the law where murderers get away therefore it needing to be revised.…
- 436 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One law I will forever remember is the “Stand Your Ground” law. This law has been around for some time now but many people including myself have only recently learned of this law, because of a very emotional case in Florida involving ,George Zimmerman” murdering a 17 year old unarmed boy named “Trayvon Martin.” Stand your ground law was actually passed October 1, 2005. Ironically Florida was the first state to pass (Stand your ground law) and now Florida is the state that is making this law a nationwide topic. This law is one that people will abuse, we have already seen proof and I am sure that minorities are against this law more so than Whites are.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The "Miranda rule," which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any child who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney" Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona remains the subject of often heated debate, and has had a great impact on law enforcement in the U.S.…
- 1557 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is holding another person down against their will. The reason it is considered defense of persons because Leroy was using reasonable force by protecting Jane the third person from injury where John threatened by an attacking force.…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I dissaree with the stand your ground law, becaues of the case of trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman says Trayvon Martin attacked him and shot him from self-defence( trayvon was an unarmed man). The Stand Your Ground Law states that if you are attacked or feel like your in danger, you had the right to kill that person.This is like saying if some one almost pushed me off the edge of a clif while running,i have the right to push them off that same clif leaving them dead. Although the stand your ground law help people defend them selves in life thretining situations, it gives a murderer a reason to kill innocent people.On the day trayvon martin died, he was on the phone with his girlfriend. she clames he saw a man following him and started to run. She also says he got away form a man,who turn out to be Zimmerman, but only temporaily Eventruly he stoped running, because he was close to the house he was staying in. when Zimmerman got closer to Trayvon, stated the girlfriend, Travon called out, "Why you following me for?" "I hear this man, like this old man, say, 'What are you doing around here?' " the girl said. The girl said she called out to Martin, asking what was happening, but he didn't answer. The next thing she heard was a bumping sound, followed by what might have been a scuffle. "I could hear it a little bit, 'Get off, get off,' then the phone just hung up," the girl said. This is some evidence that proves Zimmerman is guilty.…
- 732 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
¨ Ignorance of how we are shaped racially is the first sign of privilege in other words. It is a privilege to ignore the consequences of race in america ” ( wise) . This quote by Tim Wise explains what is happening today to our African American youth. They are dying everyday due to racism. The stand your ground law was created in 2005. This law is “so called” supposed to remove the duty to retreat before using force in self defense, but that's not what is happening today. This law is suppose to help people, but instead it's hurting African American youth. Although the stand your ground law may be regarded as a way to protect the community, it is being misused by police officers at the expense of African Americans; therefore the stand your ground should be altered to protect the young black African American community.…
- 1611 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
On February 26, 2012, the 17 year old Trayvon Martin was fatally shot by George Zimmerman in Sanford, Florida. After the shooting, Zimmerman wasn't arrested because of the "Stand Your Ground" laws. This sparked concerns and feelings during the trial and after. This paper will examine the "Stand Your Ground" laws in all aspects. Through this careful examination it will be revealed that the "Stand Your Ground" laws was relevant in the Zimmerman trial.…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A case in which the court ruled that a Tennessee “fleeing felon” law was unconstitutional because it legalize the use of deadly force by police when a suspect poses no immediate threat to the police or others. The court ruled that the use of deadly force was a Fourth Amendment seizure issue subject to a finding of “ reasonableness.”…
- 1827 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Thesis: The Federalist Papers influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution.…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
During the trial the defense moved to suppress the weapons, stating that you must have the probable cause that is required to place a person under arrest. The defense attorney goes on to ague that Officer McFadden did do the "smart" thing, but not a "Constitutional" thing. A "stop and frisk" is no less invasive than a warranted search, the court found that there interrogation was warranted and that the police officer had a right for his own protection to pat them down. By doing this the court distinguished between an "Investigatory Stop" and an arrest. The court also distinguished the difference between a "Frisk" of outer clothing…
- 986 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays