Preview

Post 911 Speech Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Post 911 Speech Analysis
Bush, in his speech post 911, explicitly expressed the idea “you are either with us or against us” (3). He clearly determined to start the war on terror as a direct confrontation between two entities known as “us and them”, which has last for more than decades. This definition of two entities as shown could mean multiple confrontations including theocracy vs. secularism, and modern vs. pre-modern mentioned above. In fact, though these confrontations are still in place, they are in fact no longer solid because of the trend of globalization. While physical borders still hold and play an important role in international relations, realistically speaking, the ongoing trend of globalization obfuscates the old borders in all aspects including demographic borders, religious borders. The unclear border of the population results in difficulties in defining ourselves. A …show more content…
He asks us to reconsider the “principal of universality” (Chomsky 187) by which he argued “the importance to apply to ourselves the same standards we apply to others” (Chomsky 187). Within the growing trend of globalization, the clear boundaries of the civilizations, in fact, blur and the direct confrontation is neither necessary nor justified but misguided. The United States as well as the international terrorism should rethink their roles in the new norm of the clash of civilizations. In this globalized world, we need try to apply the universality in this norm while holding its exceptional ideologies. The conceptual bias rooted in Western ideology as well as the radical doctrine adopted by international terrorism should both end. More explicitly, both sides should apply this principle by regarding ourselves in an equal and mutual interdependent way. To accomplish this, we need to see ourselves in a huge mixed civilization in which each country and religion is closely related and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Summary

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 (better known as 9/11) by Osama Bin Laden rammed a wedge into the relationship between the United States and the Islamic world. In result the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and the invaded Iraq. Professor Irogbe’s article on the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq argues that the U.S. actions are igniting rather than reducing global terrorism and if U.S. were to withdraw troops from these countries it would promise for global peace and security. The article covers the cost of human and financial resources of the war, abuses committed by invaders including the application of extraordinary rendition, the indefinite detention of prisoners…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does Bush use Ethos , pathos , and logos in his address to the Nation on 9/11/01? He does more than you might think He uses ethos when he is trying to convince you he is a trustworthy person . He uses pathos to make you to start feeling and stop thinking. He uses logos to appeal to your logical side.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global politics come with many question marks when regarding predicting the future, however many theorists and writers continuously attempt to predict what will end up happening. Samuel P. Huntington, a professor who taught at Harvard University, wrote a thesis titled The Clash of Civilizations, becoming yet another educated theorist attempting to understand future relations among civilizations. However, Huntington creates an interesting hypothesis that person’s cultural and religious beliefs will become the key source of conflict throughout the world post-Cold War. This thesis eventually leads to some of the current scenarios in the modern day world, mainly due to the interaction between Syrian activist group ISIS and the United States.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    D-Day Speech Analysis

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States of America (Bio Reference Bank), delivered his “On the 40th Anniversary of D-Day speech” on June 6th 1984 (Academic Search Premier). This day was the 40th anniversary of D-day, when 150,000 men charged the beaches of Normandy to retake Europe from the Nazis (American History Online). The speech was also delivered during the Cold war, an arms race between the USA and USSR (American History Online). President Reagan uses logos, pathos, and anaphora to explain to the heads of state, and the world, the need of peace with the USSR while being ready for an attack.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Barack Obama began his tenure noting – much like President Bush – that the United States will defeat the terrorists, a message echoed by his Vice President Joe Biden. President Obama also concurred with the Bush administration’s articulation of terrorists as those who slaughter innocents. And, as President Bush, the forty-fourth President noted with considerable pride that America’s “security emanates from the justness of [her] cause, the force of [her] example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.” America’s spirit is stronger and it will not apologize for its way of life nor waver in its defense. Moreover, President Obama picked up on President Bush’s theme of admonishing heinous regimes who torture and murder their…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Terror vs. Wwi

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beneath its cloak, the infamous War on Terror garners striking similarities to WWI. The terror attack on Austria-Hungary ignited the War on Terror…nearly a century later. It was not until 1914 that a terrorist attack was utilized to provoke military response. The attack of September 11 is a modern replay of this attack. George W. Bush leapt into the war against Baghdad in 2003 with the same attitude of Woodrow Wilson in the Great War. One of Wilson’s reasons for going to war against Germany was based on his belief that his country’s victory could birth democracy and peace in foreign lands. George Bush agrees with this principle; this is proven in how he attacks Baghdad’s dictatorship with the aspiration to bring democratic change. Both wars appear to be debilitative yet not decisive. The Great War could practically be defined by the word “stalemate.” The general American population has no idea whether or not their country is winning the War on Terror; rather, the war seems to have relatively equal success on both sides and may end in surrender much like its predecessor. With an assassination spark, both of their American leaders shared similar views, and both are indecisive wars.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, they were wrong because new enemies and problems emerged almost immediately. President Bush gave a speech in which he referred to a “new world order” that had been ushered in with the end of the Cold War. As the remaining world superpower, the United States would act as a “police force” to help maintain peach and order around the globe. After attacks on American soil the United States declared a general War on Terror. The War on Terror is an effort by the governments of the U.S. and its principal allies to destroy groups deemed to be “terrorists” and to ensure that “rogue states” no longer support terrorist activities. As nations interacted with each other, both nationalism and orthodoxy increased. These groups are often referred to as religious extremists. The rise of religious extremism spawned a series of conflicts in Middle…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In turn, Bush argues that the defensive capabilities of the US need to be transformed. He argues that while the US should remain the world’s strongest military, they also need to invest resources into Homeland Security as well as their intelligence services so that they can better predict and foil terror attacks. The most important element of the Bush doctrine, however, is his belief that “the best defence is a good offense”, and that the practice of pre-emptive attacks is crucial to American success. But, given that many terrorists are stateless, this raises the question of how do you attack an intricate global network. To this, Bush’s answer is that any state that works with these groups will be deemed an enemy of the US, and a potential target of the US military. Because of the potential damage of WMDs, and a large number of unstable countries possessing these, Bush fears that it is quite plausible for a terrorist cell to obtain a WMD and use it against the US. Thus, according to Bush’s strategy, the invasion of Iraq was not only justified, but also integral to the protection of the…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At 9:02 a.m. on April 19, 1995, a 5,000-pound bomb, hidden inside a Ryder truck, exploded just outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion caused massive damage to the building and killed 168 people, 19 of whom were children (Rosenburg, 2011). On April 23, four days after the bombing, President Bill Clinton addressed the public and gave an effective, excellent speech.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clashing Civilization?

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Edward Said’s essay “Clashing Civilizations?”, he analyses in detail the arguments of Samuel Huntington in his paper on “Clash of Civilizations”. Edward Said incisively analyzes Huntington’s notion that differences in culture between the ‘West’ and ‘Islam’ will lead to conflicts between the two civilizations. Arguing against large understanding of cultures, Said makes a powerful case for multiculturalism. As he argues in this essay, “A unilateral decision made to undertake crusades, to oppose their evil with our good, to extirpate terrorism and, in Paul Wolfowitz’s nihilistic vocabulary, to end nations entirely, doesn’t make the supposed entities any easier to see; rather, it speaks to how much simpler it is to make bellicose statements for the purpose of mobilizing collective passions than to reflect, examine, sort out what it is we are dealing with in reality, the interconnectedness of innumerable lives, ‘ours’ as well as ‘theirs’.”…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jihad vs Mcworld

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page

    Political scientist Barber (Rutgers; An Aristocracy of Everyone, 1992, etc.) grandly divides the planet into no more and no less than two camps to explain the present universal, sorry mess. The only hope, he says, is democracy, and between the equally malign forces of Jihad and McWorld, the odds for it aren't too good. According to the professor's realpolitik, McWorld means not merely worldwide fast food but all capitalist buccaneering, global marketeering, cyberspace, megamergers, and international corporate incest aimed at nothing but profit. The Japanese motor in your Swiss camera might be made in China and sold by a British ad agency. Borders mean nothing in McWorld; the sun never sets on its flag. Movies, TV, and theme parks like EuroDisney and the local mall are all. Fighting for hegemony, probably without ultimate success according to Barber, is international Jihad. By Jihad he means not merely Hamas or Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman. Add neo-Nazis, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, unregulated militia members, and the balkanization of the Balkans. Fundamentalism and nationalism, often drawing sustenanance from imaginary history, are in impassioned battle with infotainment and merchandising. The struggle is not impeded by any government or international agreement. Earth looks like a political Rubik's cube. Jihad receives bomb-making instructions on the Internet. McWorld sells designer jeans to Palestinian and Israeli alike. The paradox hardly enhances the freedom of the individual, and democracy suffers under either banner. And yet, declares Barber, democracy is our only viable choice. The bifurcation of the global village may seem simplistic, but assuredly the dialectic is not. The author's range is, perforce, universal. Certainly he is no optimistic Toffler, Fukuyama, or Pangloss. His concern for the public weal is patent; his impassioned argument is provocative and portentous. This is a generally erudite, copiously detailed synthesis, a polemic long on problems and short on…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Globalization and Terrorism: globalization is “far from spreading peace” and terrorism can be seen as a by-product of this master trend…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    911 Informative Speech

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    July 16, 2016, A man drove a truck through a crowd of people killing 84 leaving many more injured. March 22, 2016, Three terrorists placed two bombs in Brussels Airport, in Zaventem and one at Maalbeek metro station in Brussels killing 32 and injuring over 300. November 13, 2015, Three suicide bombers walked into the Baltaclan concert hall and opened fire on a Eagles Of Death Metal concert killing 89, 101 injured and leaving 99 to fight for their lives when they had done nothing wrong. September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers hijacked 4 airliners, two of the airliners, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, were crashed into the north and south towers of the world trade center. Within one hour and forty-two minutes both towers collapsed. American airlines flight 77 was flown into the Pentagon the last plane United Airline Flight 93 was steered toward…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has only been a little more than a decade since the grave events of September 11, 2001, a tragic day forever marked in America’s history. The attack on the World Trade Center was a pivotal occasion that began the crisis that is the United State’s moral and political ambiguity of the 21st century. This has been a decade of vague and changing policy when looking at international affairs. From the power change in the Pentagon to the transition of circumstances across the globe, the years following the 9/11 attacks have emphasized the point of stance that Jack Snyder has taken in his “One World, Rival Theories.” Black and white cease to exist when foreign policy ideologies are put to practice; the theories are bent and blended to suit the present…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Security Strategy of the United States has marked similarities and differences to the Security Strategy of Europe. This can be effectively traced to the similarities and differences between the two cultures themselves, particularly in the cultural factors of religion, modernization, ethnicity/nationalism, and geography. The US and Europe have different responses to the modernization of warfare from traditional (ships, armies, tanks, aircraft) to “asymmetrical” (terrorism, cyber-warfare), largely from differences in geography: With the notable exceptions of Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Center, our enemy threat has been thousands of miles away, while Europe has seen two bloody “world wars” and acts of terror committed right on home soil. However, for the purposes of this paper, I will focus on religion and ethnicity/nationalism, and how these two factors affect strategic culture.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays