Probable Cause Of Police Arrest

“According to the United States Constitution, it does not use the word “arrest” the fourth amendment provides: “The right of the people to be secure in the their persons, Against unreasonable… seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants hall issue, but a probable cause, particularly describing the person to be seized(Gless 279).” The true definition of arrest is the use of authority to deprive a person of his or her freedom of movement. Most of the time an arrest is made with a warrant.
Meanwhile an arrest could be made without if the probable cause with certain circumstances are presented the time of being arrested. The use of physical restraint or handcuffs is not always necessary. It is when a police officer simply tells a crime suspect that he or she is “under arrest”. During the situation suspects summits without the officers use of physical force. The main purpose, authority over a person, and that person’s voluntary or involuntary submission. Automatic arrest can occur under
The officer may arrest that person based on probable cause. An example of probable cause is that a small bank just got robbed, and then sees a person who matches the suspect description running down the street near the bank. (The officer detains and searches the man, finding a gun and a large amount of money in his pockets. Due to probable cause the officer can arrest the man that he committed the robbery at the bank. A person with an arrest warrant can also be arrested. The police officer has obtained a valid warrant to arrest a person, the arrest is considered lawful. In the Chartacoures the example is US vs Draper (1959). “The arrest, search and seizure were lawful, and the articles seized were properly admitted in evidence at petitioner’s trial. Pp. 358 U. S.