Preview

Pros And Cons Of Being From The Animal Kingdom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
696 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Being From The Animal Kingdom
People often refuse the idea of being from the animal kingdom to remove themselves from nature in order to justify their actions. Its believed that humans are not part of the animal kingdom because simply we have rational thinking and free will which animals don't have. Moreover, we have conscious that animals don't have, things that makes humans unique and characteristics that animals don't have or have different, according to science, things like Upright Posture, nakedness, hands, Brain size, clothing, fire, blushing, long childhood and mostly what really set us apart is our continuos and intelligence to evolve. These unique characteristics remove us from the animal kingdom. However this is not true. These characteristics make us unique and special but don't set us apart from the animal kingdom. …show more content…
There are abilities that animals have that we don't have such as infrared vision, the ability to fly and much more. But we don't exclude them form the animal kingdom because they have abilities that we or other animals don't have. According to science there are animals that have lesser levels of intelligence. Based on that, why should just one ability that some other animals do seem to have as well, be removed from the animal kingdom when we have everything else in common with them? Really, though, we consider ourselves different from animals the same way we consider family members different from strangers. We do have minds that let us decide what we want to be, and that is one of the things that does make us special from all animals but that doesn't make us divorced from our family, the animal kingdom. The most you can say is that us humans are currently the smartest living members of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin says that animals have the same human qualities that humans have. And with that they deserve more if not the same amount of respect as human beings. He gives many examples on how some animals are human like emotion and skilled wise. I disagree with Rifkin. I think that most animals should not get more respect than human beings reason being that most of the animals he listed are going to be killed and be used for reasonable human use.…

    • 396 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wild animals should not be pets, because there are big differences between domestic pets and wild or exotic animals. Exotic animals could hurt the ecosystem. In the article, "Should lions, tigers, and other animals be pets?" Kate Dylewsky states that "wildlife belongs in the wild." Because if exotic animals from other parts of the world released, ecosystems could be changed. Even worse, states have was against having wild animals. In the chart, exotic animals, from the website "Born Free USA," 19 states have banned ownership of wild/exotic animals. Also, people can get hurt by other people's exotic animals according to the Newsela article," in Connecticut, a woman was injured by her friends 200lb pound pet chip." And this accident could've…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The boundary between humans and animals should not even exist. With all the modern technology, scientists have discovered that they hold human characteristics, therefore should be granted rights that would render society’s views of them to change, or at least cause them to have some consideration towards animals. Besides, they supply us with food that provide us with nutrients as well medicine to keep us alive. Even if they are not humans, they are still living beings. We are all beings living in one planet. It’s time we act like…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although humans and animals have similar anatomies the two are completely different. Animals are not capable to think like humans and do the same things as humans like talking for example. Animals can’t communicate how would they be able to know what they can and can’t do in the society? Humans are given rights because they are somewhat responsible, but animals have no sense of responsibility because they have no duties in their…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What differentiates humans from animals is when it comes to mating some animals only mate to have offspring, which at this day and age for humans is not so true. Many people in America, have the ability to eat whatever, whenever; most animals do not eat just for fun or out of boredom, they eat to stay alive. If the animal is a pet it can be different because owners can feed them too much causing them to become…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taking a Stand Against Peta

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Animal rights debater Stephen R. L. Clark points out, “As humans, we are like the other animals and unlike them, tied to them and separate, in many ways,” (Golding). For example, humans are animals, our nature is an animal nature, our desires are, for the most part, animal desires, and our habit of hunting is like that of other animals. However, what sets us apart from other animals is the fact that we have legal rights (the right to vote) and moral rights (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness). The distinction must be made that animals obviously can't have the same rights as humans, because their interests are not always the same as ours, and some rights would be irrelevant to animals. For instance, an animal such as a cat doesn't have an interest in voting and, therefore, doesn't have the right to vote because that right would be as meaningless…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life Of Pi Theme Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Humans and animals are two different things; however, they can be the same. We consider ourselves different from animals because we don’t walk on all fours, don’t eat off the ground, we have manners, we know the difference between right and wrong, and we have free will. Although, animals have the ability to do what they want when they want,…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism treats human and nonhuman animal as same species, Sharfer-Landau (2015) explained, “utilitarians argue that animals are member of the moral community.” A qualification to be the moral community is to be able to suffer. Although nonhuman animal cannot talk like human nor express their feeling freely like human, yet they do suffer like human. Therefore, utilitarians consider human and nonhuman animal both as the moral community.…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can animals really think? Can they make decisions based on information? For years, scientists have debated these questions. Now many of them believe that some animals have the brain power to understand new situations, make decisions, and plan ahead. many animals adapt their behavior to the challenges they face either under natural conditions or in laboratory experiments. For example, on other parts of Africa chimpanzees select suitable branches from which they break ofg twigs to produce a slender probe, which they carry some distance to poke it into a termite nest and eat the termites clinging to it as it is withdrawn. Apes have also learned to use artificial communication systems to ask for objects and activities they want and to answer simple…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What separates us humans from the rest of the animal kingdom? The first thing that comes to mind is our brain and our ability to reason. Our brain is not the largest one in the animal kingdom, yet it allows us the capabilities that far exceed others. Being able to reason and think we can be introspective, be aware of right and wrong, and establish a justice system. With all those capacities, there come negative attributes as well.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my view animals are needed to understand humanity. Elvis’s herd exemplifies humanity because of their compassion, kindness, and consideration to accommodate her because of her deformity. In addition, stories like Elvis shows that “natural connection with the natural world and with animals.” Some might object to animals containing traits of humanity, of course, on the grounds that humanity can only be possessed by humans. Yet I would argue that humanity can be possessed by anyone or anything that is considerate, kind, and compassionate for others without seeking any gratitude for it. Overall, I believe the word or the trait “humanity” shouldn’t just be associated with humans--an important point given that most humans commit the most inhumane things…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument is based on more concrete facts that there are more differences and similarities between humans and non-humans. Therefore the rejection of speciesism is attributable to an historical continuing process. In the first stage traditional morality was accepted due to the general world view and acceptance. In the second stage the earth revealed not to be the Centre of the universe as such its special treatment lost meaning and Darwin sums that humans as well as animals are of the same order. Thirdly, the world view on morality having lost meaning on morality it calls for reexamination.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a common belief that a human is superior to any other animal, mainly because of the extended intelligence that the former is gifted with. However, it is my strong conviction that all living things are worthy of the same respect and deserve to be treated with the same consideration.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays