Preview

Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing
Pros for Animal Testing
The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many Medical Treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community and many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but still support Animal Testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease.
Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs prior to commencing Trials On Humans. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved – not simply from avoidance of the dangers of drugs but because the drugs themselves save lives as well as improve the quality of human life.
Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. As such, researchers do recognise the limitations and differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans.
Cons Against Animal Testing
In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use. It is this aspect of animal testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Therefore most of these animal tests are inaccurate. Diseases that may develop in humans are genetically engineered differently than any other animal. This relates back to the unethical side, as millions of animals are being tortuously killed just to be disposed of. Animal tests have no way of predicting the outcomes or results on a human, medical treatment is very specific to the individual being treated. Prescribed medicines are unique and are tweaked to work for that human specifically, testing on a whole new species does not effectively correspond to the human body.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 By George Orwell

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The scientific community is for animal testing because they see it that it is better for animals to suffer than humans. Animals greatly advance human medicine which is enough to overlook and justify animal suffering. On the other hand, those who are against testing products on animals see it as cruel. Researchers induce pain on animals, sometimes without the use of anesthetics. However, there is also a grey area where some people support it only under certain circumstances.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal testing for scientific or commercial use is wrong and inaccurate because animals are made up differently than humans. Animal testing is procedures done on animals for research to test medicine and commercial items to see if they are harmful or effective for humans. The experiments can cause the animals to have physical and mental suffering and distress. Most of the animals are killed at the end of the experimentation but some are used again in other experiments. The most common animals used for the experiments are fish, mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, hamsters, birds, cats, dogs, and monkeys. More than 115 million animals are used in experiments worldwide. Animals are living beings too, they should get the chance to live…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin (Occupy Theory, 1).” Since there can be new medications found from utilising this form of testing, many people see it as beneficial to the human population. Since it’s more beneficial to humans than it is a bigger hurt to the animal species, most people believe that animal testing is okay. But, according to William H. Farland and Vicki Vaughn-Dellarco, “Abelson comments that laboratory studies of chemicals and their use in risk assessment have not been shown to have substantially benefited human health (1908).” I had interviewed my AP Biology teacher Mr. Nolan Flores. He teaches regents biology, AP biology, and astronomy. Mr. Flores even teaches animal behaviors in biology so he has a basic knowledge of animals. When I had interviewed Mr. Flores he had talked about his personal view on animal testing. He concurred with the prior statement that if it is more beneficial to test on an animal because it could save someone's life, then he is for animal testing. For him, he also stated that it depends on the situation and if the testing is ethical or not. If it involves cruel or unusual punishment to the animal, then he is against…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that animals are the next best thing to a “whole-body” system, but animals have no say in what happens to them, thus making them the best thing to a whole-body system. Humans have a whole-body system as well, but no tests are done on them, because they have a say so. However, what people in the society do not know, is that animals are not the same as humans which then leads to inaccurate test data and false information. “94 percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.” (Animal Testing) This quote clearly states that testing on animals is innacurate, giving humans false information and proving that it is completely pointless and inhumane. There are many different ways to perform tests without using animals. Scientists are using bacteria and petri dishes and comparing and contrasting and finding out more information than they ever have by harming the…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal testing has unmistakably swept the globe in effort to further scientific exploration. It has been a useful tool of drug testing, cosmetic testing, xenotransplantation, behavioral education and other informative methodical studies. From the tens to one hundred million or more animals are used in scientific experiments around the world per annum (1). An estimated eighty to eight hundred animals are used to test one drug before it is considered safe for human consumption (1). Although some may have genuine concerns about animal testing- from relevance of data to ethics-many support it because the benefits of animal experimentation to human life far exceeds any negative aspects.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Pros

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Scientists typically use animals for testing purposes because they are considered similar to humans. As such, researchers do recognise the limitations and differences but the testing is done on animals because they are thought to be the closest match and best one with regards to applying this data to humans…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered what animal testing has helped us accomplished? Also, what it has done to our lives? I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it allows us to test medications before they are given to people and has helped us uncover other important things.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have been using animals to conduct experiments and tests since ancient times. Over the years, the practice of using animals has been under fire by animal protection and animal activist groups. Using animals for drug testing has become an important part of scientific experiments but it has also led to the deaths of millions of animals. When animal testing goes wrong, it can harm the users whom it is supposedly benefiting. The use of animal testing should be abandoned because it does not predict accurate results in human beings, it kills animals, and there are alternate testing methods that exist which do not involve the use of animals.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are the next best test subjects that can prove products safe for use by people. I believe animal testing is a crucial aspect that benefits human society, though it must remain hidden in the shadows because the truth about animal testing is surrounded by myths and emotion, without a great deal of facts and applied critical thought. Animal testing has been used on many products that are all around you, especially medicine, and you should accept this point and be appreciative of the hardworking medical researchers that aim to keep us safe with their work and to understand that animal testing offers benefits to you and your loved…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cellular, anatomical, and metabolic differences between humans and animals are very significant. This makes them bad test subjects. All the differences between humans and animals,the studying of disease on them can give us the wrong information. Making and developing cures for diseases can be wrong. Ninety percent of the drugs test on animals don't work for human…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scientist researches say that animal testing is the future to finding cures and helps them figure out what will work and not work on humans. Hence, it can help find cures faster and prevent more human death. Although some people believe that is true; I, therefore have different opinion. Reading through articles from different doctors made me realize that using…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is not accurate. First of all animals react to medicine differently than humans do. For example, thalidomide causes birth defects in humans, but not in rats, mice, and hamsters. 50% of drugs that have been approved by animal testing have to be removed because of harmful side effects in the U.S. There is actually no evidence stating that animal testing leads directly to saving lives. Also, 82% of animal testing procedures use rats, mice, and rodents, which are not like humans. Testing chemicals on animals is useless.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those who are in favor of animal testing justify it many different ways. Thomas Hamm, a toxicologist and veterinarian, argues that, “We can’t protect the environment, or people in general, without doing some animal testing. If you’re pro-environment but opposed to animal testing, you’re on shaky ground, because the two positions just aren’t compatible with each other” (Fano, 44). In order to have a safe and successful society, he argues, we must use animals to test chemicals, drugs, treatments, and anything else that will further our knowledge of improving the world, at least for humans. Many people are of the same mind as Hamm. Animal testing reduces the risks of many products, like cosmetics and medication, among many others. Scientists can put safety standards in place for products based on their findings via animal testing. Often, animals will react badly or even die from certain chemicals or combinations, make the humans that use the products…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics