Preview

Pros And Cons Of Oil Drilling Offshore

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
435 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Oil Drilling Offshore
Gavin McLuskie
Mrs. Karns
ALP English 10
Period 7
8 September 2017
Oil Drilling Offshore of the Atlantic Coast Introduction. Some argue that offshore oil drilling negatively impacts coastal economies and marine life. Others say that offshore drilling boosts the economy and is safe to marine life. Clearly, companies should not be allowed to drill oil off the coast of the Atlantic shore of the United States. Oil drilling off the Atlantic coast is lethal to the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale. Oil drilling companies use machines that expel sounds that can reach up to 240 db( Decibels). The seismic blasts threaten to injure or kill large masses of North Atlantic Right Whales (Offshore Exploring). If the machinery affects marine animals it is clearly harmful. Additionally, North Atlantic Right Whales are
…show more content…
When oil spills into the ocean it affects communities that rely on tourism and fishing. Drilling muds contain toxic metals like mercury, lead, and cadmium that can damage our seafood supply (Offshore Drilling). If oil drilling is harming our food supply it is therefore harming our economy. In addition, restaurants and other local businesses lose revenue and customers. Oil spills exact a serious toll on coastal economies, including billions of dollars of cleanup and damages (Offshore Drilling). Oil spills can devastate coastal economies so oil drilling is not worth the risk. If offshore drilling can lead to oil spills than it should not be legalized. Some may argue that offshore drilling is safe and that operators already take care to protect marine wildlife (qtd. In Offshore Exploring). Offshore drilling has had a 99.999 percent safety record since 1975 (Horton). This may be true; however oil spills still occur and are no doubt devastating to coastal economies ( Offshore Drilling). At this time offshore drilling is too risky to our environment to be made

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ANWR

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are several reasons why drilling should not be allowed in ANWR. One reason is that animals are on the brink of endangerment and extinction. Not talking about the ANWR animals…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ANWR pro drilling essay

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Drilling would not cause harm to the ecosystems and habitats that lay inside ANWR.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The recent explosion, deaths, and environmental impact of the deepwater Horizon oil drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico brought the question of drilling platform safety to the forefront of the news, continuing to do so over two years later. The disaster is one of the more recent events and “is the largest marine oil spill in history” (Cleveland, 2013).…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Fracking

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These stakeholders have historically maintained that their drilling and fracking practices are safe, and that there is little hard evidence to prove otherwise. The industries gas prospectors and producer are planning for what has been noted to be one of the largest new gas plays, stretching from West Virginia and Pennsylvania to the southern tier of New York. This play could possibly bring a number of jobs and revenue to the area along with increase the domestic natural gas utilization.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydraulic Fracking is a hot topic these days within the media of Ohio and locals of Licking County, Ohio. What issues and risk do we seem to currently need to be aware of? Could properties of local residents be affected and what step(s) are we taking to insure a brighter future for Ohio?…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hazards for wildlife include toxic effects of exposure or ingestion, injuries such as smothering and deterioration of thermal insulation, and damage to their reproductive systems and behaviors. Long-term ecological effects that contaminate or destroy the marine organic substrate and thereby interrupt the food chain are also harmful to the wildlife, so species populations may change or disappear”. The article meant that a lot of species that had been swimming, sitting , or even breathing in the oil had taken a turn for the worst and had been badly injured or most likely died which is one of the major effects that could continue to grow if nothing is…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing, also termed hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, or simply fracking, is hotly debated for its economic and environmental impacts. Fracking is the process by which rock is fractured by a pressurized fluid containing water. chemicals and sand to access natural gas, petroleum and brine from great depths of the Earth’s surface. Fracking produces the economic benefit of more accessible hydrocarbons, not to mention the 2.5 million fracking related jobs that were recorded in 2012 worldwide, one million of which were in the United States alone (FracFocus: ECHO-EPA Violations). However, many fear the environmental effects. Risks include ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, and an increase in seismic activity. Hazards to public health and the environment are yet to be discovered, because the first commercial application did not begin until the late 1940’s; however, hydraulic fractures have been recorded naturally throughout time (The Truth about…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Paper MGT/498

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2012), Chapter Four. Retrieved from…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, animals are dying because of Hydrofracking accidents. Researchers discovered that there is a range of health risks that are related to fracking and the other parts of the process, such as the chemicals that are injected deep underground and the toxic compounds that rise to the surface.The construction of roads, drilling pads and pipelines for thousands of drilling operations are adding up and impacting rural communities and affecting America’s landscape. The clearing of thousands of acres of forests is leading to reduced and fragmented habitats and other potentially life-threatening impacts for wildlife. Animals are starving , on the edge of life or death. Anorexic animals are everywhere near gaslands.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An article by Stephen L. Baird titled Offshore Oil Drilling: Buying Energy Independence or Buying Time? Looks at both sides of the issue. Baird cites several polls that show growing support for offshore drilling, and that energy exploration is more important than conservation. Baird states that America imports…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Foes

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bamberger, M., R.E Oswald and Forthcoming. "Impacts of Gas Drilling on Human and Animal Health." The New Solutions January 2012: 51-77.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bp Oil Spill

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Oil Spill, due to the mismanaged oil drilling by British Petroleum (BP), in the Gulf of Mexico, has turned into one of the worst environmental disasters to happen to an ocean ecosystem of all time. Although many people only notice the effects on the hydrosphere, which include the oil going almost a mile deep under the sea, destroying the sediment and rock on the ocean floor, as well as disrupting coastal patterns, many have not realized the drastic effects on the biosphere because of this catastrophic event. The BP oil spill is viewed as the largest decimation of ocean wild life known to man, as well as also killing human lives in the process. Entire ecosystems have been affected in the process, harming animals like whales, dolphins, fish species, pelicans, seagulls, sea turtles, etc., several of which are already endangered. This destruction of wildlife has also lead to a slowdown in many fishing industries, further affecting human life, and causing severe poverty for those who rely on such business to survive. Even if some of the animals did survive, the trauma faced from this experience will lead to reproductive problems, or most likely, death. Even though life is returning back to the Gulf, the damage done can never be replaced, and the area will never be the same.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is believed to be between 5.7 and 16 billion barrels of recoverable crude oil in Alaska. The only thing holding us back from drilling there because it would damage a protected national wildlife refuge in the act killing many animals. The controversy of whether to drill there or not has been going on since around 1977. The last two presidents we had were on different sides of how they felt about the drilling. There are many positives to drilling in Alaska but for every positive there is also a negative. For whether a person is for or against drilling is strongly based on how strongly they feel the importance of every effect of the drilling.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In late March of 1989, an oil tanker by the name of Exxon Valdez spilled between eleven and 38 million gallons of oil into the Prince William Sound in Alaska. This spill was caused by various influential factors, but perhaps one of the most important would be Exxon Shipping Company’s inability to oversee the condition of the crew, leading to a fatigued navigator who led the vessel astray, which resulted in the massive spill. This oil, which is, of course, hazardous to living creatures, resulted in the death of an estimated 250,000 seabirds, 2,800 otters, 250 bald eagles, 300 harbor seals, up to 22 killer whales, and billions of bird and fish eggs. Although some of these species have completely recovered from the incident, others continue to feel the impact to this day.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays