Preview

Preliminary Findings: Information Technology in a Learning Organization - Case Study and Causal Diagrammi

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Preliminary Findings: Information Technology in a Learning Organization - Case Study and Causal Diagrammi
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN A LEARNING ORGANIZATION - Case Study and Causal Diagramming Warren W. Tignor 1. Introduction This study addresses the role information technology plays in a learning organization. In general, a learning organization takes advantage of current and past knowledge to further the goals of the business. Information technology permeates business organizations today as the trend to automate continues to accelerate daily. In many instances, information technology helps businesses do things quicker, better and cheaper; in most cases this results in better profitability. Case study represents a vast source of past business knowledge available to learn from to influence future decisions. Causal diagrams will help the business analyst identify the major influencing factors of the case and the feedback mechanism that impacts the case results. This study presents the hypothesis that the collaborative effect of case study and information technology using causal diagramming in a learning organization will improve the potential of businesses to adapt to new competitive situations. 2. Review of Literature This study surveys the current literature regarding learning organizations and information technology 's role with a particular emphasis on case study and causal diagrams defined as System Dynamics information technology. 2.1 LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS According to Dixon (1993) the reason that most organizations are inefficient learners is their lack of systematic processes to facilitate learning. The literature review that follows is organized around the derived distinguishing characteristics based on the following clustered attributes of learning organizations: 1.0 “Total Systems Perspective” 1.1 Inquire into systemic consequences (Koffman & Senge, 1995) 1.2 Acknowledge primacy of whole v. pieces (Koffman & Senge, 1995) 1.3 Facilitate systems perspective (systemic relationships) (Nevis, et al., 1995) 1.4 Systems thinking (exam whole vs.


Bibliography: Argyris, C & Schön, D.A. (1978) . Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Cash, J, McFarlan, F., McKenney, J., Applegate, L. (1992) . Corporate information systems management: text and cases. Illinois: Irwin. Dixon, N. (1993) . Organizational learning. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada Report 111-93. Dodgson, M. (1993) . Organizational learning: A review of some literature. Organization Studies, 14/3, 375-394. Fiol, C.M., & Lyles, M.A. (1985) . Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10/4, 803813. Forrester, J. W. (1992) . System dynamics and learner-centered-learning in kindergarten through 12th grade education (D-#4337), Systems Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, (pp.1-20). Forrester, J. W. (1991) . Systems dynamics and the lessons of 35 years. In Kenyon B. De Greene (Ed.), Systemic basis of policy making in the 1990s (pp. 5-34). [http://tfnet.ils.unc.edu/~gotwals/stella/sdg/sdlessons.txt]. Hahn, P. (1996) . Introduction to the case study method, [http://128.146.140.187/ae601/hahnpam.html]. Huber, G. P. (1991) . Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organization Science, 2/1, 88-115. Huff, S. L., Tawfik, J., Cash, J., & Pifko, J. (1996) . Teaching information systems management with cases, 1-6, [http://www.business.uwo.ca/~isworld/article.html]. Kofman, F., & Senge, P. (1995) . Communities of commitment: The heart of the learning organization. In Sarita Chawla & John Renesch (Eds.), Learning Organizations (pp. 15-43). Productivity Press: Portland, OR. Nevis,.C., DiBella, J, & Gould, M. (1995) . Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 73-85. Senge, P. M. (1990) . The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency. Sprague, H. & McNurlin, C. (1993) . Information systems management in practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Wolstenholme, E. F. (1990) . System enquiry: A system dynamic approach. Chicester: Wiley & Sons.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    This paper will discuss how an information system is critical to the business process of an organization and how the information has impacted the organization 's structure.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI 610 Group DB Forum 1

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Purhaghshenas, S. H., & Esmatnia, M. (2012). Learning Organizations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(7), 243-249. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1271924293?accountid=12085…

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    eeoc

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Organizational learning theory states that, in order to be competitive in a changing environment, organizations must change their goals and actions to reach those goals. In order for learning to occur, however, the firm must make a conscious decision to change actions in response to a change in circumstances, must consciously link action to outcome, and must remember the outcome.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, in order to run a successful business several different factors take a role to keep a well-organized and efficient business practice. Today, businesses develop and manage information systems and system thinking to help eliminate day to day issues that can occur. The concept of System thinking helps people understand the systems problems and help find a solution to those problems by finding out the root causes of the problem and considering all of them as a whole system. This helps improve a company’s understanding of planning systems (A. Bartra, 2010). Understanding System thinking helps businesses and systems run more efficiently. Studies have repeatedly found that Information systems and business strategy increase profit, productivity, sales growth, and reputation. These strategies have encouraged more and more businesses to turn to Information Systems to increase all these business factors. (Pinsonneault, 2011)…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team and Team Processess

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Batool, H., & Riaz, S. (2011). Factors for making an organization ‘a learning organization’. Retrieved on August 26, 2011, from http://www.trikal.org/ictbm11/pdf/OB/D1132-done.pdf…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Submit this assignment to your instructor via the dropbox “LP1 Assignment: Systems Learning Organizational Model.” This assignment is worth 150 points.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsang EWK. Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Hum Relat. 1997;50(1):73–90.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Learning Culture

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. O’Keeffe, T. 2002. Organizational Learning: a new perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26 (2), pp. 130-141.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In terms of learning organizations, Senge (1990), states that the basic meaning of a learning organization is an organization that is continually expanding its capacity to create its future, and “System thinking”, his fifth…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Senge described learning organizations as places where “people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive pattern thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to learn together. Each of these disciplines involves a body of theory and techniques that must be practiced in order for mastery to develop” (Senge 1990). The disciplines are systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roughly 50% of corporate performance is attributed to responding to change and complexity intelligently (Halal, 1997). A learning organization is more than the sum of all knowledge from individual members because all information is not accessed equally. All information that is stored or processed by members is only accessed when needed. A learning organization involves the development of higher levels of knowledge and skill and encompasses four levels of learning. This goes from the learning basic facts, processes and procedures (level 1); learning transferrable jobs skills (level 2); learning to adapt (level 3); and learning to learn which corresponds to innovation and creativity (level 4 ) (Fargo & Skyrme, 1995). The last two levels are the types of learning that is preferred in learning organizations. Smaller networks being only partially connected increases the possibilities of a learning organization by leading to better utilization of internal and external knowledge . An organization’s real edge comes from having complex,…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coaching and Mentoring

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    References: Appelbaum, S., and Goransson, L. (1997) Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: A framework for research and application. The Learning Organization, 4(3), pp. 115-128.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategic Planning

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Easterby-Smith, Mark (1997), “Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques,” Human Relations, 50 (September), 1085–1113.…

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Action Learning in Action

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapter 1, talks about the changes in today’s society. With technology and globalization both having transformed our lives and the world in which we work in, we either get on board with it or get left behind. Organizations and Individuals must get adapt to these changes if they seek to participate in creative and meaningful ways with their changing environment. In order for companies to survive during these changes they have to find ways to fight (act) and drain (learn) simultaneously. Organizations that operate or change too slowly will not survive for long during the first century. Action learning for many organizations has become one of the most powerful action-oriented, problem solving tools as well for team approaching in order for them to operate better. With today’s many demands and so little time to focus on a one on one, corporations must find ways to get everything together in one session and begin the work in order to survive this world’s new change and be successful. Chapter 2 shows us the six essential elements of effective action learning. In chapter 1 we talked about the importance of action learning during our changing environment with technology and globalization. Action learning is very important and its programs are built around six distinct interactive components. Below are the six distinct interactive components that are to be followed, *A problem *the group *the questioning and reflection process *the commitment to taking action *the commitment to learning and *the facilitator. Action learning, when all its essentials elements are incorporated, has tremendous, far-reaching power and strength. Chapter 3 in this chapter, it describes how an actual action learning group operates. This is a proceeding of the previous chapter’s successful action learning program following the six components. The following questions are questions used in chapter 3 to show how the action learning group operates. *what are the different types of action learning…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Fulmer, Robert M., Keys, J. Bernard. (1998). A Conversation with Peter Senge: new developments in organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 33-42.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays