Preview

Pros And Cons Of Irving Coffman

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Irving Coffman
Culpability Humans are superior to other organisms due to our phenomenal ability to reason. It is foolish to believe that companies of harmful yet legal products are responsible for the problems their products cause. Irving Coffman states that it is right for tobacco companies to pay states settlements because of the “problems” tobacco causes. I disagree with Irving Coffman’s belief that it is right for tobacco companies to pay settlements to states, and I also disagree with his argument stating that other manufacturers of detrimental products such as guns and alcohol should pay similar fines. The benefits for states to allow tobacco use are enormous at the state level. Coffman thinks it is right for tobacco companies to pay for the problems
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Rethinking Our Right To Dangerous Behaviors By Mark Bittman
    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary Of Rethinking Our Right To Dangerous Behaviors By Mark Bittman

    In Rethinking Our ‘Rights’ to Dangerous Behaviors, Mark Bittman tries to bring attention to unseen or disregarded dangers to the average citizen about the often corrupt ways of Big Business. People often overlook the process of how a product reaches their hands. Most often people only care that they have something to consume, food, drink, medicines or cigarettes, or a product, cars or guns, to show off to friends and neighbors. “But Freudenberg details how six industries — food and beverage, tobacco, alcohol, firearms, pharmaceutical and automotive — use pretty much the same playbook to defend the sales of health-threatening products. This playbook, largely developed by the tobacco industry, disregards human health and poses greater threats to our existence than any communicable disease you can name.”…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Tobacco Case Summary
    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imperial Tobacco Case Summary

    I believe this because customers that smoked cigarettes but didn't know that it caused cancer should be compensated for all damages that has developed. And with anyone that 2nd hand smoked the product before product liability was put into action. (Although it might a bit harder to prove that). But anyone that develops cancer after Imperial tobacco put the product liability on their products should not be compensated. Imperial tobacco should pay for all the cigarette related medical care of the customers no matter what the damage is. Whether it be a new pair of teeth or a new lung.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edna Hacker Analysis
    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edna Hacker Analysis

    Edna Hacker’s statement that “no company should be made to pay for misuse of their products.” was wrong because she is comparing the use of tobacco and the use of other products such as cell phones and automobiles. Tobacco use and cell phone use, for example, are two different things that do not have any relationship with each other. Tobacco does not provide people with any benefits, using any kind of tobacco products lead numerous of health problem, and using tobacco can lead to addiction.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Government Intervention vs. Personal Freedom Essay Example
    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Government Intervention vs. Personal Freedom Essay Example

    Arguments can be made for the opposing side as well, but these arguments only consider the smoker, not the people that smoking affects. Where does government involvement end and personal responsibility begin? The preamble to the Constitution states:…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Smoking Behavior During Emerging Adulthood: A Longitudinal Analysis
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Smoking Behavior During Emerging Adulthood: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Being exposed to second hand smoke from burning tobacco products causes disease and early death among nonsmokers. Public policies help to make and enforce new laws that are beneficial to the public, for instance, smoke free laws that prohibit smoking in public places like bars and restaurants to help improve the health of workers and the general population, there for saving lives by sparing non-smokers from breathing in the second-hand smoke. Smoking does not just harm the smoker it also harms people nearby, who breathe in the smoke. Tobacco smoke can cause cancer, strokes and heart disease and public policies makes us aware, cigarette smokers and tobacco companies in check.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Does Tobacco Affect The Culture Of Native Americans?
    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Does Tobacco Affect The Culture Of Native Americans?

    Tobacco has been a cash crop in America since the first colonists settled here. In fact, many historians have said America would not exist as we know it without the original routes of tobacco here. While there are significant health risks with tobacco, it is an essential part of the American economy. In 2011, the huge sum of 17,653,708,000 dollars were collected in revenue from taxation on cigarettes (Tobacco Tax Revenue). Apart from this immediate benefit of the taxes, it also dissuades people, particularly youth, to smoke. “Every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces consumption by about 4 percent among adults and about 7 percent among youth”…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Tobacco Influence On Chesapeake Society
    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tobacco Influence On Chesapeake Society

    Every day in America, 3200 people smoke their first cigarette. [1] Tobacco has been a part of daily life for so long, we don’t think twice when we see someone take a smoke break, or buy a pack of Camels at the gas station. However, tobacco was once an even larger part of society. In the early 1600’s nearly everything one did was dictated by tobacco. In fact, it is thought by many that America would not exist today were it not for the boom of the tobacco industry in the seventeenth century. Tobacco was king, and it shaped every aspect of Chesapeake society, from the economy to the environment and even the politics with by the…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Major Tobacco Companies Paying For Public Health Care?
    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Major Tobacco Companies Paying For Public Health Care?

    Edna Hacker once said, “No company should be made to pay because people misuse its products.” Major tobacco companies have paid financial settlements to several states funding health care for smoking related illnesses. Should fast food restaurants pay health costs for obesity related illnesses? Customers abusing a company’s products is out of the companies control, and consumers should be required to pay for their own medical costs. While some studies that have been conducted may prove long term tobacco use harmful to the human body, tobacco companies should not be required to cover medical costs of smoking related type illnesses because similar conditions could be genetical or life-style based, the slippery slope of…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conterversal Essay on Tabacco
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conterversal Essay on Tabacco

    Smoking is the same thing as euthanasia. Someone sells another their death. Do you think that is human? If these tobacco companies know that they are selling a product that has already killed a huge fraction of our population? Do you believe that should be legal? The reason that many of these companies are prosperous is due to the addicts who grew up smoking. To them it has become very normal to smoke your lungs out every day several times a day but that is where the companies have to step in and show these people what they are up against. There are…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Speech: The Harm Of Cigarettes
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Persuasive Speech: The Harm Of Cigarettes

    hundred lives of course. I don't see how this is worth it, but who am I to the tobacco…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Criminals Should Be Tried As Adults
    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juvenile Criminals Should Be Tried As Adults

    Because of the harmful nature of their products, the tobacco industry should subsidize public health care.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cigarette Litigation
    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Cigarette Litigation

    In August 1970 a leading tobacco defense attorney, David R. Hardy, wrote a confidential letter warning that indiscreet comments by industry scientists, including references to biologically active components of cigarette smoke and the search for a safer cigarette, constitute a real threat to the continued success in the defense of smoking and health litigation. The actual knowledge on the part of the defendant that smoking is generally dangerous to health, that certain ingredients are dangerous to health and should be removed, or that smoking causes a particular disease. This would not only be evidence that would substantially prove a case against the defendant company for compensatory damages, but could be considered as evidence of willfulness or recklessness sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages.…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Textual Analysis of Thank You for Smoking
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Textual Analysis of Thank You for Smoking

    In the movie “Thank you for smoking”, big companies are seen as having no social responsibility with its consumers and the people that are affected by their products when they clearly know the negative effects and impacts that their products have in society. The big companies in the movie are the ones that belong to the tobacco industry and concentrate in the cigarette business. These companies are shown as not caring for the damage that tobacco does and that regardless of the effects of cigarettes on people, because they still want to sell their product in order to earn a profit. These companies fund an association called The Academy of Tobacco Studies, whose main purpose is to research the connection that may exist between cigarettes and lung cancer. In the association a very important employee named Nick Naylor, who is the main character of the movie, holds two very important roles, that of chief spokesman and vice-president. Nick Naylor has the hard job of representing the interests of tobacco companies in a society that finds tobacco despicable. In other words, he tries to persuade people that the tobacco companies and cigarettes are not bad for people, when globally it is known that tobacco kills. It is known that tobacco kills because it is the primary producer of lung cancer. Throughout the whole movie many clear evidences on how these tobacco companies have no social responsibility can be seen.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternative Strategies or Solutions to the Dilemmas Confronting the Tobacco Companies
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alternative Strategies or Solutions to the Dilemmas Confronting the Tobacco Companies

    (2).Can you recommend alternative strategies or solutions to the dilemmas confronting the tobacco companies? To governments? What is the price of ethical behaviors?…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    No Cigarettes, No Smoking
    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No Cigarettes, No Smoking

    The harm of smoking is a hot issue which has being discussed in many countries for a long time. There are 1.2 billion of smokers in this world, which is one-fifth of the world population. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that adult male smokers lost an average of 13.2 years of life and female smokers lost 14.5 years of life because of smoking. Even though people know that cigarette is bad for health, they still have freedom of smoking. Nowadays, both producing and smoking cigarettes are still free choices especially in America because as Americans we first protect our freedoms and the government gives us rights to choose our own ways of life include the free market economy for producing cigarettes and the freedom of smoking. But cigarettes have nothing good for health. It not only kills the smokers themselves but also harms the non-smokers by breathing second-hand smokers, which should be considered as murder. So governments should make law to stop producing cigarettes completely.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics