Preview

Pros And Cons Of Being Ratified

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Being Ratified
At one point in time many people were debating whether to ratify the Constitution, people took sides and some were supporters while others were opponents. The supporters and opponents both had major arguments and debates about whether the Constitution should or should not be ratified. The supporters major argument was that America has many problems and the only way to fix these problems is to ratify the Constitution, whereas the opponents major argument was that the new Constitution had too much major change and did not protect America’s citizens. The supporters mostly felt as though the current Constitution has many problems and common men across the United States struggle and complain because of the current Constitution. The supporters also felt that the current Constitution was made too much by people who did not know how to run a …show more content…
In Document 1 the author says, “Let us look and [see] the [problems that exist] in every part of our country . . . the complaints of our farmers . . . the complaints of every class of [people who loan money] . . . the [sad] faces of our working people . . . our ships rotting in our harbors . . . the insults that are [made against America] in every court in Europe”. The author who was a supporter of the Constitution being ratified talks about how many problems that the United States has under the current Constitution and he feels that the only way the problems can be solved is too ratify the Constitution. George Washington feels that people thought that they knew too much about how a confederation works when the first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1987 DBQ

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to how long ago the Constitution was written there are many issues and problems that are not stated in it or do not pertain to the time period. This causes tension and sectional discord among the states and eventually led to the separation of the Union. Document D shows how the Fugitive Slave Law is immoral and wrong. “…as soon as the Constitution ordains an immoral law, it ordains disunion,” meaning that if there is a law that is wrong in the Constitution it goes straight to disunion instead of amending the law. In Document G the only way to keep the Union together would have been to amend the Constitution because it didn’t include…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Study

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -Jeffersonian’s and Democratic republicans opposed it because they were strict constructionists ( they followed the constitution very strictly)…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a purpose for papers such as these, and the purpose here was to allay the fears of the people; the fear that this new Constitution wouldn’t work, the fear that there was no solution to the political instability the Articles of Confederation had, and the fear that the government would be too strong or controlling. The political instability at the time scared people because factions, (groups with common political interests that forced their opinions on others while disregarding…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Letter from the Rhode Island Assembly to Congress on November 30, 1782 was just one of the several statements disapproving of the Confederation. Document A is saying that the U.S. government is stripping the liberties of the states. Spending the money from the states and spending it on things the…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 DBQ

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document G shows President Buchanan’s message to congress which proves the Constitution is not working and needs an amendment. “In any event...themselves from the Union” shows how there is effort made to keep the union together and that amending the Constitution is necessary in doing so. In Jefferson Davis’ message to the Confederate Congress, Document H, he claims that it is “Strange, indeed...and over the States”. As a southerner he is speaking out against the growth of the Northern States and declaring that the Constitution was not a bond between the states, but a national government that was above the States. Additionally, President Lincoln’s message to congress in Document I, which says, “any state of...any other state”, proves that the constitution created a issue that continually grew until it eventually resulted in the failure of the Union it…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These historians do not believe Charles Beard's thesis and try to disprove his thoughts and prove that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are people having public security holdings, who are people from all different backgrounds. The Delegates mostly signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looking out for them. There was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to benefit the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the New York State Ratifying Convention shows that there was a mixes of people with different economic status voting for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to want…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be said that in a democracy, unity among the many cannot exist without compromise. Following the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War in 1776, the Articles of Confederation (the “Articles”) were written to allay fears about, and promote liberty, for its citizens, by legitimizing the rights of individual states. However, the Articles provided such restrictive powers for the underfunded national government to counteract deficiencies, that the union was at risk of collapse. A series of meetings, known as the Constitutional Convention (the “Convention”), was held to fix America’s dysfunctional political system, resulting in re-writing the American Constitution. Throughout the process of ratifying this historic document, many disputes…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1985 Dbq

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The colonists were living in a brand new country that had no track record. Considering that the articles of confederation had no precedent to follow, and no other government to imitate; the articles were fairly good. However, the Articles of Confederation could have been more effective than they were. Effective does not necessarily mean that the government was strong. It does mean that the government was able to provide the people with the kind of government they wanted and needed. Also, ineffective does not necessarily mean weak. The Articles were deliberately written for a weak central government, the colonists set it up they way they wanted to. Despite the fact that they one the revolutionary war, and they now realized that they were able to work together, they feared that a central government would cause each state to loose the civil rights which they have already gained. Therefore, the colonists deliberately made a weak central government. However, the kind of government which the people set up, through their own will created much uncertainty. The industrious people preferred security and quite and the government held too much uncertainty for them. If there is too much uncertainty, then they will agree to anything that will give them the security that they want. (Document G)…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it has created. This was shown by interpretations of the constitution and other documents when the constitution was assorted together.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story, Arguments against Ratification at the Virginia Convention was all about the delegates at the Virginia Convention debating the constitution and the ninth vote for ratification which many pushed for. In the book it says, “...the acceptance of only nine states would not have boded well for strength and unity of the new nation, so the Constitution's supporters set out to make ratification a unanimous mandate for change”. They pushed hard to convince nine states…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He points out that many of the states had participated in the revolution, which freed them from the British monarchy with the prospect of becoming individually governed states as prescribed in the Articles of Confederation, and did not regard this agreement as simply a temporary vehicle to unite their efforts. This is what he attributes much of the high esteem we, citizens of the USA, to this day hold the founding fathers. He remarks that they are revered as demigods and the ratification of the Constitution is nothing less than heroic (Pg 128). He then reinforces again, that the Constitution was the result no one could have anticipated given the basis of the Revolutionary…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the Revolutionary War reached its completion, the United States (U.S.) sought to form a permanent and strong nation. This prompted Alexander Hamilton to write the article, “Federalist No. 1” in supplication of the citizens of New York to ratify the Constitution. Hamilton believed that the Constitution would unite the United States under one central government and it was the duty of the American citizens to determine their form of government based off of the common good. He creates his argument by establishing the important choice U.S. citizens have, emphasizing that learning all information about both sides is crucial, and voicing his concern that one must not be swayed by their self-interests or cathartic ideals. It is through the creation…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US Constitution Process

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Document 1: It shows as though we aren’t self sufficient. It shows that other countries do not look at us with a good point of view because we don’t have self- government. The editor believes the ratifying of the Constitution will give us a stronger, well-organized government. The Constitution would help the U.S. protect its’ name and makeup and reinforce our trade.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is what many people consider the back bone of our nation. It was written in a time of need, when the federal government could not lead the country to the promise of a truly developed nation. Now, in 2016, 227 years later, this document still stands and makes sure our government does its job correctly and efficiently for the persons in their country. Although the Constitution became official, this did not happen without the compromise of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. These two sides had their say, yet they came to terms and both acquired what they wanted in the Constitution.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays