Probable Cause And Frisk Essay

Chapter 8, Article 1: NYPD issues new stop-and-frisk rules Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in
Scott Harr, Karen M. Hess, Christine Orthmann, and Jonathon Kingsbury, was the utilization of a proper stop and frisk. As a matter of fact, according to one article, the New York City Police Department, (NYPD), as of 2015, where given new rules, and step-by-step instructions with respect to educating their officers in properly conducting a stop and frisk (Blau, Parascandola, and Tracy, 2015). As indicated by the article, the purpose behind these new principles was a result of most officers exploiting the act of a stop and frisk to violate the rights of certain minority groups (Blau, Parascandola, & Tracy,