Preview

Pros And Cons Of A Consolidated Government Of The Southern States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of A Consolidated Government Of The Southern States
"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and institute a new government." (Declaration of Independence 1776)
The southern States now stand almost exactly in the same position as our ancestors did some 85 years ago. The difference is that Great Britain made no pretense that we were equal and had an equal say in matters. The Northern States, having the majority in Congress, claim the same power over us in legislation as the British Parliament did. The government of the United States has become a consolidated Government, and the people of the Southern States are compelled to meet the very tyranny their fathers threw off in the Revolutionary War. The tariffs which were imposed upon the South, forcing us to buy products from the North, sounds similar to what Great Britain did in the past does it not? "The reason for possible secession will be found at the foundation of our political fabric, in our complex organism, in the fundamental law, in the Constitution itself, in the conflicting constructions which it invited, and in the institution of slavery which it recognized and was intended to protect." (John B. Gordon)
…show more content…
We gained our independence, freedom and sovereignty from the mother country and had not surrendered these upon entering the Union; by the terms of the Constitution all rights and powers not delegated were reserved to the States. We feel a growing need for freedom from the central Federal authority in Washington D.C. We feel that each state should have state rights and make there own laws. We do not want to take over the government and run the states as the north does, but rather want a fair say in issues that concerned the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As inevitable as the U.S. Constitution feels today as the foundation on which the United States of America and its political system are built, it was not the first document ratified by the former British colonies to establish a union. During the years of the American Revolutionary War and the years directly following it, the newly formed United States of America were essentially a collection of thirteen more or less sovereign states loosely held together in an alliance by the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (Articles of Confederation). However, as a foundation for a functioning government, the Articles of Confederation were lacking, leaving the federal government essential powerless and unable to effectively execute the few powers explicitly bestowed upon it by the Articles. Fiscal issues and rebellion threaten to tear the young nation…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Preston quickly established the viewpoint of the south in his speech: the states had the right to secede. The premise of his argument was that each state had given power to the federal government but still retained “sovereign capacity” (Preston 1). Sovereign capacity meant that the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution was ratified in 1787 to make a stronger and better central government. Although it was hard to get it ratified, especially in the southern states, it was meant to keep the country together and to be the extreme law of the land. This document, although nearly perfect, did not mention slavery at all, as William Lloyd Garrison states in document B. This, to some extent, caused the nation to rip apart, but it was not the only thing that did. Although some people believe that the constitution caused disunity among the union it was not the constitution itself, but many different factors like the compact theory and slavery which angered either the north or the south.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is defined as the division of power between central government and regional governments, but the addition of new principles into the American federal government overcomplicates the true definition of federalism, generating about five hundred theories. For example, dual federalism declares that the power of the national government and states are different and separate like a layered cake, while cooperative federalism states that the national government and state governments undertake government functions together by sharing power with no overruled power over the other.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Jefferson wrote, "…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…" Clearly describe three examples from any period of American History when Americans attempted to follow these words.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GOV 2305

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government……

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today everyone says the reason the South left the Union was; Slavery. Slavery was not the only factor that led the South to secede. In fact, some of the wealthiest slaveholders opposed secession. They believed, for good reason, that slavery would actually be safer in the Union than out of it. Most people aren’t aware that, even as president, Lincoln supported a proposed constitutional amendment that would have guaranteed slavery’s continuation forever. Lincoln mentioned his support for this amendment in his first inaugural address. Another factor that led to the South seceding was the way the North Republicans and the way they voiced their feelings towards the south. I believe the North would have put up a protest towards the South, but nothing as big and bloody and unnecessary as what initially ended up happening between the states.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cmc 240 Final Project

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “To secure these inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed…Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.” - Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Math

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations,…

    • 4047 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism involves the sharing of powers between different levels of government. In the United States this relates to the government at national level (the federal government) and those at the level of the state. The United Kingdom is not a federal state instead it is a unitary state where power is held in one place (parliament). Federalism is the process of sharing power between a central government, in America’s case Washington, and the States. The US Constitution dictates what areas the Federal Government have control of and the areas that the States have control of. Amendment 10 of the Bill of Rights dictates that any area that is not a power of Congress, President or Supreme Court it is up to the States to decide. Dissimilarly to the UK, Britain has adopted the unitary system which means that there is just one main body of government as opposed to powers being distributed across the nation. Over time, federalism has adapted and changed and the theory of New Federalism was introduced after Nixon’s and Reagan’s administration and was further mentioned under George W. Bush’s presidency.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff Crisis

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also eventually became a factor in causing the southern states to nullify the Union itself, bringing about their secession and the creation of the Confederacy. Although the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was passed, which mollified the South Carolina legislature and caused them to withdraw the Ordinance of Nullification, unrest in the southern states continued, eventually leading to the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. It also had a tremendous effect on the framers of the Confederate Constitution that they thought it was necessary to write into their Constitution a clause that forever settled the issue of protective tariffs within their new country. Unlike the Federal Constitution, which requires a supermajority of states to call for an amendment, the Confederate Constitution only requires three states to call for an amendment to be brought up before a national convention…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1787, America’s democracy has strengthened not only the inhabitants of the country but has influenced other countries to follow in our footsteps and let democracy flourish over them. These nations range from France, Australia, Brazil, and Russia which all have allowed democracy in and have benefited from its presence. With the power that democracy holds, this country should preserve it and continue to better its principals. As these principals are improved, this increases the possibility of a greater liberty and justice. The government must continue to not intervene in the lives of Americans when not called upon, so as to have total liberty.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays