Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Pressuasive Essay on Why the Electoral College Is No Longer Needed

Better Essays
733 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pressuasive Essay on Why the Electoral College Is No Longer Needed
Electoral College

Have you ever wondered why the Electoral College is still needed to elect a chief executive into office? You see, the Electoral College consists of the electors appointed by each state to cast a vote for president. It is the majority of electoral votes, not the popular vote of the people, that determines who wins the presidency. Worse, the electors may vote however they wish; it is not required for them to vote according the popular vote of their states. When the 12th Amendment was written, our country did not have the communication abilities it does today. Communication wasn’t always accurate and at times it was very difficult. It would have been difficult for most citizens to make an informed decision about their vote, so electors were chosen for their education, wisdom and understanding of politics. Today, however, most of our citizens are better-educated and far more informed than citizens were in the 18th century. The Electoral College is no longer needed to elect our president. On the other side however, supporters of the Electoral College say its is designed to bring together the largest possible support for the winner, but this “winner take all” politics is not always reflecting what the American people want. It’s a riggable system, basically. Others might say that distribution of support is more important than depth of support, but these electors are humans and are naturally more open to vote for who they want rather than what the people want. It even states that the elector can vote for who they want. So what’s not to say it isn’t a biased election on the electors’ part? Therefore, we no longer need the Electoral College. The people can, are willing, and able to speak for themselves. One very crucial reason there should be no Electoral College is that it violates political equality. “At base, it violates political equality, it’s not a neutral counting device; instead, it favors some citizens over others (George Edwards).” Not all of our citizens are represented in this system. Rich are favored over poor in some cases, because of assumptions on their intelligence level. People should be able to speak for themselves on who the want for President. Again, the U.S. has no need for the Electoral College. The Electoral voting system is supposed to reflect the popular vote. “It’s an institution that aggregates the popular vote (Daniel DiSalvo).” You see, this is really how the College is supposed to work, but that’s not how it is at all. The electors do not have to choose for who the public votes on. The votes from the people could be 3-1 on not voting somebody for office, but for the Electoral College it could be 1-3 in not voting them to office. The system does not always go hand in hand with what society wants, and sometimes the electoral votes overrule what the people want. Therefore, the U.S. should be independent from the Electoral College. The Electoral College can at times be biased on the type over person they want to be in office. “[It] tends to favor the candidate [deemed] “next in line” (Daniel DiSalvo).”
The college will look for a certain type of person they see as fit. Sometimes though, you must look at all the candidates, even though one may be less qualified or overlooked in the public, because they could very well be better suited for office. Again, the Electoral College should have no say in who is elected Chief Executive. The people should never get the “hand-me-down” treatment the Electoral College seems to imply. The Electoral College violates political equality, its doesn’t reflect the popular vote like it’s supposed to, and it in some cases be biased on the type of person they want, and overlook other candidates. The peoples’ voice on who they want to run their country should never be overwritten by anyone. What if there comes a day when this voting system allows us no say in president?

Article #1
Website address: http://www.npr.org/templates/text/s.php?Sld=412786&m=1
Date accessed; October 24, 2004
Title of article: Debating the merits of the Electoral College
Organization: NPR Listening Panel

Newspaper #2
Title of newspaper: New York Times
Title of story: Factions have a roll to play
Author: Daniel DiSalvo
Date written: January 4, 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Over the two hundred plus years that it has existed, the Electoral College had been criticized by a number of critics. One of the main reasons that people propose for a reform or to eliminate the Electoral College system entirely is because this system creates a possibility for a minority president to be elected. For example, if the country is deeply divided between three or more presidential candidates, the candidates could end up splitting the electoral votes in a way which none of them would obtain the necessary majority. Moreover, if one candidate’s popularity is concentrated in only a few states while the other candidate maintained a small lead in enough states, he or she could have the needed majority to win Electoral College. Although this occurrence has happened many times through the political history of America, but it if were to occur again today, the only way that the election would end with an absolute majority is when one of the candidates throws…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, the Electoral College should go. I have three reasons why the Electoral College should be either get rid of. My reasons are that it focuses more on smaller states than big states, Hamilton had other intentions for the Electoral College, and the Electoral College was meant to be for small states so it would be more equal.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    And yet with all these negative aspects to it one has to wonder what election system is the best suited for America and the best successor to the Electoral College? In response, I propose that the Electoral College should not be reformed but completely gotten rid of and replaced with a direct election system, where basically the presidency is determined by a popular vote. This way, everybody’s vote counts equally and it is a much fairer and democratic way of electing our president. But before I outline all the problems with the Electoral College and why it needs to be replaced by the direct vote election system, it is necessary to have a brief…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The upcoming presidential election is just around the corner, and with that comes the never ending debate over the Electoral College. Should it be abolished? Why is it beneficial? Why was it even created? These are just some questions usually associated with the Electoral College. On the contrary to what some might think the Electoral College should be in place and not abolished. Why? To understand this one must first know why the the founding fathers created it, what the Electoral College is, and understand the views of the naysayers.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In America, every four years there is a presidential election that gives everyday Americans the right to vote. The United States is a role model to other countries for giving the concept that all citizens should have equal say in the government and the way it is run. The Electoral College ruins the voting and creates an unfair system that is not equal. It destroys the fundamental part of democracy that gives everyone a fair right to vote. The Electoral College raises the question "Is the United States a Democracy?". With the Electoral College, it is a winner take all system which makes some voter feel that their vote is practically useless. The founding fathers believed that most people were uneducated and therefore make uninformed decisions…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe there are more reasons to abolish or update the Electoral College than to continue with our current system. First, it discourages candidates from focusing on those states with fewer electoral votes therefore encouraging the candidates to only focus on approximately one third of the country. How can a system work for the country as…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Without a doubt, the Electoral College is not the best or most efficient system for the elections, but it all we got until we get something better. The number of electoral votes given to each individual state isn’t enough, especially to the smaller states. Also the Electoral College may sometimes prefer one candidate more than the others because of the candidates importance and publicality. The electoral College has been proven to be flawed but no trys to fight or go against it. You can’t forget it system favors others more.The Electoral College is an important system in the US for the time…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although I believe the Electoral College needs many changes, it is necessary in order to have a successful government that is fair. Thee main argument against the Electoral College is that the presidency should be won by popular vote alone. It shouldn't be that one candidate could win the popular vote, but lose the election. At first I completely agreed with this, because we do live in a democracy, and I believe that a democracy is a government for the people by the people. This would mean that the mass population decides who is the president, not a hand picked group of men to vote on who they wish, because they do not always have to vote on the candidate in which the state has voted the majority on. Although the Electoral College may take away the presidency from the candidate that won the majority vote, it evens things out across the nation.…

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Electoral College is an integral part of America’s political system. In 1787, the delegates of the Constitutional Convention decided on the creation of the Electoral College, or a system under which a body is elected with the expressed purpose of itself electing a higher body. The College was established by Article Two, Section One of the United States Constitution. (Lesson 2: Political Participation, n.d.) The Founding Fathers wished to provide the people of each state the ability every four years to choose the number of electors who would vote in the Electoral College, who would in turn determine which candidate would enter the White House as the nation’s next president. (Watts, 2010) For the past 200 years, the Electoral…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There have been many talks about the Electoral College and how it should or should not be abolished when election time comes around. Many people feel that the electoral college is unfair because it seems that even if we vote it only comes down to the electoral college to see if they won presidency or re-election. Personally, I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished nationwide, so that way our voice can be “heard” or used more within the government. It should also be abolished because of the fact how in most of the elections, the Presidents are most and only elected because of the electoral college and our own vote, the vote that we had taken our own time to choose our future leader that will guide the country in the right path. Instead, the states choose who to vote just because the majority of the Electoral College is just one of the parties that dominate that state and not the other. For example, since the state of Texas is Republican dominated, what if the people had voted for the democratic side and the democratic won by the popular votes in the state of Texas, then it wouldn’t matter just because of how the state chooses who to vote because of the majority of the party in Texas. This to me is very outrageous because of how our forefathers from the past had fought for our right to vote, it is being put to waste since it only goes by the Electoral College and not our votes. For example, when Al Gore ran for his presidency the first time, we had the people, even though I wasn’t the age to vote at the moment, had chosen Al Gore to run this fine country of ours, even though the popular vote came close. He was the clear winner that the people had chosen to lead this country, but instead was cheated out of being President because of how George W. Bush had won the Electoral College by a small margin; he was instead elected to be the President to lead our nation. Because of this also, if feel that it is actually time for the…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dear Mr. Senator, the Electoral College may be a former method in our changing world, but it still plays an important role in our government. To date, it has been the best method in choosing our president and that should not change. This style of voting is the most organized style to elect important officials and has proven again and again how effective it is. It evades the hassle of runoff elections, makes it up to larger states that have fewer votes and requires a trans-region appeal to all candidates to make campaigning fair. To get rid of the Electoral College would be like removing a piece of a crucial part of our past and future.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Electoral College has been a topic of discussion ever since the election of 2000. When you rely on this system, there could easily be a different outcome in the electoral vote and the popular vote. With the Electoral College in place, some of Americans’ votes are basically worthless. When the Electoral College was put into place it was a solution to a problem of the 1780’s, now in the 21st century, all Americans should have a voice. Although some people feel the Electoral College is just, the Electoral College is an unfair and outdated way of picking a President; the popular vote is the best way to elect a President in the best interest for the public.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Conclusion the electoral college should not be kept in the constitution because it creates the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote. Also it makes votes not feel important and like their vote doesn't matter. It distorts the presidential campaign by encouraging the parties to write more than 40 states (plus the District of Columbia) that they know they either can’t win or…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays