Preview

Prohibit Further Use Of The No Child Left Behind Act Of 2002

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prohibit Further Use Of The No Child Left Behind Act Of 2002
Prohibit Further Use of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002
I stand to affirm the legislation to prohibit any further use of the No Child Left Behind Act. The goal that is stated in the act is that “All students are expected to meet or exceed state standards in reading and math by 2014.” which has failed. In 2013 only 38 percent of those tested scored as proficient readers on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the “Nation’s Report Card,” released by the Department of Education . At 38 percent it is nearly impossible to gain that other 62 percent by 2014 which proves the act as an overall failure.
Along with the waste of $25.7 billion dollars in 2014, according to the New America Foundation, and failing of the program, the act brought more harm to the overall proficiency of students across America. Ironically, even when the act provided schools with more qualified teachers, test scores were not improving the way that was intended despite the good looking scores at the schools. These scores were due to the fact that schools were making their curriculum as easy as possible in order to make it less difficult for the students to do well on their tests and get extra funding from the government. This unfair gesture harmed the students by not teaching them anything and just passing them along to the next grade even if it was obvious they would still be struggling.
After the No Child Left Behind act was passed, schools were given a set of standards that were required to be followed when hiring a teacher in order to find the best possible educators for the schools. Now, having more qualified teachers for schools sounds like it would have an immensely positive effect on the education system however, the NCLB act set these standards extremely high which made it very difficult for schools to find teachers who met those requirements.
According to the Washington Post, after No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was established, the US slipped from 18th in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Darling- Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating 'No Child Left Behind ' | The Nation." The Nation 21 May 2007: 1-5. CQ Researcher. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act is an update of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. This legislation calls for state and local school districts to considerably raise expectations for students in the subjects of mathematics and reading. The No Child Left Behind Act was enacted because of the need to give students the skills necessary to succeed so that more jobs stay in America, to ensure students are not being shuffled through their school system, and to give students extra help in their weak subjects.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    School to Prison Pipeline

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In 2001, then-president George Bush sought to save the children and reverse poor educational trajectories with what seemed to be a well thought out plan. The ‘No Child Left Behind’ Act would save our youth and close the gap between urban youth and wealthy children and the way they are taught from birth to college. This act would allow all children to receive the education they deserved no matter their race, gender, social class, or US citizenship. Through a standardized test based curriculum, these children would, in theory, have equal opportunity to receive top-notch education by highly qualified teachers in great schools. Higher test scores would lead to increased funding and more resources, thus perpetuating a cycle of change for the better. The very name was held up as an emblem of equality and hope for many poor, immigrant urban or otherwise marginalized children and families, who without this act would be left to fend for themselves in a failing system. No Child Left…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many school teachers and community members are starting to challenge many of the features of the No Child Left Behind Act. Many people feel that the law was developed too quickly and that it was pushed through Congress. For many years, both Democrats and Republicans have supported the limited role of the federal government in education. Now after the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act, many schools feel like they have lost the local control they once had. Democrats and Republicans should challenge the No Child Left Behind Act. Even though the No Child Left Behind Act has good intentions to help children, there are many hazardous strategies involved. The No Child Left Behind Act may do more harm than good. The strategies in the No Child Left Behind Act do not contain…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum which the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a phrase that appears 111 times in the act) (Hammond 4). While standardized curriculum and increased standards seem like they would improve children's learning, in reality it hurts them by pushing them too hard academically instead of focusing on social development, and denying them specialized attention based upon their individual abilities.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article reports the results found by a national survey taken by the state, about the national impact of the No Child Left Behind bill. Results indicate that in between 2001 and 2005 statewide assessment of science and writing increased but it decreased in the social studies, arts, humanities, and computers. The research teams found that there are few themes that come up at almost every school. The first, which is an obvious one, is that for subjects that are not tested for under the No Child Left Behind bill, the schools reduced their resources and the effort that the school puts into these areas dropped. Second, is an interesting method because they take material away from tested subjects and integrating them into the classes that are not tested for. Just so the teachers that are going to be tested have more time to focus on the testing material. The last theme is that there is no change observed, everything seems to be the same as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Every parent wants to have the best education possible. State and local government have always been responsible for education from kindergarten through 12th grade. The federal; government was more for equality of education. The federal government, state and local authorities have all proposed ways to make education better for everyone. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act was proposed just for that reason. Even though it was proposed by the federal government, the states still set the standards for the testing. Since the proposal and enforcement of the act, there has been a great debate about the effectiveness; however there is data that shows the constructiveness of this act outweighs the pessimistic views.…

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002, is a comprehensive overhaul of the federal governments requirements of state and local education systems (www.nclb.gov). It reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and replaces the 1994 Improving Americas Schools Act.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The No Child Left behind Act is the central issue of debates in the educational arena. In wanting to provide accountability and close the achievement gaps between various sub-groups of the population, the federal government enacted NCLB in 2002.The act focuses on four pillars: stronger accountability, freedom for states and communities, proven educational methods, and more choices for parents. Since its inception, it has been surrounded by controversy. The (NCLB) divided decision makers from local school systems all the way to the federal level.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the core of the No Child Left Behind Act were a number of measures designed to drive broad gains in student achievement and to hold states and schools more accountable for student progress. They represented significant changes to the education landscape (U.S. Department of Education, 2001).…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays