Pros And Cons Of Sex Offender Registry

This articles has the story of Daniel Ray Winfrey, who was 15 at the time, and his friends raped and murdered Julie and Robin Kerry. He spent 30 years in prison and has been paroled twice after his conviction. Sometimes he feels free but not completely free because his name is still on the sex offender registry. On the other hand, there is Ali Nemec’s fiance, who was arrested at the age of 17 for having child pornography on his computer. Now he is 24 and remains on the list. He finds it very difficult to find employment. Even after sex offenders serve their time in prison, they cannot fully integrate back into the community because their name is on the registry. In the state of Missouri, their names and faces will be on the websites for the rest of their lives, including juveniles. Some say registries are effective because the public needs to know their whereabouts after they serve their time to prevent re-offenses. Others believe they should be given a second chance to become productive citizens. “Critics claim that the registry nets are cast so widely they often catch people who most would agree aren’t sexual threats. One commonly cited example are the so-called “Romeo and Juliet” offenders, who had consensual sex with teenage lovers, sometimes when they themselves were teenagers”(McDermott 22). They say these are foolish mistakes and deserve a second opportunity.
One of them raped and murdered two sisters, while the second guy have a criminal past for having child pornography on his computer. Although the offenses are very different, both men are currently paying the same consequences. They are both registered sex offenders who are never going to be able to fully integrate into the community. I would be able to use this to show that it is unfair to register every convicted sex offender regardless of the severity of the