Preview

Pretty Woman Marxist Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pretty Woman Marxist Analysis
In Marxism, Marxian class theory asserts that the structural placement of individuals in class hierarchy, is determined not just by the distribution of power, wealth and prestige within a society. But also by the oppression of those in subordinate classes. (Katsiaficas & Kirkpatrick, 1987)
“For Marx, the struggle among and between social classes results in the transition from one type of society to another.” (Katsiaficas & Kirkpatrick, 1987, pp. 234-235) Contest between the rich and the poor is a theme common in the films, ‘The talented Mr Ripley’, ‘Pretty Woman’ and ‘Titanic’, where individuals attempt to overcome the void between social classes by different means. It is through symbolism and narrative techniques that a Marxist approach
…show more content…
A smooth transition into the wealthy school boy he never was, Dickie and fiancé Marge are quick to accept him into their lives. Ripley begins to detach himself from the reality of the world he belonged to as he takes great lengths to continue living a capitalist lifestyle to which it appeals to him greatly. Welcomed into their lives only by deceit, it is similar to prostitute Vivian in the film Pretty Woman after being hired as a trophy girl for wealthy business man Edward. Upon her first visit to an upperclass clothing store she receives a number of snarly remarks before she is kicked out of the store, we gather solely on the clothes she wears. Which in film is a strong representation to the social class in which one …show more content…
And they cant so they turn to crime and murder. What this shows is the wrongness of the lower class figure because what is really needed is the over turning of the system. At the moment the only way he can achieve getting on that level is by illegal means and individual crime.

Pretty woman. Marx said something about all human relations being reduced under capitilism to the cash nexus. You could say a Marx analysis would be interested in how she tries to appear like a member of the opposite social class. Theres also a point that marx says . marx is blind to sexual relationships. Men exploited women before they were capitilists. So it cannot be argued that this use of women is slely down to capitalism. Patriarchy existed before capitalism. Patriarchy is as old as adam and eve .

Look for things that exemplify what were talking about. Find things that symbolize

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today in society as many people know there are many ways to categorize people into different “social classes.” There has been many people who have tried and had labels for people in each “social class.” However, Karl Marx and Max Weber are well known in sociology classes for having certain criteria to classify people into their classes. We see that Both Marx and Weber has offered theoretical descriptions of how people are stratified into “social classes.”…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DD102

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The identity of ‘class’ is often called the ‘unspeakable identity’. The reason for this may be that class refers to inequalities based on a small group of people that occupy a greater position within society. Class identity can therefore be defined as ‘a group or collective identity that links economic inequality and social differences, including superior or inferior status and differences of family background and lifestyle’ (Open University, 2015). Inequalities of class are part of British social history with famous theorist Karl Marx being one of the first social scientists to focus on social class. According to Marx there are two classes of people within society, these being the bourgeoisie and the proletariats, or in other words the employers and the workers.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M2: This table shows that people who live in most deprived areas are more likely to smoke, are less likely to have a good education, they more than likely lived in poverty as a child. This table also shows that the least deprived people are the people with the most education and then end up becoming a professional or a manager. The Marxist approach would suggest that the least deprived are the ruling class and the most deprived are the working class in the hierarchy Marxists believe the most deprived people shouldn’t have an education they think they should be working for the least deprived people (Middle class) in factories and other places like that, they know that the most deprived may get ill from the working conditions but they don’t have to pay very much for the labour.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Karl Marx, the author proclaims that the struggles of the poor are caused by the greedy rich members of society taking advantage of the lower class. At the time, there were many workers who were exploited by their employers due to the complete lack of labor laws. Marx’s knowledge of his audience helped him to create an argument that appealed to abused workers; and slowly eased them into his revolutionary ideas for overthrowing the upper class.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (9)In the Communist Manifesto, you learn mankind's ongoing struggle has been linked back to Ancient Roman Times where individuals are socially ranked. In societies that are ranked, there is also differences between individuals that are the poor and the rich. Conflicts between bourgeois and proletarians have often been seen as one taking advantage of the other through the work the other is doing. And while taking exploiting the worker, they treat them as a bystander. The Communist Manifesto defines Marxism as each person being categorized by the position of the role of an owner or worker in Marx’s view.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let us think about the idea of labor and wages among women of different economic status. Bourgeois women who are married to bourgeois men probably can be supported economically by their husbands and do not have to work. They would not then be concerned with the gender pay gap, as they remain in the private sector. Proletarian women married to proletarian men, on the other hand, probably need to work. They would be keenly aware of the gender pay gap. This is something that such women have struggled against since they entered the workforce. Liberal feminists lobbied for equal pay for equal work, which contributed to the passing of the US 1963 Equal Pay Act (118), but even this did not solve the problem. In fact, “in the United States, women earned 81 percent of men’s wages in 2010” (116). However, the bourgeois women earlier discussed would not be involved personally in this common struggle over time. It then seems logically unreasonable to classify women in general as a…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict Systems Theory

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The 19th century saw the rise of radical social theories that stressed the fact that the oppression of certain classes was part of a larger social system rather than a specific flaw of individuals with power. Marxism and anarchism are the best known of these and both stress that oppression of the working classes by the owners of capital is a system of relations, not a matter of personal immorality. The economic relations among classes in society are only one aspect of systems theory, but it has historically been by far the most important, and serves as the basis for all other theories of this type. (Niklas Luhmann 1999)…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communist Manifesto

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848 is noted as one of the most influential political documents in the world. The publication of the book earned Marx the reputation of a prominent sociologist and political theorist. Despite his renown, there are many controversies concerning the ideas and concepts of communism formulated in the papers that are still heatedly debated even today. Marx opened the book with, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (p.4). He scrutinized the class differences and social inequality between the Proletariats and Bourgeoisies, two terms he coined to represent social classes that do not own the means of production and social classes that do own the means of production respectively. Since The Communist Manifesto was produced in an era of great social distress, it was the result of Marx’s desire to eliminate the gap between the two classes in order to ameliorate the social, political, and economic conditions of the Proletarians. To achieve equality, Marx encouraged the Proletarians to conspire against the Bourgeoisies to end the exploitation of lower social classes and set up a communistic society where class distinction is a leap of imagination. However, his ideal required changes that a society cannot successfully adapt to and do not ultimately provide equality. Marx’s theories were established upon only class stratification and ignored the many other factors that contribute to the foundation of a society. The entire list of demands that outlines the rules and regulations of communism do not fundamentally offer fairness. Communism disrupts the whole social exchange system which will eventually corrupt the economy of a society. Thus, the theories introduced in The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx are not relevant in modern industrialized societies primarily because they focus only on the issue of class…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx

    • 2134 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will forever remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominates the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, hence, their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the proletariat, lacks any effective means of having just recompense for their hard labor. The remedy for this trouble, in Karl Marx’s view, was for the proletariat to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society; there would be no classes as such. Collective ownership of all capital for production would ensure, Marx suggested, an equitable distribution of wealth.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx’s theory of class struggle originates with his belief that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx & Engel, 1848). Marx had established that conflict between classes was the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social change. For Marx, conflict originates with the deterioration of a ‘false consciousness’ and the subsequent acquisition of a unified ‘class consciousness’. Marx argued that that proletariat was under the influence of a ‘false consciousness’ brought about with the acceptance of the dominant ideology that freedom and equality could be interpreted as an equal exchange of labour for wages (van Krieken et al., 2010). Marx however, perceived this as an exploitive relationship because in capitalism, the labourer only receives what is deemed sufficient to meet his basic needs for himself and his family, as opposed to the real value of his…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx, a political philosopher, who coined the term ‘Proletariat’, to describe the urban working class and ‘Bourgeoisie’ to describe the employers, saw the inequality of wealth between the two different classes of the industrial society as being unfair and immoral because the Bourgeoisie had all the wealth while the Proletariat who earned that wealth had nothing. This inequality, he believed, would breed hostility between the classes. He said that the Industrial Revolution had created the ‘Capitalist System’. A system, that protects the interest of the Bourgeoisie who…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alternatively, Marxists are not concerned with the ideas of individual workers about their position in society. They hold that a person’s class is not determined by the amount of wealth that he has, but by how he acquires it, as determined by his relation to labour and to the means of production. As defined by Lenin Vladimir I., "Classes are large groups of people differing from each other by the place they occupy in a historically determined system of social production, by their relation (in most cases fixed and formulated by law) to the means of production, by their role in the social organisation of labour, and, consequently, by the dimensions of the share of social wealth of which they dispose and their mode of acquiring it" (1965, p421).…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist Feminism

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marxist Feminism is a form of feminist theory that focuses on the social institutions of private property and capitalism to explain and criticize gender inequality and oppression. Marxist feminism states that private property gives rise to economic inequality, dependence, political mess, and an unhealthy relationship between men and women which in turn is the root of women’s oppression. Marxist feminist allies themselves with the theories of Karl Marx. Marx and Fredrick Engels constructed the structure of Marxist economics the philosophy of materialism and the basis of social of social analysis which is also known as historical materialism. Marx demonstrated that the working class is being exploited by capitalist, who pay workers for a minimum pay of the value they produce for major profit. The Marxist feminists believe that the actions of capitalist are the reason for women’s second class status. For example women oppression, racism, homophobia, prejudice views, bias opinions and any other derogative terms meant to keep women weak and down in a controlled environment ruled by men and their idealistic views. This is even worse for those who are colored because of race and the fact they are women. Capitalist save an abundance amount of money. According to Marxist theory any person is strongly influenced by the structure of society that they are in meaning their class structure. “Marx had inherited the idea of civil society as one of a pair of concepts, the other being, of course, the state”. Marx saw that civil society was very important for the origin of capitalism. The main objective of Marxist paradigm is on how economic relations govern the political, rather than on the different kinds of civil society which cannot be broken down to economic classes or relationships. Civil society for Marx implies “forms” which just means economic developments are happening. “An essential aspect of civil society is that it is a sphere autonomous of the state, that it is not…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having such theoretical constraints, there is one central concept that is the idea of class.1 The State is seen as the expression or condensation of class relations, which implies a pattern of domination and oppression that are other general elements of Marxist perspective. A class interest is seen to manage the State apparatus in the interest of the class alone. This involves the exercise of power over groups or classes. The history of State therefore, the history of such class domination and class struggle. This notion of class also links up with human labour and a…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays