Project Management and Evaluation

Topics: Project management, Decision making, Project planning Pages: 8 (2738 words) Published: March 13, 2014
ASSIGNMENT 02…POLICY MONITORING & EVALUATION.....
QTN…“If Monitoring and Evaluation is to be useful to managers, donors, participants and citizens, then the work must be honest, objective and fair. Data must be collected accurately and reporting done truthfully”. Monitoring and evaluation serves as an essential tool for ensuring sound management within the lifetime of projects or policies. There are certain activities that must be done to put into consideration the cost, time, feasibility and useful means in relation to identifying the maximum amount of information needed to meet the need of monitoring and evaluation. In essence, there should be comprehensive information that cover the full range of the required inputs, outputs, outcomes and impacts which should focus on the monitoring and evaluation purposes. Essentially the vitalness of monitoring and evaluation will be reflected upon the collection of data and information which are relevant, efficient, effective and sustainable, in relation to the aims and objectives which the stakeholders of the project or policy needed in accordance with their interest. For monitoring and evaluation to become valuable to managers, donors, participants and citizens, then the effort must, be straightforward, purposive and reasonable. It is the obligation of those involved in such activities of monitoring and evaluation to make sure that the data are collected accurately and that reporting is undertaken truthfully. The essay focus on discussing monitoring and evaluation work which constitutes honesty, objectivity, and fairness in relation to how useful it can be to managers, donors, participants and citizens. Also too, the collection of accurate data and undertaking truthful reporting which could be essentially important to undertake necessary adjustment within the lifetime of projects. Initially, it will base discussion on the usefulness of carrying out honest work of monitoring and evaluation and the significance it stresses, in relation to managers, donors, participants and the citizens. Moreover, it discusses the vitalness of undertaking the work which reflects the objectives. Furthermore, the usefulness of carrying out fair work, and finally, it focus on the essence of accurate data collection and undertaking truthful reporting on feedbacks of projects or policies.

To start of with, monitoring and evaluation focus on searching for answers about development interventions that can be done at different times in the life cycle of the project, therefore any necessary requirements should be undertaken carefully. The work involves gathering, analysing, interpreting and reporting information on project performances. For instance, the work of monitoring and evaluation are important to such extent as providing the stakeholders with better means for learning from past experiences, improving service delivery, planning and allocating resources and demonstrating results as part of accountability to key stakeholders. Managers, donors, participants and citizens each perform certain distinctive roles and interests in which they emphasise on various perspectives in response to the work of monitoring and evaluation. The work of monitoring and evaluation can be essentially vital for managers who oversee implementation, donors and other decision makers who influence or decide the course of action related to the project. The citizens whose situations the project seeks to change and participants who implement actions of the project (Wobiro, A. 2002; p47). For monitoring and evaluation to be advantageous, then the work must be honest, objective and fair, and so there should be precise data collection and reporting to be carried out truthfully in such a way it will be significant to concerned audiences. The work of monitoring and evaluation should be honest to ensure honesty and integrity in having respect to the safekeeping, dignity and self-worth of respondents to surveys, the project...


Bibliography: ......

Kellogg Foundation (2002), Utilization Steps: Communicating Findings and Utilizing Results in Evaluation Handbook Kellogg Foundation: http://www.wkkf.org/pubs/Pub770.pdf.
Rossi, P. H; & Freeman, H. E; (1989), Programs, Policies and Evaluation in Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Fourth Edition in Wobiro, A (2002), Policy Monitoring and Evaluation, Resource Booklet, School of Business Administration, Public Policy Management Strand, UPNG Open College, Waigani Campus, National District.
United Nations Population Fund (2001), The Programme Manager’s Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/ooe/toolkit.htm
Wobiro, A. (2002), Policy Monitoring and Evaluation, Study Guide, University of Papua New Guinea Open College, Waigani Campus, National District.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Project Management Essay
  • project management Essay
  • Project Management Research Paper
  • Project Management Strategy: Five Project Phases Essay
  • Essay on Project management
  • Project Management Essay
  • project management Essay
  • Project Management Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free