Preview

Product Liability Term Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Product Liability Term Paper
Florida A&M University
School of Business and Industry

The Ethical and Legal Issues of Product Liability

Courtney Jordan

April 18, 2015

BUL 5323: Legal Issues and Environment

Introduction
Product liability refers to a manufacturer or seller being held liable for placing a defective product into the hands of a consumer. Responsibility for a product defect that causes injury lies with all sellers of the product who are in the distribution chain. This includes the manufacturer of component parts (at the top of the chain), an assembling manufacturer, the wholesaler, and the retail store owner (at the bottom of the chain). Products containing inherent defects that cause harm to a consumer of the product, or someone to whom the product was loaned, given, etc., are the subjects of products liability suits. While products are generally thought of as tangible personal property, products liability has stretched that definition to include intangibles (gas), naturals (pets), real estate (house), and writings (navigational charts).
Products liability claims can be based on negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty of fitness depending on the jurisdiction within which the claim is based. Many states have enacted comprehensive products liability statutes. These statutory provisions can be very diverse such that the United States Department of Commerce has promulgated a Model Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA) for voluntary use by the states. There is no federal products liability law.
In any jurisdiction one must prove that the product is defective. There are three types of product defects that incur liability in manufacturers and suppliers: design defects, manufacturing defects, and defects in marketing. Design defects are inherent; they exist before the product is manufactured. While the item might serve its purpose well, it can be unreasonably dangerous to use due to a design flaw. Present in a product from the beginning, even before it is manufactured,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. What sort of negative outcomes are possible for this type of risk? (1-3 sentences. 1.0 points)…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to (Melvin, 2011) “Products liability refers to the liability of any seller (including the manufacturer, retailer, and any intermediary seller such as a wholesaler) of a product that, because of a defect, causes harm to a consumer.” (P.226). Sally could argue BUGusa were negligent by not including the insulation needed on the equipment just to save on production costs. However, a more appealing option for Sally to pursue would be a strict liability tort because she doesn’t need to prove the elements of negligence. Sally could argue that BUGusa are strictly liable for her injuries because they placed a product on the market without insulation and she was injured as a…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    for strict liability torts. BUGusa, Inc. failed to provide an insulator in their original design for their wire tappers due to the production cost. BUGusa, Inc. has since realized its mistake, yet did not recall the older versions of the equipment, leaving Sally at risk of injury, which is exactly what happened. Strict Liability can be defined, as; “the legal responsibility for damages or injury, even if the person found strictly liable is not at fault.” (USLegal.com, 2014). Under this definition, Sally does not have to prove that BUGusa, Inc. was negligent in their actions producing their product, just that the product in question was defective, and it caused her…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kolchek Negligence Case

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. 1. The product must be in a defective condition when the defendant sells it.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that there has been a state level business dispute which is submitted to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). So here, I will discuss about the various methods of ADR. Also, I will suggest/recommend which method of ADR should be used to resolve this case out of court. Further, there will be some discussion on differences between traditional litigation process and ADR.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9 2 work file 1 rs

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. The Lemon Law says that the   is responsible for taking care of the defects.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Lake Essay Example

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Strict liability is the term used to describe situations in which a person can be held liable for damages caused to another person even without negligence or other fault. Strict liability means “liability without fault,” therefore a person is liable whether or not they were negligent and whether or not they intended to do any harm. The law imposes strict liability on inherently or abnormally dangerous activities, or activities that are likely to cause…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rampton, R (August 26, 2008). Canada Says 12 Dead in Food Poisoning Outbreak. Reuters. Retrieved March 31, 2012 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/08/26/us-meat-idUSN2526525120080826…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus 670 Final Paper

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In order for a corporation to be successful it should produce products that are effective and reliable. To create a product that is high quality and a low price is the idealistic procedure that any business should operate on. High profits for corporations do not always develop as planned. Problems find there way into the market for several reasons. There can be several reasons why problems find their way into the market. When products have a defect may hurt a consumer products get recalled. A product is supposed to be recalled when the company finds out it is dangerous to the consumer because of a defect, or has killed or injured from the defect, or does not met government set requirements (May, 2009). Companies, when these problems arise, have to decide to recall the item in question or to allow it to stay in the market. Product recalls would continue without companies being held to ethical standards, thus encouraging companies to ignore when they build unsafe items that could harm or kill innocent people possibly.…

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: The parties to do or not do a specific thing must base it on a mutual agreement. Parties who are competent to enter into a contract that will be enforceable against both parties must make it. The promise or obligation of each party must be supported by consideration. It must de for a lawful purpose the contract must not be illegal such as the unauthorized buying and selling of narcotics. The contract must meet certain formal requirements such as being in writing or under seal.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although a firm can assure that a product is safe through design, a firm cannot guarantee complete product safety to the consumer. For example, Conair, a producer of electric hair dryers, includes illustrated tags warning the user not to use the product near water. However, it is possible that a product goes out the door with bad wiring and causes an electric shock to the user. A firm can and should take every precaution and effort to ensure product safety from design through production to consumer, and should be prepared to be liable for product malfunctions. With large companies, like Ford and Firestone, it can be difficult to have complete visibility of production and monitor every product going out the door for safety issues. However, user error does not make product safety invalid. For example, a can of hairspray is safe to use as long as it is not near open flames and/or punctured. However, should a user disregard product safety warnings, the product can become unsafe and potentially deadly. Because of the always-present possibility for user error or a lack of quality or safety assurance on the assembly line, a firm cannot fully guarantee complete product safety.…

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz 2

    • 592 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. Specific performance is a limited remedy as it is only available for breach of contract to sell a unique item.…

    • 592 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As your Injury Lawyer Ottawa will explain to you, the food poisoning lawsuits come under the purview of the defective product liability claims. It is based on the premise that a defective product in the form of food has been sold to you and that you suffered from injury in the form of food poisoning or infection.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Tort Reform

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tort liability, also known as product liability inhibits innovation and other economically desirable activities. Manufacturers in the US have become reluctant to test out new products for the fear of…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics