Preview

Populism In The 1890s

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Populism In The 1890s
The struggle for freedom from the bondage of racial oppression did not stop in America, and it can be remembered that in the 1880s to 1890s, there was a political movement of workers and low scale farmers known as the populist emerging from Midwest and South. In this organization, it was known that black tenant farmers and the low scale white farmers from South would work together against large landowners who were considered the Southern elites. As a united team, the populists became real threats to the dominant groups, but unfortunately, the strong movement of the agrarians was torn by the racial and eventually collapsed.
Genocide and geographical displacement
Racism in America appeared to have started from foreigners who invade the land. The European settlers came to North America and started displacement and genocide to take over the land. The British colonies introduced it and later it was the United States government. The lands that belonged to the natives were forcefully taken with some being killed and later shifted to treaties with certain conditions. The rights of these individual natives were later ignored on the basis that the natives were uncivilized and did not own lands since they lived a nomadic life and even in case where the American natives were
…show more content…
The blacks were free, but very few could own lands. The white masters had landed but lack power over labor. To keep their ex-slaves, they came up with sharecropping. In this case, the black was given lands to rent and payback in the form of production share to the landowners. In this scheme, it was of importance to the landowners since almost all the Blacks wanted to tenant farmers while they were politically weak and economically unstable hence the landowners dictated them as demonstrated by Zieger. It was a new form of racism that blacks in the south experienced after being denied their political and legal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecrop Contract

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sharecrop Contracts of the 1882 was a contract that seemed to be for the landowners and not for the actual sharecropper. The landowners seem to not really take care of the sharecroppers in any way. The landowner’s responsibilities seem to only be to supply the land or more like renting it and reaping the profits of the share croppers in order to keep them in debt to the landowners and never actually freeing them to own their own land and freedom actually keeping them not, as slaves, but still getting the benefits of slavery. The landowners agreed to supply 30 to 35 acres and furnish them, or basically rent them, a team of horses, a plow, and farming implements. Landowners insisted that the sharecroppers give them half of their crops no questions ask or at least make up for half of the fodder even if the sharecroppers crops failed for any reason. The sharecroppers wasn’t even supposed to be concerned with where the seed to the cotton or corn went or even know how much product they produced, the Landowner kept it housed and took it to the market and sold it and the sharecropper had to just trust that they was being honest in giving them what was left after the Landowner took out all the expenses and deductions. The landowners also made it where the sharecroppers could not plant any produce at their place of living if so the Landowner received a portion of it.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the disenfranchisement, Black people were discriminated against throughout the South through a series of ‘Black codes’. The Black codes were aimed to keep free Blacks as second-class citizens. Black codes regulated all activities and behavior of Black people. Free Blacks were prohibited from basic constitutional rights of assembling in groups, bearing arms, learning to read and write, free speech or to testify against white people in court. Black codes also restricted Backs to own property, conduct business, buy and lease land, and move freely through public spaces. The codes also criminalized Black men who were out of work or who were not working at a job whites recognized. These legalized discrimination laws kept the subordination of Blacks and maintained white supremacy throughout the South and rest of the…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the civil war ended, the freedmen of the south needed a way to get back into the fields and rebuild the southern economy. The Congress tried to give freed slaves their own little farm, but they were not ready to run one after working only in the fields all their lives. The way this problem was solved was with tenant farms. Freemen and former slaves were allowed to work in the fields of a landowner, and in return, they were supplied with food, shelter, clothes, seeds, and equipment. I don’t think tenant farms and sharecropping was a wise way to run the farming industry after the civil war. Though sharecropping was bad for many, it did benefit some people. It benefitted landowners for several reasons. Reason number one being they didn’t…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States, racism had been for several hundred years; it’s aslo been a controversial subject for people for a long period of time. Whenever we talk about this subject, it always reminds me about the book called “Race and Manifest Destiny” by Reginald Horsman. This book is one of the greatest books about the racism in the United States from 1776 to 1865. During the early years of America’s history, society was categorized by class rather than skin color. In the early of colonial period, black and white workers who worked together everywhere. However, the crisis of the Norh American owners in the early of sixteenth century has changed the system. Black enslavement had become necessary for the American agricultural economy. There is the first formed an equal human being between blacks and whites. From the beginning of the United State nation to 1865, there was always a distance which separated the White people and Black people or Indian people due to the racial discrimination in the society at that time.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern state legislatures had passed and maintained a series of discriminatory requirements and practices that had disenfranchised most of the millions of African Americans across…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While also maintaining their agrarian status, they were able to do so through convict leasing. What convict leasing allowed the South to do was maintain free labor to citizens while not violating the new slavery laws and creating a new penal system that was cost efficient. Farmers were able to continue having a work force to uphold their land and keep production going. Slaves were freed, in which most either migrated north or became criminals because of their lack of knowledge about the free world. This eventually got them into many a predicament. The majority of slaves that did not become convicts ended up working for their previous owner. Sharecropping also became popular as a contrary to convict leasing. Ex-slaves would care for and live off of a certain amount of the land lord's crops. In return they would give the land lord a measurement of the crops as payment. This system still gave whites the superiority of the mainly black ex-slave population. Another goal of the South was to not let the new population of freed slaves to become of equal social status as the public. Land lords often created a system where the ex-slave would have to give them so much of the crops grown to pay for essential needs, for example clothing or books. The unfortunate situation was that the share croppers never made enough profit to sustain themselves and once again ended upon the street and/or in debt. This resulted in a higher possibility of them becoming…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forum 2

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What was Jim Crow? Would the answer to the previous question serve also to explain the establishment of Jim Crow in the South?…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1890s, social divisions in America were at their lowest wages. The Industrial Revolution happened before labor laws. Children as young as eight were working fourteen hour shifts in factories. Wages decreased until unions appeared. There were three different class divisions; the rich class, the middle class, and the poor class.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecropping is a system where a freedman would grow crops on someone else’s land and the farmer would give a portion of the crops to the owner as payment. It seemed like a reasonable way for everyone in the south to be profitable. Freed slaves would use their skills to make money, while landowners use some of the crops to make money without working. Unfortunately, the system had its faults.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period of the 1950’s, black people were discriminated against and received unfair treatment because of white people’s opinion on the race. Black people at the time had to live in very bad conditions, health, housing and school wise. It was enforced very harshly that white and black people (or people of colour) to be separated. This washarsher in the south due to the fact they were more openly racist than the north of America. This is due to slavery as most farms were founded in the south. White people still wanted to hold onto there belief of power and higher status. In 1863 Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery. In 1890s there was a marked increase in laws…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecroppers were people who agreed to maintain a person's crops in return for food and shelter. As a result of the boll weevil eating the crops, african americans did not get the return of food and shelter and most of them lost their jobs. For this reason is why hey had to migrate north. Even though there…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Populist and Progressive movements have many similarities and differences. Generally speaking, these two movements both supported a more involved government and also, sought to erase the corruptions in the government. The Populists and the Progressives wanted the government to become more active and regulate changes such as the industrialization and the development of cities, so they both opposed laissez-faire, a system where the government kept their hands off. However, the Populists and the Progressives had a core difference. The Populists were mostly composed of farmers who felt threatened by the dominance of the corporations while the Progressives were mostly composed of middle-class, white collar or professional men and women who felt…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the political landscape of the late nineteenth century, the Populist party was recognized even by its critics as being ahead of its time. Its members saw themselves as bearers of a reform message vital to the nation, reflecting agrarian America's anxiety that the country was moving toward a new form of slavery in the face of changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution. These issues were for many Americans the "Crisis of the Nineties," and Populists met that crisis with a stand against imperialism, a commitment to human rights, and a deep distrust of big business.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays