Preview

Power In Iron Man 2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Power In Iron Man 2
Iron Man 2 is a popular superhero movie, but underneath the action and explosions, it was affected by the American beliefs of their political system. Tony Stark is pictured as a very successful individual, and without his unique ideas and brave actions, the people would find themselves facing a corrupt company called Hammer. Stark has a successful weapons business, and these privately owned business and companies are shown to be important to capitalism’s success, this is shown by Iron Man being chosen over the government. The government is pictured as the adversary because corruption plagues many nations and even in a first world nation, people are still fearful of corruption within organizations of power. On a political level, Iron Man 2 …show more content…
Stark says,”My bond is with the people,” as he leaves the Senate meeting, and the crowd cheers for him, showing the distrust in the government and its belief that Iron Man is a threat. This hints that society should trust private protection, rather than a secretive government controlling them. This is proven beneficial, when the government’s alliance with Hammer completely backfires, and Stark must become the hero. Karl Marx believed that moving up in social class was nearly impossible, proven to be a common belief in the US.“You come from a family of thieves and butchers, and like all guilty men, you try to rewrite your history, to forget all the lives the Stark family has destroyed,” was a comment made by Ivan to Justin Hammer. In our culture it is common for people born into wealth to have more opportunities in life to succeed, than it is for a man like Ivan. Tony Stark was a billionaire, able to become a hero; Hammer, also wealthy, was successful in life, but inevitably failed due to him becoming an enemy of Stark. Yet, our culture believes that capitalism is the best, and anything else is not an option; communism would not have allowed for Stark to gain so much power and become a hero. The film portrays the possibility of becoming powerful and wealthy, like Stark, because of the system the US has in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels believed that Capitalist society, which is based on the right of each individual to own private property, is the cause of the main class divides evident in today's society. That the basic right to own property results in the ruling class, the bourgeoisie, becoming obsessed with the accumulation of possessions and, as a consequence, becoming slaves to commodities; Commodity fetishism. This resulted, they argued, in the widening of class divisions. Capitalist society is described by some as protecting freedom and individuality. However, it also, undeniably, encourages self-interest, greed and - as Marx argued - an obsession with private property. It is a society whose basis lies in the fundamental need to accumulate property. The people within this society who do not have the means to amass material possessions are pitied, considered the underclass. They are seen to be lacking in something, incomplete, and are encouraged to 'make something' of themselves. To acquire qualifications, a job that pays well, to set themselves up so that they too can begin to accumulate material goods. This, society argues, is what everyone should strive for.…

    • 2330 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution, factory workers received little pay, worked long hours, and never saw improvement in their living and working conditions. In the mean time, the middle class was emerging. They were rich because of the enormous amounts of money created in the country because of the Industrial Revolution. Marx thought that the capitalist system would eventually fail. He described communism as “a form of complete socialism in which the means of production--all land, mines, factories, railroads, and businesses—would be owned by the people” (649). He also thought all goods and services should be shared equally.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed that control in society was held by elite and economically-powerful groups who maintained social order for as long as it suited their own interests. However, this social dominance would eventually lead to a crisis point where the "exploited" (the working class) would challenge the "exploiting" (the elite groups) and the existing social order. It is at this point that conflict between the classes becomes the mechanism for social transformation. According to Marx, this class conflict would eventually lead to both the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of a communist society.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in a world today where everything is defined not by who you are, but rather by the money you make, the car you drive and the clothes you wear. It is a society where if you make a lot of money, drive that nice car, and wear the nice clothes you are considered at the top of society and one author thinks that this is what is causing the great amount of violence that we see in our world today. The author, Bell Hooks says in her book Where We Stand: Class Matters, “When the deluded young are forced to face the reality that we are bound by class, by limited resources, by the exhaustion of gloires, by endless exploitation, they become rage filled and rage addicted” (Hooks 87). This is then where the divide between those who are fulfilled with…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society there are many different factors which divide us and result in social inequality. In this essay, I will be covering social class. Karl Marx believed that in society, there are two major social classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. The bourgeoisie are basically the upper class; in order for you to be classed as a part of them you must own the means of production such as factories etc. In order for these factories to run, they would need workers, which is where the proletariats come in. The proletariat only owns their labour force which they sell in order for a wage. Karl Marx stated that the proletariats are exploited through low pay and poor work conditions, but due to capitalism, we deal with it as were tied down to the economy.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M2: This table shows that people who live in most deprived areas are more likely to smoke, are less likely to have a good education, they more than likely lived in poverty as a child. This table also shows that the least deprived people are the people with the most education and then end up becoming a professional or a manager. The Marxist approach would suggest that the least deprived are the ruling class and the most deprived are the working class in the hierarchy Marxists believe the most deprived people shouldn’t have an education they think they should be working for the least deprived people (Middle class) in factories and other places like that, they know that the most deprived may get ill from the working conditions but they don’t have to pay very much for the labour.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article begins by detailing the human desire for social power and how, through class, certain forms of power are achieved. He contends that the pursuit of social power is essentially an attempt to acquire social honour. Weber also mentions that power does not always lead to social honour and uses the notion of the American Boss as an example. However, he acknowledges that those who are considered honourable by society often gain social power or have a greater chance to do so.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    power

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indeed power, justice, and greed are influencing factors that can alter the course of one’s life. These themes have been represented in the following texts, William Shakespeare Macbeth (play on stage) and William Golding’s lord of the flies (novel). The techniques employed are, symbolism, characterisation, language features, and violence/drama. Both authors employ a number of techniques to make both texts come to life vividly and more realistic and make the audience to consider they are a part of the texts.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classism, an issue of oppression which exposes the ever-increasing differences and inequality between social classes in our society, and primarily measured by the wealth possessed and the amount of income a family or an individual earn, is every day more evident. For the last, few years we have witnessed the financial gap between wealthier and middle-class Americans widen as the years go by, but never as rapidly than after experiencing the last financial crisis of 2008. The effects of that financial crisis were disastrous, especially in the middle class. Americans lost millions of jobs, and wealth evaporated by the loss in value of real estate properties…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who learn middle-class views, with its norms, aspirations, and values, have little in common with the orientations to life that arise from living in neighborhoods of deep poverty” (355). Just because one has grew up in a less industrialized neighborhood should not classify them as not being able to achieve the same thing as someone in a more industrialized neighborhood; where you are opened to bigger and better things just because you have more money, this doesn’t make you any better than someone less fortunate. Everyone has choices and decisions to make in life, and it is up to you to change and become better than what you were before. Just because someone puts a label on you, you have the same right, just as anyone else to rise above no matter your race or gender. According to Mint in the article “America, though Challenged, still the land of Opportunity”, he states “the character of our culture has to do with opportunity in America”, meaning how you were brought up in life; whether you had to work for what you got, if you got things handed to you,…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s a misapplication of the theories of Charles Darwin that said all people are not born equal but some are born winners and some are born losers. They literally believed they were greater human beings compared to the lower classes. A quote that was used greatly by them was, “Life is inherently a struggle with the fit meriting riches and the unfit deserving exploitation and poverty.” They really felt that the poor deserved to be poor and the rich deserved to be richer, no matter what the cost was to society and the greater good of the American people. And when the Social Darwinists said they felt no guilt for what they said or did, a quote used to describe them was, “Men were answerable only to their own consciences and the consciences were well…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example If you are born into a family that is pretty well off they have the money to support you going to college and giving you the opportunity to create your American Dream, however if you are born into a family without a lot of money it's harder for you to receive a better education or get into college, which in these days plays a very important role in getting a high paying job. So it's almost like the the majority of the poor are forced into staying poor and the rich are able to stay rich because they grew up with the money to support their American Dream. Robert B. Reich explains that “ The higher you go in today's economy, the easier it is to make a pile of money without taking any personal financial risk. The lower you go, the bigger the risks and the smaller the rewards” (Reich 401). Since the rich have money to back them up they take more risks in life decisions that could potentially make their American Dream come true. The lower class on the other hand don’t have the money to back them up if they decide to make a risk that could make or break them so they just instead don’t take those risks and stay in their social class. This system makes the American Dream only really alive to those that can afford it, leaving the Americans who can’t and who really want this dream to make life decisions that could potentially leave them with…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays