Preview

Pros And Cons Of Selling Human Organs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
991 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Selling Human Organs
On the other hand, the opposing side believes that people do not have the right to sell their organs to those who need them. Multiple people believe that you do not have the right over your own body. The OPTN/UNOS Ethics Committee suggests that the “Opponents of financial incentives point out that there would be potentially decreased emotional gain for the donor family, decreased respect for life and the sanctity of the human body, and a loss of the personal link that currently exists in the donation process” (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network). People should be generous, and be willing to give away their extra parts to those who are in need of said parts. Those who oppose the buying and selling of organs at Santa Clara University proclaim that “society may have a duty to preserve life and relieve human suffering, but not by any means whatsoever. In particular, society should not adopt any practices that would …show more content…
There are positive attributes to each opposing side. A bountiful group of people just in the United Stated alone would have been saved and would possibly still be alive today. There are some downsides to each side, but that is with any issue. All in all, the procurement of organs is becoming increasingly hard to supply because of the exponential demand. However because society is fearful of being able to buy organs it will be a long time before the sale of human organs is legalized.
I think that people should be allowed to sell their organs. If people were allowed to sell their organs it would boost the economy, make transplant lists outdated, and it would save more lives than it would harm. There is no harm in compensating people for getting sliced open and having an organ removed. I honestly think that this should have been done a long time ago. Overall, I believe that people should be able to buy organs because it would provide us with a better world of giving and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Organs For Sale Summary

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people are simply reluctant to donate their bodily parts. In response to the shortage, proposals have come forth advocating the sale of non-vital human organs.” (Andre, Claire, and Manuel Velasquez. " Organ Selling and Transplants." Organ Selling and Transplants.)…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pt2520 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The assignment requires the student to identify their personal views, and in exploring the relative merits of ‘opt-in’ and ‘opt-out’ approaches to organ donation, demonstrate their personal and academic learning…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the little cons and multiple pros towards transplants, as listed above, the positive side far out ways the negative side of transplants. In that conclusion, I personally would be very for transplants and would recommend everyone who can to become an organ…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree that this will be of some help to resolve the crisis. Countries are trying to resolve this shortage issue by implementing and revising their health systems. Some possible solutions include encouraging donors by implementing educational programs for the public and staff regarding the needs and benefits of organ donation. If the donors are aware of how helpful donating an organ is, the donor might trust the system of organ donation. If donors are able to empathize pervious patients’ stories, it could open their minds and produce a higher chance of willingness for organ donation (Hellmich, 2013). “Even a regulated system of organ sales will not prevent the inevitable back-door organ auction.” Despite the back-door option being unfair, I would have to disagree at some point. Indeed some will break and source for this option in order to gain profits to live a better life or for buyers who are sourcing for an organ donor. However, there is no blaming them as they might have been desperate for help. People die each day due to the lack or organ donors. If a person sells or donates their organ, even the tissue could help save a life (Beshears, 2013). Another disagreement that can be seen in Bramstedt’s argument is the priority wait-list. Indeed the wait-list will make a difference and help on who the organ should go to but she did not elaborate on what the list of…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander T. Tabarrok’s essay, “A Moral Solution to the Organ Shortage” Alexander explains ways to find solutions to the organ shortage by proposing a fair way to go about qualifying for organ transplant. Gary Becker suggested that paying a good amount of money toward funeral cost of organ donors would help and encourage people to donate their organs. The new rule that Alexander wanted to proposed is the “no -give - no - take” rule. Under this rule in order to receive an organ a person must have previously signed their organ donor card. Under “no - give - no take”, signing your organ donor card is like joining the club, the club of people who have agreed to share their organs. People have different views when it comes to donating organs. Some have their doubts about becoming an organ donor because of their religious beliefs, while others thinks that by signing an organ donor card it’s same as buying an insurance . NOTE In some ways I agree with Alexander on this new rule that he has proposed ( UNOS). Having a donor card is a good idea to make sure there is surplus of organs able to be donated. I’m not convinced that the “no- give no - take” rule will be productive to solve the shortage of our organ donors any time soon, since Alexander’s essay was based on suggestion. As for myself I would have doubt of donating my organs not because of my religion or beliefs, but the trust of the people that handling my organs. This essay has inspired me to rethink being an organ donor because of the problems of most organizations. In my own views, paying tremendous amounts of money to organ donors to saved someones life is a wrong way to help people that in need. As time progresses and suggestions becomes reality I would be more confident in donating my organs. NOTE…

    • 317 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There has always been a debate between creating a legal market for organs rather than accepting the fact that the black market will always exist. If there had to be a decision made regarding the legalization of organ purchases, my answer would be a definite no. Many people can argue and come up with plenty of reasons as to why it should or should not be legalized but in the end the meaning of an “Organ Donor” would be taken away.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Let's Pay For Organs

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the incentive for people to donate? Many believe that if the buying and selling of organs becomes legal, that this would be a unique way of not only saving thousands of lives every year, but also allowing many people to be pulled out of poverty and live a life where one’s family is provided for (Shafer and Cunningham, 2011).…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anotated Bibliography

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Organs are going to waste every year because not enough people are donating their organs. Many people choose to donate but their family members decide not to let them donate after they pass away due to the situation they are in. Different cultures agree that organ transplantation is a good act of kindness and many don’t disagree with it. The cultures only disagree with donation due to a vegetative state as being morally and ethically wrong. Many believe that a person in a vegetative state will come back to them but in reality they are brain dead and will never be able to function again. In this situation it draws many moral and ethical issues. Some say they are still living and will feel everything if they donate their organs. Others say in such a situation active euthanasia might be effective. These organs can save many other lives because millions of people are in need of an organ transplant. Family members have a say in whether those organs are donated but the decision shouldn’t be left to just them the patient’s wishes should still be honored after they are gone. The families are morally and ethically affected after their loved ones pass away and this can also cloud judgment. More organs could also be donated if we took into account the people who don’t die in a medical facility but also the ones who die outside. We need to improve the way the system is for donations so that many more lives can be saved. In the articles, they give me information that relates to each sub issues of morals and ethics as well as it gives me the…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to being immoral, opponents also tend to include that it is against their religion. This is a matter of state and religious views that are separate, making this argument is void. With it being immoral, that is hard to understand because currently it is legal to sell ones sperm, blood plasma, and other body parts/functions. It is also legal to use a surrogate mother. If someone wants to sell their own organs, then they should be able to sell their own organs to save a life. Opponents think that there will be businesses that will pursue organs for donation. It will then escalate so bad that people will turn to violence to get organs from people so they can sell them. These opponents think that the government will allow a market without regulations. Of course the government will regulate this. They will have set prices, restrictions which will probably include that the organ seller must also be the organ donor so stealing someone else’s organ would be completely pointless. Another argument made against the market is the fact that the procedure is dangerous. When a donor is making the decision, they’re usually made aware of the dangers and have to sign a waiver. Same will go for those who sell. Opponents also tend to argue that transplants don’t extend a person’s life for that much longer. According to government statistics, the majority of people are still living five years after the operation. Specifically these statistics include 69.3% of kidney operations, 74.9% of the heart, 73.8% of the liver, and 54.4% of the lung. From this, one can conclude that these transplants do help significantly in prolonging one’s life. (Analyses* what does this mean?) This argument the opposition makes can be easily dismissed. (Why can these be…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with your reply pertaining to an organ being priceless. However, I have a respected perspective for those who are for or against, some may even agree to disagree about organ sales. This problem exist today since this is just a controversial topic. For most this is a discussed topic for those who have experienced this tragedy as reality. What about those parents with children who work and their children walking to and from school, or playing outside and an unfortunate act for organ sales relocate nearby? The uninvited or unknown possibilities can hit close to one’s home. Individuals have the right to sign, seal and deliver their own body parts rather it is right or wrong but committing an unlawful act and to harm to others for pocket…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a controversy in today's society that organ donation only benefits the wealthy people, but without organ donation not even the poor will have hope for the chance of life. Most people live their lives not knowing the importance of organ donation until they are faced with this dilemma. Healthcare is experiencing a shortage in organ donation and the people that need these organs is only growing (Meckler, 2007). As people with good ethical morals, people are obligated to take part in organ donation because people are in need of organs and tissues, donors give a gift of life, and donors are the ones that minimize the need of organs and tissues in the U.S.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard A. Epstein puts forth a very convincing argument on selling organs; he brings up many factors which could persuade you to think the way he does on the issue of selling organs. Epstein argues that we should legalize selling organs. He presents both sides of the argument as well as a rebuttal to the opposite side of the issue.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays